-
Transient frailty induced by cell division. Observation, reasons and implications
Authors:
Zengru Di,
Eduardo M. Garcia-Roger,
Peter Richmond,
Bertrand M. Roehner,
Stephane Tronche
Abstract:
We know that stress-factors, e.g. X-rays, have an effect on cells that is more lethal in rapid exponential growth than in stationary phase. It is this effect which makes radiotherapy effective in cancer treatment. This stress effect can be explained in two ways: (a) more vulnerability in the growth phase, (b) improved protection capacity and repair mechanisms in the stationary phase. Although the…
▽ More
We know that stress-factors, e.g. X-rays, have an effect on cells that is more lethal in rapid exponential growth than in stationary phase. It is this effect which makes radiotherapy effective in cancer treatment. This stress effect can be explained in two ways: (a) more vulnerability in the growth phase, (b) improved protection capacity and repair mechanisms in the stationary phase. Although the two explanations do not exclude each other, they are very different in the sense that (a) is a general mechanism whereas (b) is strain and stress-factor dependent. In this paper we explore major facets of (a). Firstly, we emphasize that (a) can account for known experimental stress-factor evidence. Secondly, we observe that (a) rightly predicts that slow exponential growth (meaning with a doubling time of several hours) results in a lower death rate than fast exponential growth (doubling time of a fraction of one hour), an effect that cannot be explained in the (b) framework because both organisms are in the same phase. Thirdly, we conjecture that the stress-factor effect can be extended to situations of chronic stress due to non-optimal environmental conditions. If correct, this conjecture would imply that even in normal culture conditions the natural death rate is lower in the stationary phase than in the growth phase. Finally, the paper closes with the description of several open questions and of appropriate test-experiments meant to address them.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Congenital anomalies from a physics perspective. The key role of "manufacturing" volatility
Authors:
Alex Bois,
Eduardo M. Garcia-Roger,
Elim Hong,
Stefan Hutzler,
Ali Irannezhad,
Abdelkrim Mannioui,
Peter Richmond,
Bertrand M. Roehner,
Stephane Tronche
Abstract:
Genetic and environmental factors are traditionally seen as the sole causes of congenital anomalies. In this paper we introduce a third possible cause, namely random "manufacturing" discrepancies with respect to ``design'' values. A clear way to demonstrate the existence of this component is to ``shut'' the two others and to see whether or not there is remaining variability. Perfect clones raised…
▽ More
Genetic and environmental factors are traditionally seen as the sole causes of congenital anomalies. In this paper we introduce a third possible cause, namely random "manufacturing" discrepancies with respect to ``design'' values. A clear way to demonstrate the existence of this component is to ``shut'' the two others and to see whether or not there is remaining variability. Perfect clones raised under well controlled laboratory conditions fulfill the conditions for such a test. Carried out for four different species, the test reveals a variability remainder of the order of 10%-20% in terms of coefficient of variation. As an example, the CV of the volume of E.coli bacteria immediately after binary fission is of the order of 10%. In short, ``manufacturing'' discrepancies occur randomly, even when no harmful mutation or environmental factors are involved. Not surprisingly, there is a strong connection between congenital defects and infant mortality. In the wake of birth there is a gradual elimination of defective units and this screening accounts for the post-natal fall of infant mortality. Apart from this trend, post-natal death rates also have humps and peaks associated with various inabilities and defects.\qL In short, infant mortality rates convert the case-by-case and mostly qualitative problem of congenital malformations into a global quantitative effect which, so to say, summarizes and registers what goes wrong in the embryonic phase. Based on the natural assumption that for simple organisms (e.g. rotifers) the manufacturing processes are shorter than for more complex organisms (e.g. mammals), fewer congenital anomalies are expected. Somehow, this feature should be visible on the infant mortality rate. How this conjecture can be tested is outlined in our conclusion.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Infant mortality across species. A global probe of congenital abnormalities
Authors:
Alex Bois,
Eduardo M. Garcia-Roger,
Elim Hong,
Stefan Hutzler,
Ali Irannezhad,
Abdelkrim Mannioui,
Peter Richmond,
Bertrand M. Roehner,
Stephane Tronche
Abstract:
Infant mortality, by which we understand the postnatal stage during which mortality is declining, is a manifestation and embodiment of congenital abnormalities. Severe defects will translate into death occurring shortly after birth whereas slighter anomalies may contribute to death much later, possibly only in adult age. While for many species birth defects would be nearly impossible to identify,…
▽ More
Infant mortality, by which we understand the postnatal stage during which mortality is declining, is a manifestation and embodiment of congenital abnormalities. Severe defects will translate into death occurring shortly after birth whereas slighter anomalies may contribute to death much later, possibly only in adult age. While for many species birth defects would be nearly impossible to identify, infant mortality provides a convenient global assessment. In the present paper we examine a broad range of species from mammals to fish to gastropods to insects. One of the objectives of our comparative analysis is to test a conjecture suggested by reliability engineering according to which the frequency of defects tends to increase together with the complexity of organisms. For that purpose, we set up experiments specially designed to measure infant mortality. In particular, we two species commonly used as model species in biological laboratories, namely the zebrafish Danio rerio and the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. For the second, whose number of cells is about hundred times smaller than for the first, we find as expected that the screening effect of the infant phase is of much smaller amplitude. Our analysis also raises a number of challenging questions for which further investigation is necessary. For instance, why is the infant death rate of beetles and mollusks falling off exponentially rather than as a power law as observed for most other species? A possible research agenda is discussed in the conclusion of the paper.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.