-
The Online Best Reply Algorithm for Resource Allocation Problems
Authors:
Max Klimm,
Daniel Schmand,
Andreas Tönnis
Abstract:
We study the performance of a best reply algorithm for online resource allocation problems with a diseconomy of scale. In an online resource allocation problem, we are given a set of resources and a set of requests that arrive in an online manner. Each request consists of a set of feasible allocations and an allocation is a set of resources. The total cost of an allocation vector is given by the s…
▽ More
We study the performance of a best reply algorithm for online resource allocation problems with a diseconomy of scale. In an online resource allocation problem, we are given a set of resources and a set of requests that arrive in an online manner. Each request consists of a set of feasible allocations and an allocation is a set of resources. The total cost of an allocation vector is given by the sum of the resources' costs, where each resource's cost depends on the total load on the resource under the allocation vector. We analyze the natural online procedure where each request is allocated greedily to a feasible set of resources that minimizes the individual cost of that particular request. In the literature, this algorithm is also known as a one-round walk-in congestion games starting from the empty state. For unweighted resource allocation problems with polynomial cost functions with maximum degree $d$, upper bounds on the competitive ratio of this greedy algorithm were known only for the special cases $d\in\{1, 2, 3\}$. In this paper, we show a general upper bound on the competitive ratio of $d(d / W(\frac{1.2d-1}{d+1}))^{d+1}$ for the unweighted case where $W$ denotes the Lambert-W function on $\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. For the weighted case, we show that the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm is bounded from above by $(d/W(\frac{d}{d+1}))^{d+1}$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2019; v1 submitted 7 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
A Collection of Lower Bounds for Online Matching on the Line
Authors:
Antonios Antoniadis,
Carsten Fischer,
Andreas Tönnis
Abstract:
In the online matching on the line problem, the task is to match a set of requests $R$ online to a given set of servers $S$. The distance metric between any two points in $R\,\cup\, S$ is a line metric and the objective for the online algorithm is to minimize the sum of distances between matched server-request pairs. This problem is well-studied and - despite recent improvements - there is still a…
▽ More
In the online matching on the line problem, the task is to match a set of requests $R$ online to a given set of servers $S$. The distance metric between any two points in $R\,\cup\, S$ is a line metric and the objective for the online algorithm is to minimize the sum of distances between matched server-request pairs. This problem is well-studied and - despite recent improvements - there is still a large gap between the best known lower and upper bounds: The best known deterministic algorithm for the problem is $O(\log^2n)$-competitive, while the best known deterministic lower bound is $9.001$. The lower and upper bounds for randomized algorithms are $4.5$ and $O(\log n)$ respectively.
We prove that any deterministic online algorithm which in each round: $(i)$ bases the matching decision only on information local to the current request, and $(ii)$ is symmetric (in the sense that the decision corresponding to the mirror image of some instance $I$ is the mirror image of the decision corresponding to instance $I$), must be $Ω(\log n)$-competitive. We then extend the result by showing that it also holds when relaxing the symmetry property so that the algorithm might prefer one side over the other, but only up to some degree. This proves a barrier of $Ω(\log n)$ on the competitive ratio for a large class of "natural" algorithms. This class includes all deterministic online algorithms found in the literature so far.
Furthermore, we show that our result can be extended to randomized algorithms that locally induce a symmetric distribution over the chosen servers. The $Ω(\log n)$-barrier on the competitive ratio holds for this class of algorithms as well.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Submodular Secretary Problems: Cardinality, Matching, and Linear Constraints
Authors:
Thomas Kesselheim,
Andreas Tönnis
Abstract:
We study various generalizations of the secretary problem with submodular objective functions. Generally, a set of requests is revealed step-by-step to an algorithm in random order. For each request, one option has to be selected so as to maximize a monotone submodular function while ensuring feasibility. For our results, we assume that we are given an offline algorithm computing an $α$-approximat…
▽ More
We study various generalizations of the secretary problem with submodular objective functions. Generally, a set of requests is revealed step-by-step to an algorithm in random order. For each request, one option has to be selected so as to maximize a monotone submodular function while ensuring feasibility. For our results, we assume that we are given an offline algorithm computing an $α$-approximation for the respective problem. This way, we separate computational limitations from the ones due to the online nature. When only focusing on the online aspect, we can assume $α= 1$.
In the submodular secretary problem, feasibility constraints are cardinality constraints. That is, out of a randomly ordered stream of entities, one has to select a subset size $k$. For this problem, we present a $0.31α$-competitive algorithm for all $k$, which asymptotically reaches competitive ratio $\fracα{e}$ for large $k$. In submodular secretary matching, one side of a bipartite graph is revealed online. Upon arrival, each node has to be matched permanently to an offline node or discarded irrevocably. We give an $\fracα{4}$-competitive algorithm. In both cases, we improve over previously best known competitive ratios, using a generalization of the algorithm for the classic secretary problem.
Furthermore, we give an $O(αd^{-\frac{2}{B-1}})$-competitive algorithm for submodular function maximization subject to linear packing constraints. Here, $d$ is the column sparsity, that is the maximal number of none-zero entries in a column of the constraint matrix, and $B$ is the minimal capacity of the constraints. Notably, this bound is independent of the total number of constraints. We improve the algorithm to be $O(αd^{-\frac{1}{B-1}})$-competitive if both $d$ and $B$ are known to the algorithm beforehand.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Think Eternally: Improved Algorithms for the Temp Secretary Problem and Extensions
Authors:
Thomas Kesselheim,
Andreas Tönnis
Abstract:
The \emph{Temp Secretary Problem} was recently introduced by Fiat et al. It is a generalization of the Secretary Problem, in which commitments are temporary for a fixed duration. We present a simple online algorithm with improved performance guarantees for cases already considered by Fiat et al.\ and give competitive ratios for new generalizations of the problem. In the classical setting, where ca…
▽ More
The \emph{Temp Secretary Problem} was recently introduced by Fiat et al. It is a generalization of the Secretary Problem, in which commitments are temporary for a fixed duration. We present a simple online algorithm with improved performance guarantees for cases already considered by Fiat et al.\ and give competitive ratios for new generalizations of the problem. In the classical setting, where candidates have identical contract durations $γ\ll 1$ and we are allowed to hire up to $B$ candidates simultaneously, our algorithm is $(\frac{1}{2} - O(\sqrtγ))$-competitive. For large $B$, the bound improves to $1 - O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{B}}\right) - O(\sqrtγ)$.
Furthermore we generalize the problem from cardinality constraints towards general packing constraints. We achieve a competitive ratio of $1 - O\left(\sqrt{\frac{(1+\log d + \log B)}{B}}\right) -O(\sqrtγ)$, where $d$ is the sparsity of the constraint matrix and $B$ is generalized to the capacity ratio of linear constraints. Additionally we extend the problem towards arbitrary hiring durations.
Our algorithmic approach is a relaxation that aggregates all temporal constraints into a non-temporal constraint. Then we apply a linear scaling algorithm that, on every arrival, computes a tentative solution on the input that is known up to this point. This tentative solution uses the non-temporal, relaxed constraints scaled down linearly by the amount of time that has already passed.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Hiring Secretaries over Time: The Benefit of Concurrent Employment
Authors:
Yann Disser,
John Fearnley,
Martin Gairing,
Oliver Göbel,
Max Klimm,
Daniel Schmand,
Alexander Skopalik,
Andreas Tönnis
Abstract:
We consider a stochastic online problem where $n$ applicants arrive over time, one per time step. Upon arrival of each applicant their cost per time step is revealed, and we have to fix the duration of employment, starting immediately. This decision is irrevocable, i.e., we can neither extend a contract nor dismiss a candidate once hired. In every time step, at least one candidate needs to be unde…
▽ More
We consider a stochastic online problem where $n$ applicants arrive over time, one per time step. Upon arrival of each applicant their cost per time step is revealed, and we have to fix the duration of employment, starting immediately. This decision is irrevocable, i.e., we can neither extend a contract nor dismiss a candidate once hired. In every time step, at least one candidate needs to be under contract, and our goal is to minimize the total hiring cost, which is the sum of the applicants' costs multiplied with their respective employment durations. We provide a competitive online algorithm for the case that the applicants' costs are drawn independently from a known distribution. Specifically, the algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of 2.965 for the case of uniform distributions. For this case, we give an analytical lower bound of 2 and a computational lower bound of 2.148. We then adapt our algorithm to stay competitive even in settings with one or more of the following restrictions: (i) at most two applicants can be hired concurrently; (ii) the distribution of the applicants' costs is unknown; (iii) the total number $n$ of time steps is unknown. On the other hand, we show that concurrent employment is a necessary feature of competitive algorithms by proving that no algorithm has a competitive ratio better than $Ω(\sqrt{n} / \log n)$ if concurrent employment is forbidden.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2017; v1 submitted 27 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Primal Beats Dual on Online Packing LPs in the Random-Order Model
Authors:
Thomas Kesselheim,
Klaus Radke,
Andreas Tönnis,
Berthold Vöcking
Abstract:
We study packing LPs in an online model where the columns are presented to the algorithm in random order. This natural problem was investigated in various recent studies motivated, e.g., by online ad allocations and yield management where rows correspond to resources and columns to requests specifying demands for resources. Our main contribution is a $1-O(\sqrt{(\log{d})/B})$-competitive online al…
▽ More
We study packing LPs in an online model where the columns are presented to the algorithm in random order. This natural problem was investigated in various recent studies motivated, e.g., by online ad allocations and yield management where rows correspond to resources and columns to requests specifying demands for resources. Our main contribution is a $1-O(\sqrt{(\log{d})/B})$-competitive online algorithm, where $d$ denotes the column sparsity, i.e., the maximum number of resources that occur in a single column, and $B$ denotes the capacity ratio $B$, i.e., the ratio between the capacity of a resource and the maximum demand for this resource. In other words, we achieve a $(1 - ε)$-approximation if the capacity ratio satisfies $B=Ω((\log d)/ε^2)$, which is known to be best-possible for any (randomized) online algorithms.
Our result improves exponentially on previous work with respect to the capacity ratio. In contrast to existing results on packing LP problems, our algorithm does not use dual prices to guide the allocation of resources. Instead, it simply solves, for each request, a scaled version of the partially known primal program and randomly rounds the obtained fractional solution to obtain an integral allocation for this request. We show that this simple algorithmic technique is not restricted to packing LPs with large capacity ratio: We prove an upper bound on the competitive ratio of $Ω(d^{-1/(B-1)})$, for any $B \ge 2$. In addition, we show that our approach can be combined with VCG payments and obtain an incentive compatible $(1-ε)$-competitive mechanism for packing LPs with $B=Ω((\log m)/ε^2)$, where $m$ is the number of constraints. Finally, we apply our technique to the generalized assignment problem for which we obtain the first online algorithm with competitive ratio $O(1)$.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
