-
Higher order harmonic generation and strong field ionization with Bessel-Gauss beams in a thin jet geometry
Authors:
Michael Davino,
Adam Summers,
Tobias Saule,
Jan Tross,
Edward McManus,
Brandin Davis,
Carlos A. Trallero-Herrero
Abstract:
A promising alternative to Gaussian beams for use in strong field science is Bessel-Gauss (BG or Bessel-like) laser beams as they are easily produced with readily available optics and provide more flexibility of the spot size and working distances. Here we use BG beams produced with a lens-axicon optical system for higher order harmonic generation (HHG) in a thin gas jet. The finite size of the in…
▽ More
A promising alternative to Gaussian beams for use in strong field science is Bessel-Gauss (BG or Bessel-like) laser beams as they are easily produced with readily available optics and provide more flexibility of the spot size and working distances. Here we use BG beams produced with a lens-axicon optical system for higher order harmonic generation (HHG) in a thin gas jet. The finite size of the interaction region allows for scans of the HHG yield along the propagation axis. Further, by measuring the ionization yield in unison with the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) we are able to distinguish regions of maximum ionization from regions of optimum XUV generation. This distinction is of great importance for BG fields as the generation of BG beams with axicons often leads to oscillations of the on-axis intensity, which can be exploited for extended phase matching conditions. We observed such oscillations in the ionization and XUV flux along the propagation axis for the first time. As it is the case for Gaussian modes, the harmonic yield is not maximum at the point of highest ionization. Finally, despite Bessel beams having a hole in the center in the far field, the XUV beam is well collimated making BG modes a great alternative when spatial filtering of the fundamental is desired.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Tracking the Ultraviolet Photochemistry of Thiophenone During and Beyond the Initial Ultrafast Ring Opening
Authors:
Shashank Pathak,
Lea M. Ibele,
Rebecca Boll,
Carlo Callegari,
Alexander Demidovich,
Benjamin Erk,
Raimund Feifel,
Ruaridh Forbes,
Michele Di Fraia,
Luca Giannessi,
Christopher S. Hansen,
David M. P. Holland,
Rebecca A. Ingle,
Robert Mason,
Oksana Plekan,
Kevin C. Prince,
Arnaud Rouzée,
Richard J. Squibb,
Jan Tross,
Michael N. R. Ashfold,
Basile F. E. Curchod,
Daniel Rolles
Abstract:
Photoinduced isomerization reactions, including ring-opening reactions, lie at the heart of many processes in nature. The mechanisms of such reactions are determined by a delicate interplay of coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics unfolding on the femtosecond scale, followed by the slower redistribution of energy into different vibrational degrees of freedom. Here we apply time-resolved photoele…
▽ More
Photoinduced isomerization reactions, including ring-opening reactions, lie at the heart of many processes in nature. The mechanisms of such reactions are determined by a delicate interplay of coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics unfolding on the femtosecond scale, followed by the slower redistribution of energy into different vibrational degrees of freedom. Here we apply time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy with a seeded extreme ultraviolet free electron laser to trace the ultrafast ring opening of gas phase thiophenone molecules following photoexcitation at 265 nm. When combined with cutting edge ab initio electronic structure and molecular dynamics calculations of both the excited and ground state molecules, the results provide unprecedented insights into both electronic and nuclear dynamics of this fundamental class of reactions. The initial ring opening and non-adiabatic coupling to the electronic ground state is shown to be driven by ballistic SC bond extension and to be complete within 350 femtoseconds. Theory and experiment also allow clear visualization of the rich ground-state dynamics involving formation of, and interconversion between, several ring opened isomers and the reformed cyclic structure, and fragmentation (CO loss) over much longer timescales.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2020; v1 submitted 1 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
A self referencing attosecond interferometer with zeptosecond precision
Authors:
Jan Troß,
Georgios Kolliopoulos,
Carlos A. Trallero-Herrero
Abstract:
In this work we demonstrate the generation of two intense, ultrafast laser pulses that allow a controlled interferometric measurement of higher harmonic generation pulses with 12.8 attoseconds in resolution (half the atomic unit of time) and a precision as low as 680 zeptoseconds ($10^{-21}$ seconds). We create two replicas of a driving femtosecond pulse which share the same optical path except at…
▽ More
In this work we demonstrate the generation of two intense, ultrafast laser pulses that allow a controlled interferometric measurement of higher harmonic generation pulses with 12.8 attoseconds in resolution (half the atomic unit of time) and a precision as low as 680 zeptoseconds ($10^{-21}$ seconds). We create two replicas of a driving femtosecond pulse which share the same optical path except at the focus where they converge to two foci. An attosecond pulse train emerges from each focus through the process of HHG. The two attosecond pulse trains from each focus interfere in the far field producing a clear interference pattern in the XUV region. By controlling the relative optical phase between the two driving laser pulses we are able to actively influence the delay between the pulses and are able to perform very stable and precise pump-probe experiments. Because of the phase operation occurs across the entire spatial profile we effectively create two indistinguishable intense laser pulses or a common path interferometer for attosecond pulses. Commonality across the two beams means that they are extremely stable to environmental and mechanical fluctuations up to a Rayleigh range from the focus. In our opinion this represents an ideal source for homodyne and heterodyne spectroscopic measurements with sub-attosecond precision.
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.