Advancing Standards-Free Methods for the Identification of Small Molecules in Complex Samples
Authors:
Jamie R. Nuñez,
Sean M. Colby,
Dennis G. Thomas,
Malak M. Tfaily,
Nikola Tolic,
Elin M. Ulrich,
Jon R. Sobus,
Thomas O. Metz,
Justin G. Teeguarden,
Ryan S. Renslow
Abstract:
The current gold standard for unambiguous identification in metabolomics analysis is based on comparing two or more orthogonal properties from the analysis of authentic, pure reference materials (standards) to experimental data acquired in the same laboratory with the same analytical methods. This represents a significant limitation for comprehensive chemical identification of small molecules in c…
▽ More
The current gold standard for unambiguous identification in metabolomics analysis is based on comparing two or more orthogonal properties from the analysis of authentic, pure reference materials (standards) to experimental data acquired in the same laboratory with the same analytical methods. This represents a significant limitation for comprehensive chemical identification of small molecules in complex samples since this process is time-consuming and costly, and the majority of molecules are not yet represented by standards, leading to a need for standards-free identification. To address this need, we are advancing chemical property calculations and develo** multi-attribute scoring and matching algorithms to utilize data from multiple analytical platforms through the utilization and creation of the in silico Chemical Library Engine (ISiCLE) and the Multi-Attribute Matching Engine (MAME). Here, we describe our results in a blinded analysis of synthetic chemical mixtures as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Non-Targeted Analysis Collaborative Trial (ENTACT). The blinded false negative rate (FNR), false discovery rate (FDR), and accuracy were 57%, 77%, and 91%, respectively. For high confidence identifications, the FDR was 35%. After unblinding of the sample compositions, we improved our approach by optimizing the scoring parameters used to increase confidence. The final FNR, FDR, and accuracy were 67%, 53%, and 96%, respectively. For high confidence identifications, the FDR was 10%. This study demonstrates that standards-free small molecule identification and multi-attribute matching methods can significantly reduce reliance on standards.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
