-
Experimental measurement of respiratory particles dispersed by wind instruments and analysis of the associated risk of infection transmission
Authors:
Oliver Schlenczek,
Birte Thiede,
Laura Turco,
Katja Stieger,
Jana M. Kosub,
Rudolf Müller,
Simone Scheithauer,
Eberhard Bodenschatz,
Gholamhossein Bagheri
Abstract:
Activities such as singing or playing a wind instrument release respiratory particles into the air that may contain pathogens and thus pose a risk for infection transmission. Here we report measurements of the size distribution, number, and volume concentration of exhaled particles from 31 healthy musicians playing 20 types of wind instruments using aerosol spectrometry and in-line holography in a…
▽ More
Activities such as singing or playing a wind instrument release respiratory particles into the air that may contain pathogens and thus pose a risk for infection transmission. Here we report measurements of the size distribution, number, and volume concentration of exhaled particles from 31 healthy musicians playing 20 types of wind instruments using aerosol spectrometry and in-line holography in a strictly controlled cleanroom environment. We find that playing wind instruments carries a lower risk of airborne disease transmission than speaking or singing. We attribute this to the fact that the resonators of wind instruments act as filters for particles >10 $μ$m in diameter. We have also measured the size-dependent filtering properties of different types of filters that can be used as instrument masks. Based on these measurements, we calculated the risk of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different near- and far-field scenarios with and without masking and/or distancing. We conclude that in all cases where there is a possibility that the musician is infectious, the only safe measure to prevent airborne transmission of the disease is the use of well-fitting and well-filtering masks for the instrument and the susceptible person.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Face-masks save us from SARS-CoV-2 transmission
Authors:
Gholamhossein Bagheri,
Birte Thiede,
Bardia Hejazi,
Oliver Schlenczek,
Eberhard Bodenschatz
Abstract:
We present results on the infection risk from SARS-CoV-2 under different scenarios based on measured particle size-dependent mask penetration, measured total inward leakage, measured human aerosol emission for sizes from 10nm to 1mm, and re-hydration on inhalation. Well-mixed room models significantly underestimate the risk of infection for short and direct exposure. To this end, we estimate the u…
▽ More
We present results on the infection risk from SARS-CoV-2 under different scenarios based on measured particle size-dependent mask penetration, measured total inward leakage, measured human aerosol emission for sizes from 10nm to 1mm, and re-hydration on inhalation. Well-mixed room models significantly underestimate the risk of infection for short and direct exposure. To this end, we estimate the upper bound for infection risk with the susceptible in the infectious exhalation cloud or wearing masks by having the masked susceptible inhale the entire exhalation of a masked infectious. Social distances without a mask, even at 3m between speaking individuals results in an upper bound of 90\% for risk of infection after a few minutes. If both wear a surgical mask, the risk of infection for the person speaking remains below 26\% even after 60 minutes. When both the infectious and susceptible wear a well-fitting FFP2 mask, the upper bound for risk is reduced by a factor of 60 compared to surgical masks. In both cases, face leakage is very important. For FFP2 masks, leakage is low in the nasal region and directed upward, which can be further reduced significantly by applying double-sided medical tape there. Considering that the calculated upper bound greatly overestimates the risk of infection, and the fact that with a poorly worn mask even the upper bound we calculated is very low, we conclude that wearing a mask, even with some leakage, provides excellent third party and self-protection.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
On the risk of infection by infectious aerosols in large indoor spaces
Authors:
Bardia Hejazi,
Oliver Schlenczek,
Birte Thiede,
Gholamhossein Bagheri,
Eberhard Bodenschatz
Abstract:
Airborne diseases can be transmitted by infectious aerosols in the near field, i.e., in close proximity, or in the far field, i.e., by infectious aerosols that are well mixed within the indoor air. Is it possible to say which mode of disease transmission is predominant in large indoor spaces? We addressed this question by measuring the transport of aerosols equivalent to the size of human respirat…
▽ More
Airborne diseases can be transmitted by infectious aerosols in the near field, i.e., in close proximity, or in the far field, i.e., by infectious aerosols that are well mixed within the indoor air. Is it possible to say which mode of disease transmission is predominant in large indoor spaces? We addressed this question by measuring the transport of aerosols equivalent to the size of human respiratory particles in two large hardware stores (V>10000 m$^3$). We found that aerosol concentrations in both stores decreased rapidly and almost independently of aerosol size, despite the different ventilation systems. A persistent and directional airflow on the order of a few cm/s was observed in both stores. Consequently, aerosol dynamics in such open settings can be expected to be dominated by turbulent dispersion and swee**, and the accumulation of infectious aerosols in the indoor air is unlikely to contribute significantly to the risk of infection as long as the occupancy of the store is not too high. Under these conditions, well-fitting face masks are an excellent means of preventing disease transmission by human aerosols.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2022; v1 submitted 20 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
