-
Counterfactual harm
Authors:
Jonathan G. Richens,
Rory Beard,
Daniel H. Thompson
Abstract:
To act safely and ethically in the real world, agents must be able to reason about harm and avoid harmful actions. However, to date there is no statistical method for measuring harm and factoring it into algorithmic decisions. In this paper we propose the first formal definition of harm and benefit using causal models. We show that any factual definition of harm must violate basic intuitions in ce…
▽ More
To act safely and ethically in the real world, agents must be able to reason about harm and avoid harmful actions. However, to date there is no statistical method for measuring harm and factoring it into algorithmic decisions. In this paper we propose the first formal definition of harm and benefit using causal models. We show that any factual definition of harm must violate basic intuitions in certain scenarios, and show that standard machine learning algorithms that cannot perform counterfactual reasoning are guaranteed to pursue harmful policies following distributional shifts. We use our definition of harm to devise a framework for harm-averse decision making using counterfactual objective functions. We demonstrate this framework on the problem of identifying optimal drug doses using a dose-response model learned from randomized control trial data. We find that the standard method of selecting doses using treatment effects results in unnecessarily harmful doses, while our counterfactual approach allows us to identify doses that are significantly less harmful without sacrificing efficacy.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2022; v1 submitted 27 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
SaLinA: Sequential Learning of Agents
Authors:
Ludovic Denoyer,
Alfredo de la Fuente,
Song Duong,
Jean-Baptiste Gaya,
Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny,
Daniel H. Thompson
Abstract:
SaLinA is a simple library that makes implementing complex sequential learning models easy, including reinforcement learning algorithms. It is built as an extension of PyTorch: algorithms coded with \SALINA{} can be understood in few minutes by PyTorch users and modified easily. Moreover, SaLinA naturally works with multiple CPUs and GPUs at train and test time, thus being a good fit for the large…
▽ More
SaLinA is a simple library that makes implementing complex sequential learning models easy, including reinforcement learning algorithms. It is built as an extension of PyTorch: algorithms coded with \SALINA{} can be understood in few minutes by PyTorch users and modified easily. Moreover, SaLinA naturally works with multiple CPUs and GPUs at train and test time, thus being a good fit for the large-scale training use cases. In comparison to existing RL libraries, SaLinA has a very low adoption cost and capture a large variety of settings (model-based RL, batch RL, hierarchical RL, multi-agent RL, etc.). But SaLinA does not only target RL practitioners, it aims at providing sequential learning capabilities to any deep learning programmer.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Masking schemes for universal marginalisers
Authors:
Divya Gautam,
Maria Lomeli,
Kostis Gourgoulias,
Daniel H. Thompson,
Saurabh Johri
Abstract:
We consider the effect of structure-agnostic and structure-dependent masking schemes when training a universal marginaliser (arXiv:1711.00695) in order to learn conditional distributions of the form $P(x_i |\mathbf x_{\mathbf b})$, where $x_i$ is a given random variable and $\mathbf x_{\mathbf b}$ is some arbitrary subset of all random variables of the generative model of interest. In other words,…
▽ More
We consider the effect of structure-agnostic and structure-dependent masking schemes when training a universal marginaliser (arXiv:1711.00695) in order to learn conditional distributions of the form $P(x_i |\mathbf x_{\mathbf b})$, where $x_i$ is a given random variable and $\mathbf x_{\mathbf b}$ is some arbitrary subset of all random variables of the generative model of interest. In other words, we mimic the self-supervised training of a denoising autoencoder, where a dataset of unlabelled data is used as partially observed input and the neural approximator is optimised to minimise reconstruction loss. We focus on studying the underlying process of the partially observed data---how good is the neural approximator at learning all conditional distributions when the observation process at prediction time differs from the masking process during training? We compare networks trained with different masking schemes in terms of their predictive performance and generalisation properties.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
