Overcoming challenges of translating deep-learning models for glioblastoma: the ZGBM consortium
Authors:
Haris Shuaib,
Gareth J Barker,
Peter Sasieni,
Enrico De Vita,
Alysha Chelliah,
Roman Andrei,
Keyoumars Ashkan,
Erica Beaumont,
Lucy Brazil,
Chris Rowland-Hill,
Yue Hui Lau,
Aysha Luis,
James Powell,
Angela Swampillai,
Sean Tenant,
Stefanie C Thust,
Stephen Wastling,
Tom Young,
Thomas C Booth
Abstract:
Objective: To report imaging protocol and scheduling variance in routine care of glioblastoma patients in order to demonstrate challenges of integrating deep-learning models in glioblastoma care pathways. Additionally, to understand the most common imaging studies and image contrasts to inform the development of potentially robust deep-learning models. Methods: MR imaging data were analysed from a…
▽ More
Objective: To report imaging protocol and scheduling variance in routine care of glioblastoma patients in order to demonstrate challenges of integrating deep-learning models in glioblastoma care pathways. Additionally, to understand the most common imaging studies and image contrasts to inform the development of potentially robust deep-learning models. Methods: MR imaging data were analysed from a random sample of five patients from the prospective cohort across five participating sites of the ZGBM consortium. Reported clinical and treatment data alongside DICOM header information were analysed to understand treatment pathway imaging schedules. Results: All sites perform all structural imaging at every stage in the pathway except for the presurgical study, where in some sites only contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging is performed. Diffusion MRI is the most common non-structural imaging type, performed at every site. Conclusion: The imaging protocol and scheduling varies across the UK, making it challenging to develop machine-learning models that could perform robustly at other centres. Structural imaging is performed most consistently across all centres. Advances in knowledge: Successful translation of deep-learning models will likely be based on structural post-treatment imaging unless there is significant effort made to standardise non-structural or peri-operative imaging protocols and schedules.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
A Modality-Adaptive Method for Segmenting Brain Tumors and Organs-at-Risk in Radiation Therapy Planning
Authors:
Mikael Agn,
Per Munck af Rosenschöld,
Oula Puonti,
Michael J. Lundemann,
Laura Mancini,
Anastasia Papadaki,
Steffi Thust,
John Ashburner,
Ian Law,
Koen Van Leemput
Abstract:
In this paper we present a method for simultaneously segmenting brain tumors and an extensive set of organs-at-risk for radiation therapy planning of glioblastomas. The method combines a contrast-adaptive generative model for whole-brain segmentation with a new spatial regularization model of tumor shape using convolutional restricted Boltzmann machines. We demonstrate experimentally that the meth…
▽ More
In this paper we present a method for simultaneously segmenting brain tumors and an extensive set of organs-at-risk for radiation therapy planning of glioblastomas. The method combines a contrast-adaptive generative model for whole-brain segmentation with a new spatial regularization model of tumor shape using convolutional restricted Boltzmann machines. We demonstrate experimentally that the method is able to adapt to image acquisitions that differ substantially from any available training data, ensuring its applicability across treatment sites; that its tumor segmentation accuracy is comparable to that of the current state of the art; and that it captures most organs-at-risk sufficiently well for radiation therapy planning purposes. The proposed method may be a valuable step towards automating the delineation of brain tumors and organs-at-risk in glioblastoma patients undergoing radiation therapy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2018; v1 submitted 18 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
