Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Triantafillou, P

Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition

Authors: Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Kairouz, Fabian Pedregosa, Jamie Hayes, Meghdad Kurmanji, Kairan Zhao, Vincent Dumoulin, Julio Jacques Junior, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Jun Wan, Lisheng Sun Hosoya, Sergio Escalera, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Peter Triantafillou, Isabelle Guyon

Abstract: We present the findings of the first NeurIPS competition on unlearning, which sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms and initiate discussions on formal and robust evaluation methodologies. The competition was highly successful: nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated, and a wealth of novel, imaginative solutions with different characteristics were contributed. In thi… ▽ More We present the findings of the first NeurIPS competition on unlearning, which sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms and initiate discussions on formal and robust evaluation methodologies. The competition was highly successful: nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated, and a wealth of novel, imaginative solutions with different characteristics were contributed. In this paper, we analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning, which itself is a research problem. The evaluation methodology we developed for the competition measures forgetting quality according to a formal notion of unlearning, while incorporating model utility for a holistic evaluation. We analyze the effectiveness of different instantiations of this evaluation framework vis-a-vis the associated compute cost, and discuss implications for standardizing evaluation. We find that the ranking of leading methods remains stable under several variations of this framework, pointing to avenues for reducing the cost of evaluation. Overall, our findings indicate progress in unlearning, with top-performing competition entries surpassing existing algorithms under our evaluation framework. We analyze trade-offs made by different algorithms and strengths or weaknesses in terms of generalizability to new datasets, paving the way for advancing both benchmarking and algorithm development in this important area. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it

Authors: Kairan Zhao, Meghdad Kurmanji, George-Octavian Bărbulescu, Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Machine unlearning is the problem of removing the effect of a subset of training data (the ''forget set'') from a trained model without damaging the model's utility e.g. to comply with users' requests to delete their data, or remove mislabeled, poisoned or otherwise problematic data. With unlearning research still being at its infancy, many fundamental open questions exist: Are there interpretable… ▽ More Machine unlearning is the problem of removing the effect of a subset of training data (the ''forget set'') from a trained model without damaging the model's utility e.g. to comply with users' requests to delete their data, or remove mislabeled, poisoned or otherwise problematic data. With unlearning research still being at its infancy, many fundamental open questions exist: Are there interpretable characteristics of forget sets that substantially affect the difficulty of the problem? How do these characteristics affect different state-of-the-art algorithms? With this paper, we present the first investigation aiming to answer these questions. We identify two key factors affecting unlearning difficulty and the performance of unlearning algorithms. Evaluation on forget sets that isolate these identified factors reveals previously-unknown behaviours of state-of-the-art algorithms that don't materialize on random forget sets. Based on our insights, we develop a framework coined Refined-Unlearning Meta-algorithm (RUM) that encompasses: (i) refining the forget set into homogenized subsets, according to different characteristics; and (ii) a meta-algorithm that employs existing algorithms to unlearn each subset and finally delivers a model that has unlearned the overall forget set. We find that RUM substantially improves top-performing unlearning algorithms. Overall, we view our work as an important step in (i) deepening our scientific understanding of unlearning and (ii) revealing new pathways to improving the state-of-the-art. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

To Each (Textual Sequence) Its Own: Improving Memorized-Data Unlearning in Large Language Models

Authors: George-Octavian Barbulescu, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: LLMs have been found to memorize training textual sequences and regurgitate verbatim said sequences during text generation time. This fact is known to be the cause of privacy and related (e.g., copyright) problems. Unlearning in LLMs then takes the form of devising new algorithms that will properly deal with these side-effects of memorized data, while not hurting the model's utility. We offer a fr… ▽ More LLMs have been found to memorize training textual sequences and regurgitate verbatim said sequences during text generation time. This fact is known to be the cause of privacy and related (e.g., copyright) problems. Unlearning in LLMs then takes the form of devising new algorithms that will properly deal with these side-effects of memorized data, while not hurting the model's utility. We offer a fresh perspective towards this goal, namely, that each textual sequence to be forgotten should be treated differently when being unlearned based on its degree of memorization within the LLM. We contribute a new metric for measuring unlearning quality, an adversarial attack showing that SOTA algorithms lacking this perspective fail for privacy, and two new unlearning methods based on Gradient Ascent and Task Arithmetic, respectively. A comprehensive performance evaluation across an extensive suite of NLP tasks then mapped the solution space, identifying the best solutions under different scales in model capacities and forget set sizes and quantified the gains of the new approaches. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Published as a conference paper at ICML 2024

The GraphTempo Framework for Exploring the Evolution of a Graph through Pattern Aggregation

Authors: Evangelia Tsoukanara, Georgia Koloniari, Evaggelia Pitoura, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: When the focus is on the relationships or interactions between entities, graphs offer an intuitive model for many real-world data. Such graphs are usually large and change over time, thus, requiring models and strategies that explore their evolution. We study the evolution of aggregated graphs and introduce the GraphTempo model that allows temporal and attribute aggregation not only on node level… ▽ More When the focus is on the relationships or interactions between entities, graphs offer an intuitive model for many real-world data. Such graphs are usually large and change over time, thus, requiring models and strategies that explore their evolution. We study the evolution of aggregated graphs and introduce the GraphTempo model that allows temporal and attribute aggregation not only on node level by grou** individual nodes, but on a pattern level as well, where subgraphs are grouped together. Furthermore, We propose an efficient strategy for exploring the evolution of the graph based on identifying time intervals of significant growth, shrinkage or stability. Finally, we evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach using three real graphs. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2024; v1 submitted 25 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Machine Unlearning in Learned Databases: An Experimental Analysis

Authors: Meghdad Kurmanji, Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Machine learning models based on neural networks (NNs) are enjoying ever-increasing attention in the DB community. However, an important issue has been largely overlooked, namely the challenge of dealing with the highly dynamic nature of DBs, where data updates are fundamental, highly-frequent operations. Although some recent research has addressed the issues of maintaining updated NN models in th… ▽ More Machine learning models based on neural networks (NNs) are enjoying ever-increasing attention in the DB community. However, an important issue has been largely overlooked, namely the challenge of dealing with the highly dynamic nature of DBs, where data updates are fundamental, highly-frequent operations. Although some recent research has addressed the issues of maintaining updated NN models in the presence of new data insertions, the effects of data deletions (a.k.a., "machine unlearning") remain a blind spot. With this work, for the first time to our knowledge, we pose and answer the following key questions: What is the effect of unlearning algorithms on NN-based DB models? How do these effects translate to effects on downstream DB tasks, such as selectivity estimation (SE), approximate query processing (AQP), data generation (DG), and upstream tasks like data classification (DC)? What metrics should we use to assess the impact and efficacy of unlearning algorithms in learned DBs? Is the problem of machine unlearning in DBs different from that of machine learning in DBs in the face of data insertions? Is the problem of machine unlearning for DBs different from unlearning in the ML literature? what are the overhead and efficiency of unlearning algorithms? What is the sensitivity of unlearning on batching delete operations? If we have a suitable unlearning algorithm, can we combine it with an algorithm handling data insertions en route to solving the general adaptability/updatability requirement in learned DBs in the face of both data inserts and deletes? We answer these questions using a comprehensive set of experiments, various unlearning algorithms, a variety of downstream DB tasks, and an upstream task (DC), each with different NNs, and using a variety of metrics on a variety of real datasets, making this also a first key step towards a benchmark for learned DB unlearning. △ Less

Submitted 28 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Accepted as a conference paper at SIGMOD 2024

Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning

Authors: Meghdad Kurmanji, Peter Triantafillou, Jamie Hayes, Eleni Triantafillou

Abstract: Deep machine unlearning is the problem of `removing' from a trained neural network a subset of its training set. This problem is very timely and has many applications, including the key tasks of removing biases (RB), resolving confusion (RC) (caused by mislabelled data in trained models), as well as allowing users to exercise their `right to be forgotten' to protect User Privacy (UP). This paper i… ▽ More Deep machine unlearning is the problem of `removing' from a trained neural network a subset of its training set. This problem is very timely and has many applications, including the key tasks of removing biases (RB), resolving confusion (RC) (caused by mislabelled data in trained models), as well as allowing users to exercise their `right to be forgotten' to protect User Privacy (UP). This paper is the first, to our knowledge, to study unlearning for different applications (RB, RC, UP), with the view that each has its own desiderata, definitions for `forgetting' and associated metrics for forget quality. For UP, we propose a novel adaptation of a strong Membership Inference Attack for unlearning. We also propose SCRUB, a novel unlearning algorithm, which is the only method that is consistently a top performer for forget quality across the different application-dependent metrics for RB, RC, and UP. At the same time, SCRUB is also consistently a top performer on metrics that measure model utility (i.e. accuracy on retained data and generalization), and is more efficient than previous work. The above are substantiated through a comprehensive empirical evaluation against previous state-of-the-art. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2023; v1 submitted 20 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Detect, Distill and Update: Learned DB Systems Facing Out of Distribution Data

Authors: Meghdad Kurmanji, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) is changing DBs as many DB components are being replaced by ML models. One open problem in this setting is how to update such ML models in the presence of data updates. We start this investigation focusing on data insertions (dominating updates in analytical DBs). We study how to update neural network (NN) models when new data follows a different distribution (a.k.a. it is "o… ▽ More Machine Learning (ML) is changing DBs as many DB components are being replaced by ML models. One open problem in this setting is how to update such ML models in the presence of data updates. We start this investigation focusing on data insertions (dominating updates in analytical DBs). We study how to update neural network (NN) models when new data follows a different distribution (a.k.a. it is "out-of-distribution" -- OOD), rendering previously-trained NNs inaccurate. A requirement in our problem setting is that learned DB components should ensure high accuracy for tasks on old and new data (e.g., for approximate query processing (AQP), cardinality estimation (CE), synthetic data generation (DG), etc.). This paper proposes a novel updatability framework (DDUp). DDUp can provide updatability for different learned DB system components, even based on different NNs, without the high costs to retrain the NNs from scratch. DDUp entails two components: First, a novel, efficient, and principled statistical-testing approach to detect OOD data. Second, a novel model updating approach, grounded on the principles of transfer learning with knowledge distillation, to update learned models efficiently, while still ensuring high accuracy. We develop and showcase DDUp's applicability for three different learned DB components, AQP, CE, and DG, each employing a different type of NN. Detailed experimental evaluation using real and benchmark datasets for AQP, CE, and DG detail DDUp's performance advantages. △ Less

Submitted 8 December, 2022; v1 submitted 11 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a conference paper for SIGMOD 2023

Graphical Join: A New Physical Join Algorithm for RDBMSs

Authors: Ali Mohammadi Shanghooshabad, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Join operations (especially n-way, many-to-many joins) are known to be time- and resource-consuming. At large scales, with respect to table and join-result sizes, current state of the art approaches (including both binary-join plans which use Nested-loop/Hash/Sort-merge Join algorithms or, alternatively, worst-case optimal join algorithms (WOJAs)), may even fail to produce any answer given reasona… ▽ More Join operations (especially n-way, many-to-many joins) are known to be time- and resource-consuming. At large scales, with respect to table and join-result sizes, current state of the art approaches (including both binary-join plans which use Nested-loop/Hash/Sort-merge Join algorithms or, alternatively, worst-case optimal join algorithms (WOJAs)), may even fail to produce any answer given reasonable resource and time constraints. In this work, we introduce a new approach for n-way equi-join processing, the Graphical Join (GJ). The key idea is two-fold: First, to map the physical join computation problem to PGMs and introduce tweaked inference algorithms which can compute a Run-Length Encoding (RLE) based join-result summary, entailing all statistics necessary to materialize the join result. Second, and most importantly, to show that a join algorithm, like GJ, which produces the above join-result summary and then desummarizes it, can introduce large performance benefits in time and space. Comprehensive experimentation is undertaken with join queries from the JOB, TPCDS, and lastFM datasets, comparing GJ against PostgresQL and MonetDB and a state of the art WOJA implemented within the Umbra system. The results for in-memory join computation show performance improvements up to 64X, 388X, and 6X faster than PostgreSQL, MonetDB and Umbra, respectively. For on-disk join computation, GJ is faster than PostgreSQL, MonetDB and Umbra by up to 820X, 717X and 165X, respectively. Furthermore, GJ space needs are up to 21,488X, 38,333X, and 78,750X smaller than PostgresQL, MonetDB, and Umbra, respectively. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2022; v1 submitted 21 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 13 pages

Model Joins: Enabling Analytics Over Joins of Absent Big Tables

Authors: Ali Mohammadi Shanghooshabad, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: This work is motivated by two key facts. First, it is highly desirable to be able to learn and perform knowledge discovery and analytics (LKD) tasks without the need to access raw-data tables. This may be due to organizations finding it increasingly frustrating and costly to manage and maintain ever-growing tables, or for privacy reasons. Hence, compact models can be developed from the raw data an… ▽ More This work is motivated by two key facts. First, it is highly desirable to be able to learn and perform knowledge discovery and analytics (LKD) tasks without the need to access raw-data tables. This may be due to organizations finding it increasingly frustrating and costly to manage and maintain ever-growing tables, or for privacy reasons. Hence, compact models can be developed from the raw data and used instead of the tables. Second, oftentimes, LKD tasks are to be performed on a (potentially very large) table which is itself the result of joining separate (potentially very large) relational tables. But how can one do this, when the individual to-be-joined tables are absent? Here, we pose the following fundamental questions: Q1: How can one "join models" of (absent/deleted) tables or "join models with other tables" in a way that enables LKD as if it were performed on the join of the actual raw tables? Q2: What are appropriate models to use per table? Q3: As the model join would be an approximation of the actual data join, how can one evaluate the quality of the model join result? This work puts forth a framework, Model Join, addressing these challenges. The framework integrates and joins the per-table models of the absent tables and generates a uniform and independent sample that is a high-quality approximation of a uniform and independent sample of the actual raw-data join. The approximation stems from the models, but not from the Model Join framework. The sample obtained by the Model Join can be used to perform LKD downstream tasks, such as approximate query processing, classification, clustering, regression, association rule mining, visualization, and so on. To our knowledge, this is the first work with this agenda and solutions. Detailed experiments with TPC-DS data and synthetic data showcase Model Join's usefulness. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 12 pages

Weighted Random Sampling over Joins

Authors: Michael Shekelyan, Graham Cormode, Peter Triantafillou, Ali Shanghooshabad, Qingzhi Ma

Abstract: Joining records with all other records that meet a linkage condition can result in an astronomically large number of combinations due to many-to-many relationships. For such challenging (acyclic) joins, a random sample over the join result is a practical alternative to working with the oversized join result. Whereas prior works are limited to uniform join sampling where each join row is assigned t… ▽ More Joining records with all other records that meet a linkage condition can result in an astronomically large number of combinations due to many-to-many relationships. For such challenging (acyclic) joins, a random sample over the join result is a practical alternative to working with the oversized join result. Whereas prior works are limited to uniform join sampling where each join row is assigned the same probability, the scope is extended in this work to weighted sampling to support emerging applications such as scientific discovery in observational data and privacy-preserving query answering. Notwithstanding some naive methods, this work presents the first approach for weighted random sampling from join results. Due to a lack of baselines, experiments over various join types and real-world data sets are conducted to show substantial memory savings and competitive performance with main-memory index-based approaches in the equal-probability setting. In contrast to existing uniform sampling approaches that require prepared structures that occupy contested resources to squeeze out slightly faster query-times, the proposed approaches exhibit qualities that are urgently needed in practice, namely reduced memory footprint, streaming operation, support for selections, outer joins, semi joins and anti joins and unequal-probability sampling. All pertinent code and data can be found at: https://github.com/shekelyan/weightedjoinsampling △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: 14 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables

ML-AQP: Query-Driven Approximate Query Processing based on Machine Learning

Authors: Fotis Savva, Christos Anagnostopoulos, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: As more and more organizations rely on data-driven decision making, large-scale analytics become increasingly important. However, an analyst is often stuck waiting for an exact result. As such, organizations turn to Cloud providers that have infrastructure for efficiently analyzing large quantities of data. But, with increasing costs, organizations have to optimize their usage. Having a cheap alte… ▽ More As more and more organizations rely on data-driven decision making, large-scale analytics become increasingly important. However, an analyst is often stuck waiting for an exact result. As such, organizations turn to Cloud providers that have infrastructure for efficiently analyzing large quantities of data. But, with increasing costs, organizations have to optimize their usage. Having a cheap alternative that provides speed and efficiency will go a long way. Concretely, we offer a solution that can provide approximate answers to aggregate queries, relying on Machine Learning (ML), which is able to work alongside Cloud systems. Our developed lightweight ML-led system can be stored on an analyst's local machine or deployed as a service to instantly answer analytic queries, having low response times and monetary/computational costs and energy footprint. To accomplish this we leverage the knowledge obtained by previously answered queries and build ML models that can estimate the result of new queries in an efficient and inexpensive manner. The capabilities of our system are demonstrated using extensive evaluation with both real and synthetic datasets/workloads and well known benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Adaptive Learning of Aggregate Analytics under Dynamic Workloads

Authors: Fotis Savva, Christos Anagnostopoulos, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Large organizations have seamlessly incorporated data-driven decision making in their operations. However, as data volumes increase, expensive big data infrastructures are called to rescue. In this setting, analytics tasks become very costly in terms of query response time, resource consumption, and money in cloud deployments, especially when base data are stored across geographically distributed… ▽ More Large organizations have seamlessly incorporated data-driven decision making in their operations. However, as data volumes increase, expensive big data infrastructures are called to rescue. In this setting, analytics tasks become very costly in terms of query response time, resource consumption, and money in cloud deployments, especially when base data are stored across geographically distributed data centers. Therefore, we introduce an adaptive Machine Learning mechanism which is light-weight, stored client-side, can estimate the answers of a variety of aggregate queries and can avoid the big data backend. The estimations are performed in milliseconds are inexpensive and accurate as the mechanism learns from past analytical-query patterns. However, as analytic queries are ad-hoc and analysts' interests change over time we develop solutions that can swiftly and accurately detect such changes and adapt to new query patterns. The capabilities of our approach are demonstrated using extensive evaluation with real and synthetic datasets. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2020; v1 submitted 13 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: 12 pages, 9 figures

Explaining Aggregates for Exploratory Analytics

Authors: Fotis Savva, Christos Anagnostopoulos, Peter Triantafillou

Abstract: Analysts wishing to explore multivariate data spaces, typically pose queries involving selection operators, i.e., range or radius queries, which define data subspaces of possible interest and then use aggregation functions, the results of which determine their exploratory analytics interests. However, such aggregate query (AQ) results are simple scalars and as such, convey limited information abou… ▽ More Analysts wishing to explore multivariate data spaces, typically pose queries involving selection operators, i.e., range or radius queries, which define data subspaces of possible interest and then use aggregation functions, the results of which determine their exploratory analytics interests. However, such aggregate query (AQ) results are simple scalars and as such, convey limited information about the queried subspaces for exploratory analysis. We address this shortcoming aiding analysts to explore and understand data subspaces by contributing a novel explanation mechanism coined XAXA: eXplaining Aggregates for eXploratory Analytics. XAXA's novel AQ explanations are represented using functions obtained by a three-fold joint optimization problem. Explanations assume the form of a set of parametric piecewise-linear functions acquired through a statistical learning model. A key feature of the proposed solution is that model training is performed by only monitoring AQs and their answers on-line. In XAXA, explanations for future AQs can be computed without any database (DB) access and can be used to further explore the queried data subspaces, without issuing any more queries to the DB. We evaluate the explanation accuracy and efficiency of XAXA through theoretically grounded metrics over real-world and synthetic datasets and query workloads. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2020; v1 submitted 29 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: 13 pages

ART : Sub-Logarithmic Decentralized Range Query Processing with Probabilistic Guarantees

Authors: Spyros Sioutas, Peter Triantafillou, George Papaloukopoulos, Evangelos Sakkopoulos, Kostas Tsichlas, Yannis Manolopoulos

Abstract: We focus on range query processing on large-scale, typically distributed infrastructures, such as clouds of thousands of nodes of shared-datacenters, of p2p distributed overlays, etc. In such distributed environments, efficient range query processing is the key for managing the distributed data sets per se, and for monitoring the infrastructure's resources. We wish to develop an architecture that… ▽ More We focus on range query processing on large-scale, typically distributed infrastructures, such as clouds of thousands of nodes of shared-datacenters, of p2p distributed overlays, etc. In such distributed environments, efficient range query processing is the key for managing the distributed data sets per se, and for monitoring the infrastructure's resources. We wish to develop an architecture that can support range queries in such large-scale decentralized environments and can scale in terms of the number of nodes as well as in terms of the data items stored. Of course, in the last few years there have been a number of solutions (mostly from researchers in the p2p domain) for designing such large-scale systems. However, these are inadequate for our purposes, since at the envisaged scales the classic logarithmic complexity (for point queries) is still too expensive while for range queries it is even more disappointing. In this paper we go one step further and achieve a sub-logarithmic complexity. We contribute the ART, which outperforms the most popular decentralized structures, including Chord (and some of its successors), BATON (and its successor) and Skip-Graphs. We contribute theoretical analysis, backed up by detailed experimental results, showing that the communication cost of query and update operations is $O(\log_{b}^2 \log N)$ hops, where the base $b$ is a double-exponentially power of two and $N$ is the total number of nodes. Moreover, ART is a fully dynamic and fault-tolerant structure, which supports the join/leave node operations in $O(\log \log N)$ expected w.h.p number of hops. Our experimental performance studies include a detailed performance comparison which showcases the improved performance, scalability, and robustness of ART. △ Less

Submitted 13 January, 2012; originally announced January 2012.

Comments: Submitted to Distributed and Parallel Databases (DAPD) Journal, Springer