-
Response to "On the giant deformation and ferroelectricity of guanidinium nitrate" by Marek Szafrański and Andrzej Katrusiak
Authors:
Durga Prasad Karothu,
Rodrigo Ferreira,
Ghada Dushaq,
Ejaz Ahmed,
Luca Catalano,
Jad Mahmoud Halabi,
Zainab Alhaddad,
Ibrahim Tahir,
Liang Li,
Sharmarke Mohamed,
Mahmoud Rasras,
Panče Naumov
Abstract:
Following a well-established practice of publishing commentaries to articles of other authors who work on materials that were earlier studied by them (n.b. six published comments[1-6]), Marek Szafrański(MS) and Andrzej Katrusiak (AK) have filed on the preprint server arXiv a manuscript entitled "On the giant deformation and ferroelectricity of guanidinium nitrate"[7] with comments on our article "…
▽ More
Following a well-established practice of publishing commentaries to articles of other authors who work on materials that were earlier studied by them (n.b. six published comments[1-6]), Marek Szafrański(MS) and Andrzej Katrusiak (AK) have filed on the preprint server arXiv a manuscript entitled "On the giant deformation and ferroelectricity of guanidinium nitrate"[7] with comments on our article "Exceptionally high work density of a ferroelectric dynamic organic crystal around room temperature" published in Nature Communications (2022, 13, 2823).[8] Both in the submitted comment as well as in the required (by the journal) direct communication with us preceding its posting, MS and AK have expressed dissatisfaction with the choice of literature references in our article, for which they felt that their previous work on this material has not been cited to a sufficient extent. In their comment, they summarize their other remarks on our article as "the structural determinations of GN [guanidinium nitrate] crystals, their phase transitions and associated giant deformation, as well as its detailed structural mechanism, the molecular dynamics and dielectric properties were reported before, while the semiconductivity, ferroelectricity, and fatigue resistance of the GN [guanidinium nitrate] crystals cannot be confirmed."[7] Apart from the sentiments of MS and AK on our choice of cited literature, we find their comments on the scientific content of our article to be strongly biased towards their own results and unfounded. Below, we provide a detailed response to their comments.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2023; v1 submitted 7 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
On Flattened Parking Functions
Authors:
Jennifer Elder,
Pamela E. Harris,
Zoe Markman,
Izah Tahir,
Amanda Verga
Abstract:
A permutation of length $n$ is called a flattened partition if the leading terms of maximal chains of ascents (called runs) are in increasing order. We analogously define flattened parking functions: a subset of parking functions for which the leading terms of maximal chains of weak ascents (also called runs) are in weakly increasing order. For $n\leq 8$, where there are at most four runs, we give…
▽ More
A permutation of length $n$ is called a flattened partition if the leading terms of maximal chains of ascents (called runs) are in increasing order. We analogously define flattened parking functions: a subset of parking functions for which the leading terms of maximal chains of weak ascents (also called runs) are in weakly increasing order. For $n\leq 8$, where there are at most four runs, we give data for the number of flattened parking functions, and it remains an open problem to give formulas for their enumeration in general. We then specialize to a subset of flattened parking functions that we call $\mathcal{S}$-insertion flattened parking functions. These are obtained by inserting all numbers of a multiset $ \mathcal{S}$ whose elements are in $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$, into a permutation of $[n]$ and checking that the result is flattened. We provide bijections between $\mathcal{S}$-insertion flattened parking functions and $\mathcal{S}'$-insertion flattened parking functions, where $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{S}'$ have certain relations. We then further specialize to the case $\mathcal{S}=\textbf{1}_r$, the multiset with $r$ ones, and we establish a bijection between $\textbf{1}_r$-insertion flattened parking functions and set partitions of $[n+r]$ with the first $r$ integers in different subsets.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023; v1 submitted 25 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
$n$-bridge braids and the braid index
Authors:
Dane Gollero,
Siddhi Krishna,
Marissa Loving,
Viridiana Neri,
Izah Tahir,
Len White
Abstract:
In this work, we find a closed form formula for the braid index of an $n$-bridge braid, a class of positive braid knots which simultaneously generalizes torus knots, 1-bridge braids, and twisted torus knots. Our proof is elementary, effective, and self-contained, and partially recovers work of Birman--Kofman. Along the way, we show that the disparate definitions of twisted torus knots in the liter…
▽ More
In this work, we find a closed form formula for the braid index of an $n$-bridge braid, a class of positive braid knots which simultaneously generalizes torus knots, 1-bridge braids, and twisted torus knots. Our proof is elementary, effective, and self-contained, and partially recovers work of Birman--Kofman. Along the way, we show that the disparate definitions of twisted torus knots in the literature agree.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023; v1 submitted 29 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Global Wheat Head Dataset 2021: more diversity to improve the benchmarking of wheat head localization methods
Authors:
Etienne David,
Mario Serouart,
Daniel Smith,
Simon Madec,
Kaaviya Velumani,
Shouyang Liu,
Xu Wang,
Francisco Pinto Espinosa,
Shahameh Shafiee,
Izzat S. A. Tahir,
Hisashi Tsujimoto,
Shuhei Nasuda,
Bangyou Zheng,
Norbert Kichgessner,
Helge Aasen,
Andreas Hund,
Pouria Sadhegi-Tehran,
Koichi Nagasawa,
Goro Ishikawa,
Sébastien Dandrifosse,
Alexis Carlier,
Benoit Mercatoris,
Ken Kuroki,
Haozhou Wang,
Masanori Ishii
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset was created in 2020 and has assembled 193,634 labelled wheat heads from 4,700 RGB images acquired from various acquisition platforms and 7 countries/institutions. With an associated competition hosted in Kaggle, GWHD has successfully attracted attention from both the computer vision and agricultural science communities. From this first experience in 2…
▽ More
The Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset was created in 2020 and has assembled 193,634 labelled wheat heads from 4,700 RGB images acquired from various acquisition platforms and 7 countries/institutions. With an associated competition hosted in Kaggle, GWHD has successfully attracted attention from both the computer vision and agricultural science communities. From this first experience in 2020, a few avenues for improvements have been identified, especially from the perspective of data size, head diversity and label reliability. To address these issues, the 2020 dataset has been reexamined, relabeled, and augmented by adding 1,722 images from 5 additional countries, allowing for 81,553 additional wheat heads to be added. We now release a new version of the Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset in 2021, which is bigger, more diverse, and less noisy than the 2020 version. The GWHD 2021 is now publicly available at http://www.global-wheat.com/ and a new data challenge has been organized on AIcrowd to make use of this updated dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2021; v1 submitted 17 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Crab cavities for linear colliders
Authors:
G. Burt,
P. Ambattu,
R. Carter,
A. Dexter,
I. Tahir,
C. Beard,
M. Dykes,
P. Goudket,
A. Kalinin,
L. Ma,
P. McIntosh,
D. Shulte,
R. M. Jones,
L. Bellantoni,
B. Chase,
M. Church,
T. Khabouline,
A. Latina,
C. Adolphsen,
Z. Li,
A. Seryei,
L. Xiao
Abstract:
Crab cavities have been proposed for a wide number of accelerators and interest in crab cavities has recently increased after the successful operation of a pair of crab cavities in KEK-B. In particular crab cavities are required for both the ILC and CLIC linear colliders for bunch alignment. Consideration of bunch structure and size constraints favour a 3.9 GHz superconducting, multi-cell cavity…
▽ More
Crab cavities have been proposed for a wide number of accelerators and interest in crab cavities has recently increased after the successful operation of a pair of crab cavities in KEK-B. In particular crab cavities are required for both the ILC and CLIC linear colliders for bunch alignment. Consideration of bunch structure and size constraints favour a 3.9 GHz superconducting, multi-cell cavity as the solution for ILC, whilst bunch structure and beam-loading considerations suggest an X-band copper travelling wave structure for CLIC. These two cavity solutions are very different in design but share complex design issues. Phase stabilisation, beam loading, wakefields and mode dam** are fundamental issues for these crab cavities. Requirements and potential design solutions will be discussed for both colliders.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2008;
originally announced October 2008.
