The Calibration Gap between Model and Human Confidence in Large Language Models
Authors:
Mark Steyvers,
Heliodoro Tejeda,
Aakriti Kumar,
Catarina Belem,
Sheer Karny,
Xinyue Hu,
Lukas Mayer,
Padhraic Smyth
Abstract:
For large language models (LLMs) to be trusted by humans they need to be well-calibrated in the sense that they can accurately assess and communicate how likely it is that their predictions are correct. Recent work has focused on the quality of internal LLM confidence assessments, but the question remains of how well LLMs can communicate this internal model confidence to human users. This paper ex…
▽ More
For large language models (LLMs) to be trusted by humans they need to be well-calibrated in the sense that they can accurately assess and communicate how likely it is that their predictions are correct. Recent work has focused on the quality of internal LLM confidence assessments, but the question remains of how well LLMs can communicate this internal model confidence to human users. This paper explores the disparity between external human confidence in an LLM's responses and the internal confidence of the model. Through experiments involving multiple-choice questions, we systematically examine human users' ability to discern the reliability of LLM outputs. Our study focuses on two key areas: (1) assessing users' perception of true LLM confidence and (2) investigating the impact of tailored explanations on this perception. The research highlights that default explanations from LLMs often lead to user overestimation of both the model's confidence and its' accuracy. By modifying the explanations to more accurately reflect the LLM's internal confidence, we observe a significant shift in user perception, aligning it more closely with the model's actual confidence levels. This adjustment in explanatory approach demonstrates potential for enhancing user trust and accuracy in assessing LLM outputs. The findings underscore the importance of transparent communication of confidence levels in LLMs, particularly in high-stakes applications where understanding the reliability of AI-generated information is essential.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Quantization for the mixtures of overlap probability distributions
Authors:
Asha Barua,
Angelina Chavera,
Ivan Djordjevic,
Valerie Manzano,
Sergio Soto Quintero,
Mrinal Kanti Roychowdhury,
Hilda Tejeda
Abstract:
Mixtures of probability distributions, also known as mixed distributions, are an exciting new area for optimal quantization. In this paper, we have considered a mixed distribution which is generated by overlap uniform distributions. For this mixed distribution we determine the optimal sets of $n$-means and the $n$th quantization errors for all positive integers $n$.
Mixtures of probability distributions, also known as mixed distributions, are an exciting new area for optimal quantization. In this paper, we have considered a mixed distribution which is generated by overlap uniform distributions. For this mixed distribution we determine the optimal sets of $n$-means and the $n$th quantization errors for all positive integers $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
