-
Galaxy Distribution Systems as Fractals
Authors:
Sharon Teles
Abstract:
This work tests if the large-scale galaxy distribution can be characterized as a fractal system. The $Λ$CDM cosmology with $H_0=(70\pm 5)$ km/s/Mpc is adopted to study the UltraVISTA DR1, COSMOS2015 and SPLASH surveys, alongside the number density equations of these galaxy distribution systems as fractals with dimension D. The relativistic distance definitions $d_L$, $d_Z$ and $d_G$ are used to es…
▽ More
This work tests if the large-scale galaxy distribution can be characterized as a fractal system. The $Λ$CDM cosmology with $H_0=(70\pm 5)$ km/s/Mpc is adopted to study the UltraVISTA DR1, COSMOS2015 and SPLASH surveys, alongside the number density equations of these galaxy distribution systems as fractals with dimension D. The relativistic distance definitions $d_L$, $d_Z$ and $d_G$ are used to estimate the galaxy number densities in the redshift interval $0.1 \leq z \leq 4$ at volume limited subsamples. Applying the appropriate relations for the description of galaxy fractal structures with single dimension $D$ in the relativistic settings to these surveys datasets it is possible to state that for $z<1$ the UltraVISTA DR1 galaxies presented an average of $D=(1.58\pm 0.20)$, the COSMOS2015 galaxies produced $D=(1.39\pm 0.19)$ and the SPLASH galaxies generated $D=(1.00\pm 0.12)$. For $1 \leq z \leq 4$ the dimensions respectively decreased to $D=(0.59\pm 0.28)$, $D=0.54^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ and $D=0.83^{+0.36}_{-0.37}$. These results are robust under the Hubble constant uncertainty assumed here. Analysis of blue and red galaxies subsamples in the COSMOS2015 and SPLASH surveys show that the fractal dimensions of blue galaxies present essentially no alteration from the values above, although the ones for the red galaxies changed mostly to smaller values, meaning that D may be assumed as a more intrinsic property of the distribution of objects in the Universe, thus allowing for the fractal dimension to be used as a tool to study different populations of galaxies. All results confirm the decades old theoretical prediction of a decrease in the fractal dimension for $z>1$ suggesting that either there are yet unclear observational biases causing such decrease in the fractal dimension, or the galaxy clustering was possibly more sparse and the universe void dominated in a not too distant past.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Galaxy Distributions as Fractal Systems
Authors:
Sharon Teles,
Amanda R. Lopes,
Marcelo B. Ribeiro
Abstract:
This paper discusses if large scale galaxy distribution samples containing almost one million objects can be characterized as fractal systems. The analysis performed by Teles et al. (2021; arXiv:2012.07164) on the UltraVISTA DR1 survey is extended here to the SPLASH and COSMOS2015 catalogs, hence adding 750k new galaxies with measured redshifts to the studied samples. The standard $Λ$CDM cosmology…
▽ More
This paper discusses if large scale galaxy distribution samples containing almost one million objects can be characterized as fractal systems. The analysis performed by Teles et al. (2021; arXiv:2012.07164) on the UltraVISTA DR1 survey is extended here to the SPLASH and COSMOS2015 catalogs, hence adding 750k new galaxies with measured redshifts to the studied samples. The standard $Λ$CDM cosmology having $H_0=(70\pm5)$ km/s/Mpc and number density tools required for describing these galaxy distributions as single fractal systems with dimension $D$ are adopted. We use the luminosity distance $d_L$, redshift distance $d_z$ and galaxy area distance (transverse comoving distance) $d_G$ as relativistic distance definitions to derive galaxy number densities in the redshift interval $0.1\le z\le4$ at volume limited subsamples defined by absolute magnitudes in the K-band. Similar to the findings of Teles et al. (2021; arXiv:2012.07164), the results show two consecutive redshift scales where galaxy distribution data behave as single fractal structures. For $z<1$ we found $D=1.00\pm0.12$ for the SPLASH galaxies, and $D=1,39\pm0.19$ for the COSMOS2015. For $1\le z\le4$ we respectively found $D=0.83^{+0.36}_{-0.37}$ and $D=0.54^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$. These results were verified to be robust under the assumed Hubble constant uncertainty. Calculations considering blue and red galaxies subsamples in both surveys showed that the fractal dimensions of blue galaxies as basically unchanged, but the ones for the red galaxies changed mostly to smaller values, meaning that $D$ may be seen as a more intrinsic property of the distribution of objects in the Universe, therefore allowing for the fractal dimension to be used as a tool to study different populations of galaxies. All results confirm the decades old theoretical prediction of a decrease in the fractal dimension for $z>1$.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Localization in Quantum Walks with a Single Lattice Defect: A Comparative Study
Authors:
Laurita I. da S. Teles,
Edgard P. M. Amorim
Abstract:
We study how a single lattice defect in a discrete time quantum walk affects the return probability of a quantum particle. This defect at the starting position is modeled by a quantum coin that is distinct from the others over the lattice. This coin has a dependence on $ω$ which quantifies the intensity of the localization. For some sorts of lattice defects, we show how the localization can have a…
▽ More
We study how a single lattice defect in a discrete time quantum walk affects the return probability of a quantum particle. This defect at the starting position is modeled by a quantum coin that is distinct from the others over the lattice. This coin has a dependence on $ω$ which quantifies the intensity of the localization. For some sorts of lattice defects, we show how the localization can have a dependence just on $ω$, and also, the polar $α$ and azimuth $β$ angles of the initial qubit by numerical calculations. We propose a lattice defect whose localization has additional dependence on $β+ω$, leading to extra localization profiles. We compare the quantum walks with our lattice defect to the earlier ones, and we discuss their spreading and survival probability.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Fractal Analysis of the UltraVISTA Galaxy Survey
Authors:
Sharon Teles,
Amanda R. Lopes,
Marcelo B. Ribeiro
Abstract:
This paper seeks to test if the large-scale galaxy distribution can be characterized as a fractal system. Tools appropriate for describing galaxy fractal structures with a single fractal dimension $D$ in relativistic settings are developed and applied to the UltraVISTA galaxy survey. A graph of volume-limited samples corresponding to the redshift limits in each redshift bins for absolute magnitude…
▽ More
This paper seeks to test if the large-scale galaxy distribution can be characterized as a fractal system. Tools appropriate for describing galaxy fractal structures with a single fractal dimension $D$ in relativistic settings are developed and applied to the UltraVISTA galaxy survey. A graph of volume-limited samples corresponding to the redshift limits in each redshift bins for absolute magnitude is presented. Fractal analysis using the standard $Λ$CDM cosmological model is applied to a reduced subsample in the range $0.1\le z \le 4$, and the entire sample within $0.1\le z\le 6$. Three relativistic distances are used, the luminosity distance $d_L$, redshift distance $d_z$ and galaxy area distance $d_G$, because for data at $z\gtrsim 0.3$ relativistic effects are such that for the same $z$ these distance definitions yield different values. The results show two consecutive and distinct redshift ranges in both the reduced and complete samples where the data behave as a single fractal galaxy structure. For the reduced subsample we found that the fractal dimension is $D=\left(1.58\pm0.20\right)$ for $z<1$, and $D=\left(0.59\pm0.28\right)$ for $1\le z\le 4$. The complete sample yielded $D=\left(1.63\pm0.20\right)$ for $z<1$ and $D=\left(0.52\pm0.29\right)$ for $1\le z\le6$. These results are consistent with those found by Conde-Saavedra et al. (2015; arXiv:1409.5409v1), where a similar analysis was applied to a much more limited survey at equivalent redshift depths, and suggest that either there are yet unclear observational biases causing such decrease in the fractal dimension, or the galaxy clustering was possibly more sparse and the universe void dominated in a not too distant past.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
