-
On total domination subdivision numbers of trees
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The total domination number $γ_t(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of $G$. The total domination subdivision number $\mbox{sd}_{γ_t}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in $G$ can be subdivided at most onc…
▽ More
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The total domination number $γ_t(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of $G$. The total domination subdivision number $\mbox{sd}_{γ_t}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in $G$ can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Haynes et al. (Discrete Math. 286 (2004) 195--202) have given a constructive characterization of trees whose total domination subdivision number is~$3$. In this paper, we give new characterizations of trees whose total domination subdivision number is 3.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Characterization of $α$-excellent $2$-trees
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A graph is $α$-excellent if every vertex of the graph is contained in some maximum independent set of the graph. In this paper, we present two characterizations of the $α$-excellent $2$-trees.
A graph is $α$-excellent if every vertex of the graph is contained in some maximum independent set of the graph. In this paper, we present two characterizations of the $α$-excellent $2$-trees.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
On $α$-excellent graphs
Authors:
M. Dettlaff,
M. A. Henning,
J. Topp
Abstract:
A graph $G$ is $α$-excellent if every vertex of $G$ is contained in some maximum independent set of $G$. In this paper, we characterize $α$-excellent bipartite graphs, $α$-excellent unicyclic graphs, $α$-excellent simplicial graphs, $α$-excellent chordal graphs, $α$-excellent block graphs, and we show that every generalized Petersen graph is $α$-excellent.
A graph $G$ is $α$-excellent if every vertex of $G$ is contained in some maximum independent set of $G$. In this paper, we characterize $α$-excellent bipartite graphs, $α$-excellent unicyclic graphs, $α$-excellent simplicial graphs, $α$-excellent chordal graphs, $α$-excellent block graphs, and we show that every generalized Petersen graph is $α$-excellent.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Common domination perfect graphs
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex that does not belong to $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. The common independence number $α_c(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest integer $r$ such that every vertex of $G$ belongs to some independent set of cardinality at least~$r$. The…
▽ More
A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex that does not belong to $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. The common independence number $α_c(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest integer $r$ such that every vertex of $G$ belongs to some independent set of cardinality at least~$r$. The common independence number is squeezed between the independent domination number $i(G)$ and the independence number $α(G)$ of $G$, that is, $γ(G) \le i(G) \le α_c(G) \le α(G)$. A graph $G$ is domination perfect if $γ(H) = i(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. We define a graph $G$ as common domination perfect if $γ(H) = α_c(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. We provide a characterization of common domination perfect graphs in terms of ten forbidden induced subgraphs.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
How a 4-day Work Week affects Agile Software Development Teams
Authors:
Julia Topp,
Jan Hendrik Hille,
Michael Neumann,
David Mötefindt
Abstract:
Context: Agile software development (ASD) sets social aspects like communication and collaboration in focus. Thus, one may assume that the specific work organization of companies impacts the work of ASD teams. A major change in work organization is the switch to a 4-day work week, which some companies investigated in experiments. Also, recent studies show that ASD teams are affected by the switch…
▽ More
Context: Agile software development (ASD) sets social aspects like communication and collaboration in focus. Thus, one may assume that the specific work organization of companies impacts the work of ASD teams. A major change in work organization is the switch to a 4-day work week, which some companies investigated in experiments. Also, recent studies show that ASD teams are affected by the switch to remote work since the Covid 19 pandemic outbreak in 2020. Objective: Our study presents empirical findings on the effects on ASD teams operating remote in a 4-day work week organization. Method: We performed a qualitative single case study and conducted seven semi-structured interviews, observed 14 agile practices and screened eight project documents and protocols of agile practices. Results: We found, that the teams adapted the agile method in use due to the change to a 4-day work week environment and the switch to remote work. The productivity of the two ASD teams did not decrease. Although the stress level of the ASD team member increased due to the 4-day work week, we found that the job satisfaction of the individual ASD team members is affected positively. Finally, we point to affects on social facets of the ASD teams. Conclusions: The research community benefits from our results as the current state of research dealing with the effects of a 4-day work week on ASD teams is limited. Also, our findings provide several practical implications for ASD teams working remote in a 4-day work week.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Graphs with disjoint 2-dominating sets
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex belonging to $V_G\setminus D$ is joined by at least two edges with a vertex or vertices in $D$. A graph $G$ is a $(2,2)$-dominated graph if it has a pair $(D,D')$ of disjoint $2$-dominating sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we p…
▽ More
A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex belonging to $V_G\setminus D$ is joined by at least two edges with a vertex or vertices in $D$. A graph $G$ is a $(2,2)$-dominated graph if it has a pair $(D,D')$ of disjoint $2$-dominating sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we present two characterizations of minimal $(2,2)$-dominated graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Minimal graphs with disjoint dominating and total dominating sets
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A graph $G$ is a DTDP-graph if it has a pair $(D,T)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $T$ is a total dominating set of $G$. Such graphs were studied in a number of research papers. In this paper we study further properties of DTDP-graphs and, in particular, we characterize minimal DTDP-gaphs without loops.
A graph $G$ is a DTDP-graph if it has a pair $(D,T)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $T$ is a total dominating set of $G$. Such graphs were studied in a number of research papers. In this paper we study further properties of DTDP-graphs and, in particular, we characterize minimal DTDP-gaphs without loops.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Minimal graphs with disjoint dominating and paired-dominating sets
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ has a~neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a~dominating set and the subgraph induced by $D$ contains a perfect matching. A graph $G$ is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph if it has a pair $(D,P)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $P$ is a paired-dominating set…
▽ More
A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ has a~neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a~dominating set and the subgraph induced by $D$ contains a perfect matching. A graph $G$ is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph if it has a pair $(D,P)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $P$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$. The study of the $D\!P\!D\!P$-graphs was initiated by Southey and Henning (Cent. Eur. J. Math. 8 (2010) 459--467; J. Comb. Optim. 22 (2011) 217--234). In this paper, we provide conditions which ensure that a graph is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph. In particular, we characterize the minimal $D\!P\!D\!P$-graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Disjoint dominating and 2-dominating sets in graphs
Authors:
Mateusz Miotk,
Jerzy Topp,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
A graph $G$ is a $D\!D_2$-graph if it has a pair $(D,D_2)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $D_2$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$. We provide several characterizations and hardness results concerning $D\!D_2$-graphs.
A graph $G$ is a $D\!D_2$-graph if it has a pair $(D,D_2)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $D_2$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$. We provide several characterizations and hardness results concerning $D\!D_2$-graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Bipartization of graphs
Authors:
Mateusz Miotk,
Jerzy Topp,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D\subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$, and the domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. In this paper we provide a new characterization of bipartite graphs whose domination number is equal to the cardinality of its smaller partite set. Our characterization i…
▽ More
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D\subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$, and the domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. In this paper we provide a new characterization of bipartite graphs whose domination number is equal to the cardinality of its smaller partite set. Our characterization is based upon a new graph operation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Graphs with equal domination and covering numbers
Authors:
Andrzej Lingas,
Mateusz Miotk,
Jerzy Topp,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D\subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$, and the domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A set $C\subseteq V_G$ is a covering set of $G$ if every edge of $G$ has at least one vertex in $C$. The covering number $β(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a cov…
▽ More
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D\subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$, and the domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A set $C\subseteq V_G$ is a covering set of $G$ if every edge of $G$ has at least one vertex in $C$. The covering number $β(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a covering set of $G$. The set of connected graphs $G$ for which $γ(G)=β(G)$ is denoted by ${\cal C}_{γ=β}$, while ${\cal B}$ denotes the set of all connected bipartite graphs in which the domination number is equal to the cardinality of the smaller partite set. In this paper, we provide alternative characterizations of graphs belonging to ${\cal C}_{γ=β}$ and ${\cal B}$. Next, we present a quadratic time algorithm for recognizing bipartite graphs belonging to ${\cal B}$, and, as a side result, we conclude that the algorithm of Arumugam et al. [2] allows to recognize all the graphs belonging to the set ${\cal C}_{γ=β}$ in quadratic time either. Finally, we consider the related problem of patrolling grids with mobile guards, and show that this problem can be solved in $O(n \log n + m)$ time, where $n$ is the number of line segments of the input grid and $m$ is the number of its intersection points.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2018; v1 submitted 25 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
On domination perfect graphs
Authors:
Jerzy Topp,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
Let $γ(G)$ and $β(G)$ denote the domination number and the covering number of a graph $G$, respectively. A connected non-trivial graph $G$ is said to be $γβ$-{perfect} if $γ(H)=β(H)$ for every non-trivial induced connected subgraph $H$ of $G$. In this note we present an elementary proof of a characterization of the $γβ$-perfect graphs.
Let $γ(G)$ and $β(G)$ denote the domination number and the covering number of a graph $G$, respectively. A connected non-trivial graph $G$ is said to be $γβ$-{perfect} if $γ(H)=β(H)$ for every non-trivial induced connected subgraph $H$ of $G$. In this note we present an elementary proof of a characterization of the $γβ$-perfect graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
On accurate domination in graphs
Authors:
Joanna Cyman,
Michael A. Henning,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a subset $D \subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the domination number of $G$. The accurate domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{\rm a}(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $D$ that is a dominating set of $G$ and no $|D|$-elem…
▽ More
A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a subset $D \subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the domination number of $G$. The accurate domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{\rm a}(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $D$ that is a dominating set of $G$ and no $|D|$-element subset of $V_G \setminus D$ is a dominating set of $G$. We study graphs for which the accurate domination number is equal to the domination number. In particular, all trees $G$ for which $γ_{\rm a}(G) = γ(G)$ are characterized. Furthermore, we compare the accurate domination number with the domination number of different coronas of a graph.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Graphs with equal domination and certified domination numbers
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Magdalena Lemańska,
Mateusz Miotk,
Jerzy Topp,
Radosław Ziemann,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The domination number (upper domination number, respectively) of a graph $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$ ($Γ(G)$, respectively), is the cardinality of a smallest (largest minimal, respectively) dominating set of $G$. A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is called a certified dominating…
▽ More
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The domination number (upper domination number, respectively) of a graph $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$ ($Γ(G)$, respectively), is the cardinality of a smallest (largest minimal, respectively) dominating set of $G$. A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is called a certified dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set of $G$ and every vertex in $D$ has either zero or at least two neighbors in $V_G-D$. The cardinality of a~smallest (largest minimal, respectively) certified dominating set of $G$ is called the certified upper certified, respectively domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{\rm cer}(G)$ ($Γ_{\rm cer}(G)$, respectively). In this paper relations between domination, upper domination, certified domination and upper certified domination numbers of a graph are studied.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2017; v1 submitted 5 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Certified domination
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Magdalena Lemańska,
Jerzy Topp,
Radosław Ziemann,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
Imagine that we are given a set $D$ of officials and a set $W$ of civils. For each civil $x \in W$, there must be an official $v \in D$ that can serve $x$, and whenever any such $v$ is serving $x$, there must also be another civil $w \in W$ that observes $v$, that is, $w$ may act as a kind of witness, to avoid any abuse from $v$. What is the minimum number of officials to guarantee such a service,…
▽ More
Imagine that we are given a set $D$ of officials and a set $W$ of civils. For each civil $x \in W$, there must be an official $v \in D$ that can serve $x$, and whenever any such $v$ is serving $x$, there must also be another civil $w \in W$ that observes $v$, that is, $w$ may act as a kind of witness, to avoid any abuse from $v$. What is the minimum number of officials to guarantee such a service, assuming a given social network?
In this paper, we introduce the concept of certified domination that perfectly models the aforementioned problem. Specifically, a dominating set $D$ of a graph $G=(V_G,E_G)$ is said to be certified if every vertex in $D$ has either zero or at least two neighbours in $V_G\setminus D$. The cardinality of a minimum certified dominating set in $G$ is called the certified domination number of $G$. Herein, we present the exact values of the certified domination number for some classes of graphs as well as provide some upper bounds on this parameter for arbitrary graphs. We then characterise a wide class of graphs with equal domination and certified domination numbers and characterise graphs with large values of certified domination numbers. Next, we examine the effects on the certified domination number when the graph is modified by deleting/adding an edge or a vertex. We also provide Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for the certified domination number. Finally, we show that the (decision) certified domination problem is NP-complete.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Coronas and domination subdivision number of a graph
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Magdalena Lemańska,
Jerzy Topp,
Paweł Żyliński
Abstract:
In this paper, for a graph G and a family of partitions P of vertex neighborhoods of G, we define the general corona G \circ P of G. Among several properties of this new operation, we focus on application general coronas to a new kind of characterization of trees with the domination subdivision number equal to 3.
In this paper, for a graph G and a family of partitions P of vertex neighborhoods of G, we define the general corona G \circ P of G. Among several properties of this new operation, we focus on application general coronas to a new kind of characterization of trees with the domination subdivision number equal to 3.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Hangable Graphs
Authors:
Mateusz Miotk,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
Let $G=(V_G,E_G)$ be a connected graph. The distance $d_G(u,v)$ between vertices $u$ and $v$ in $G$ is the length of a shortest $u-v$ path in $G$. The eccentricity of a vertex $v$ in $G$ is the integer $e_G(v)= \max\{ d_G(v,u) \colon u\in V_G\}$. The diameter of $G$ is the integer $d(G)= \max\{e_G(v)\colon v\in V_G\}$. The periphery of a~vertex $v$ of $G$ is the set…
▽ More
Let $G=(V_G,E_G)$ be a connected graph. The distance $d_G(u,v)$ between vertices $u$ and $v$ in $G$ is the length of a shortest $u-v$ path in $G$. The eccentricity of a vertex $v$ in $G$ is the integer $e_G(v)= \max\{ d_G(v,u) \colon u\in V_G\}$. The diameter of $G$ is the integer $d(G)= \max\{e_G(v)\colon v\in V_G\}$. The periphery of a~vertex $v$ of $G$ is the set $P_G(v)= \{u\in V_G\colon d_G(v,u)= e_G(v)\}$, while the periphery of $G$ is the set $P(G)= \{v\in V_G\colon e_G(v)=d(G)\}$. We say that graph $G$ is hangable if $P_G(v)\subequal P(G)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. In this paper we prove that every block graph is hangable and discuss the hangability of products of graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Domination subdivision and domination multisubdivision numbers of graphs
Authors:
Magda Dettlaff,
Joanna Raczek,
Jerzy Topp
Abstract:
The \emph{domination subdivision number} sd$(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where an edge can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the domination number of $G$. It has been shown \cite{vel} that sd$(T)\leq 3$ for any tree $T$. We prove that the decision problem of the domination subdivision number is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. For…
▽ More
The \emph{domination subdivision number} sd$(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where an edge can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the domination number of $G$. It has been shown \cite{vel} that sd$(T)\leq 3$ for any tree $T$. We prove that the decision problem of the domination subdivision number is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. For this reason we define the \emph{domination multisubdivision number} of a nonempty graph $G$ as a minimum positive integer $k$ such that there exists an edge which must be subdivided $k$ times to increase the domination number of $G$. We show that msd$(G)\leq 3$ for any graph $G$. The domination subdivision number and the domination multisubdivision numer of a graph are incomparable in general case, but we show that for trees these two parameters are equal. We also determine domination multisubdivision number for some classes of graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2013; v1 submitted 4 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Spin Wave Diffraction and Perfect Imaging of a Grating
Authors:
S. Mansfeld,
J. Topp,
K. Martens,
J. N. Toedt,
W. Hansen,
D. Heitmann,
S. Mendach
Abstract:
We study the diffraction of Damon-Eshbach-type spin waves incident on a one-dimensional grating realized by micro slits in a thin permalloy film. By means of time-resolved scanning Kerr microscopy we observe unique diffraction patterns behind the grating which exhibit replications of the spin-wave field at the slits. We show that these spin-wave images, with details finer than the wavelength of th…
▽ More
We study the diffraction of Damon-Eshbach-type spin waves incident on a one-dimensional grating realized by micro slits in a thin permalloy film. By means of time-resolved scanning Kerr microscopy we observe unique diffraction patterns behind the grating which exhibit replications of the spin-wave field at the slits. We show that these spin-wave images, with details finer than the wavelength of the incident Damon-Eshbach spin wavelength, arise from the strongly anisotropic spin wave dispersion.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
-
Spin-wave interference in three-dimensional rolled-up ferromagnetic microtubes
Authors:
Felix Balhorn,
Sebastian Mansfeld,
Andreas Krohn,
Jesco Topp,
Wolfgang Hansen,
Detlef Heitmann,
Stefan Mendach
Abstract:
We have investigated spin-wave excitations in rolled-up Permalloy microtubes using microwave absorption spectroscopy. We find a series of quantized azimuthal modes which arise from the constructive interference of Damon-Eshbach type spin waves propagating around the circumference of the microtubes, forming a spin-wave resonator. The mode spectrum can be tailored by the tube's radius and number o…
▽ More
We have investigated spin-wave excitations in rolled-up Permalloy microtubes using microwave absorption spectroscopy. We find a series of quantized azimuthal modes which arise from the constructive interference of Damon-Eshbach type spin waves propagating around the circumference of the microtubes, forming a spin-wave resonator. The mode spectrum can be tailored by the tube's radius and number of rolled-up layers.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
-
Observation of spin-wave propagation in permalloy microstripes
Authors:
Andreas Krohn,
Sebastian Mansfeld,
Jan Podbielski,
Jesco Topp,
Wolfgang Hansen,
Detlef Heitmann,
Stefan Mendach
Abstract:
We report on the propagation of spin waves in permalloy microstripes. By means of scanning Kerr microscopy combined with continuous microwave excitation, we detect the time evolution of spin-wave interference patterns in an external magnetic field. Assuming transverse spin-wave quantization we can directly measure the amplitude, phase velocity and dam** for the corresponding transversal wave m…
▽ More
We report on the propagation of spin waves in permalloy microstripes. By means of scanning Kerr microscopy combined with continuous microwave excitation, we detect the time evolution of spin-wave interference patterns in an external magnetic field. Assuming transverse spin-wave quantization we can directly measure the amplitude, phase velocity and dam** for the corresponding transversal wave mode numbers m. We find that the spin-wave interference pattern is dominated by m=0 and m=2 with phase velocities v_0=71 km/s and v_2=47 km/s, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2009;
originally announced May 2009.
