Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Tibrewal, K

Aligning long-term climate mitigation with enhanced methane action

Authors: Katsumasa Tanaka, Kushal Tibrewal, Philippe Ciais, Olivier Boucher

Abstract: The Global Methane Pledge and other methane measures may potentially undermine CO2 mitigation in certain countries, unless they are considered as additional to the existing Nationally Determined Contributions to strengthen overall greenhouse gas emission targets. Maintaining the progress on CO2 mitigation in the revision of Nationally Determined Contributions after the first Global Stocktake, whil… ▽ More The Global Methane Pledge and other methane measures may potentially undermine CO2 mitigation in certain countries, unless they are considered as additional to the existing Nationally Determined Contributions to strengthen overall greenhouse gas emission targets. Maintaining the progress on CO2 mitigation in the revision of Nationally Determined Contributions after the first Global Stocktake, while pursuing the immediate benefits from methane mitigation, is necessary to address climate change in the long-term. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Transparent framework to assess the revision of climate pledges after the first Global Stocktake

Authors: Kushal Tibrewal, Katsumasa Tanaka, Philippe Ciais, Olivier Boucher

Abstract: To assess the impact of potential future climate pledges after the first Global Stocktake, we propose a simple, transparent framework for develo** emission and temperature scenarios by country. We show that current pledges with unconditional targets lead to global warming of 1.96 (1.39-2.6) degree C by 2100. Further warming could be limited through i) commitment to mid-century net-zero targets f… ▽ More To assess the impact of potential future climate pledges after the first Global Stocktake, we propose a simple, transparent framework for develo** emission and temperature scenarios by country. We show that current pledges with unconditional targets lead to global warming of 1.96 (1.39-2.6) degree C by 2100. Further warming could be limited through i) commitment to mid-century net-zero targets for all countries and earlier net-zero targets for developed countries, ii) enhancement of the Global Methane Pledge, and iii) ambitious implementation of the Glasgow Leaders Declaration on Forests and Land Use. Our analysis further shows that overshooting 1.5 degree C is unavoidable, even with supplementary climate engineering strategies, suggesting the need for strategies to limit further overshoot and ultimately reduce the warming towards 1.5 degree C. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.