-
MIDAS-QR with 2-Dimensional Structure
Authors:
Tibor Szendrei,
Arnab Bhattacharjee,
Mark E. Schaffer
Abstract:
Mixed frequency data has been shown to improve the performance of growth-at-risk models in the literature. Most of the research has focused on imposing structure on the high-frequency lags when estimating MIDAS-QR models akin to what is done in mean models. However, only imposing structure on the lag-dimension can potentially induce quantile variation that would otherwise not be there. In this pap…
▽ More
Mixed frequency data has been shown to improve the performance of growth-at-risk models in the literature. Most of the research has focused on imposing structure on the high-frequency lags when estimating MIDAS-QR models akin to what is done in mean models. However, only imposing structure on the lag-dimension can potentially induce quantile variation that would otherwise not be there. In this paper we extend the framework by introducing structure on both the lag dimension and the quantile dimension. In this way we are able to shrink unnecessary quantile variation in the high-frequency variables. This leads to more gradual lag profiles in both dimensions compared to the MIDAS-QR and UMIDAS-QR. We show that this proposed method leads to further gains in nowcasting and forecasting on a pseudo-out-of-sample exercise on US data.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Non-stationary Financial Risk Factors and Macroeconomic Vulnerability for the UK
Authors:
Katalin Varga,
Tibor Szendrei
Abstract:
Tracking the build-up of financial vulnerabilities is a key component of financial stability policy. Due to the complexity of the financial system, this task is daunting, and there have been several proposals on how to manage this goal. One way to do this is by the creation of indices that act as a signal for the policy maker. While factor modelling in finance and economics has a rich history, mos…
▽ More
Tracking the build-up of financial vulnerabilities is a key component of financial stability policy. Due to the complexity of the financial system, this task is daunting, and there have been several proposals on how to manage this goal. One way to do this is by the creation of indices that act as a signal for the policy maker. While factor modelling in finance and economics has a rich history, most of the applications tend to focus on stationary factors. Nevertheless, financial stress (and in particular tail events) can exhibit a high degree of inertia. This paper advocates moving away from the stationary paradigm and instead proposes non-stationary factor models as measures of financial stress. Key advantage of a non-stationary factor model is that while some popular measures of financial stress describe the variance-covariance structure of the financial stress indicators, the new index can capture the tails of the distribution. To showcase this, we use the obtained factors as variables in a growth-at-risk exercise. This paper offers an overview of how to construct non-stationary dynamic factors of financial stress using the UK financial market as an example.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Fused LASSO as Non-Crossing Quantile Regression
Authors:
Tibor Szendrei,
Arnab Bhattacharjee,
Mark E. Schaffer
Abstract:
Quantile crossing has been an ever-present thorn in the side of quantile regression. This has spurred research into obtaining densities and coefficients that obey the quantile monotonicity property. While important contributions, these papers do not provide insight into how exactly these constraints influence the estimated coefficients. This paper extends non-crossing constraints and shows that by…
▽ More
Quantile crossing has been an ever-present thorn in the side of quantile regression. This has spurred research into obtaining densities and coefficients that obey the quantile monotonicity property. While important contributions, these papers do not provide insight into how exactly these constraints influence the estimated coefficients. This paper extends non-crossing constraints and shows that by varying a single hyperparameter ($α$) one can obtain commonly used quantile estimators. Namely, we obtain the quantile regression estimator of Koenker and Bassett (1978) when $α=0$, the non crossing quantile regression estimator of Bondell et al. (2010) when $α=1$, and the composite quantile regression estimator of Koenker (1984) and Zou and Yuan (2008) when $α\rightarrow\infty$. As such, we show that non-crossing constraints are simply a special type of fused-shrinkage.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Decoupling Shrinkage and Selection for the Bayesian Quantile Regression
Authors:
David Kohns,
Tibor Szendrei
Abstract:
This paper extends the idea of decoupling shrinkage and sparsity for continuous priors to Bayesian Quantile Regression (BQR). The procedure follows two steps: In the first step, we shrink the quantile regression posterior through state of the art continuous priors and in the second step, we sparsify the posterior through an efficient variant of the adaptive lasso, the signal adaptive variable sele…
▽ More
This paper extends the idea of decoupling shrinkage and sparsity for continuous priors to Bayesian Quantile Regression (BQR). The procedure follows two steps: In the first step, we shrink the quantile regression posterior through state of the art continuous priors and in the second step, we sparsify the posterior through an efficient variant of the adaptive lasso, the signal adaptive variable selection (SAVS) algorithm. We propose a new variant of the SAVS which automates the choice of penalisation through quantile specific loss-functions that are valid in high dimensions. We show in large scale simulations that our selection procedure decreases bias irrespective of the true underlying degree of sparsity in the data, compared to the un-sparsified regression posterior. We apply our two-step approach to a high dimensional growth-at-risk (GaR) exercise. The prediction accuracy of the un-sparsified posterior is retained while yielding interpretable quantile specific variable selection results. Our procedure can be used to communicate to policymakers which variables drive downside risk to the macro economy.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Horseshoe Prior Bayesian Quantile Regression
Authors:
David Kohns,
Tibor Szendrei
Abstract:
This paper extends the horseshoe prior of Carvalho et al. (2010) to Bayesian quantile regression (HS-BQR) and provides a fast sampling algorithm for computation in high dimensions. The performance of the proposed HS-BQR is evaluated on Monte Carlo simulations and a high dimensional Growth-at-Risk (GaR) forecasting application for the U.S. The Monte Carlo design considers several sparsity and error…
▽ More
This paper extends the horseshoe prior of Carvalho et al. (2010) to Bayesian quantile regression (HS-BQR) and provides a fast sampling algorithm for computation in high dimensions. The performance of the proposed HS-BQR is evaluated on Monte Carlo simulations and a high dimensional Growth-at-Risk (GaR) forecasting application for the U.S. The Monte Carlo design considers several sparsity and error structures. Compared to alternative shrinkage priors, the proposed HS-BQR yields better (or at worst similar) performance in coefficient bias and forecast error. The HS-BQR is particularly potent in sparse designs and in estimating extreme quantiles. As expected, the simulations also highlight that identifying quantile specific location and scale effects for individual regressors in dense DGPs requires substantial data. In the GaR application, we forecast tail risks as well as complete forecast densities using the McCracken and Ng (2020) database. Quantile specific and density calibration score functions show that the HS-BQR provides the best performance, especially at short and medium run horizons. The ability to produce well calibrated density forecasts and accurate downside risk measures in large data contexts makes the HS-BQR a promising tool for nowcasting applications and recession modelling.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 13 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
