-
What can ecosystems learn? Expanding evolutionary ecology with learning theory
Authors:
Daniel A. Power,
Richard A. Watson,
Eörs Szathmáry,
Rob Mills,
Simon T Powers,
C Patrick Doncaster,
Błażej Czapp
Abstract:
Understanding how the structure of community interactions is modified by coevolution is vital for understanding system responses to change at all scales. However, in absence of a group selection process, collective community behaviours cannot be organised or adapted in a Darwinian sense. An open question thus persists: are there alternative organising principles that enable us to understand how co…
▽ More
Understanding how the structure of community interactions is modified by coevolution is vital for understanding system responses to change at all scales. However, in absence of a group selection process, collective community behaviours cannot be organised or adapted in a Darwinian sense. An open question thus persists: are there alternative organising principles that enable us to understand how coevolution of component species creates complex collective behaviours exhibited at the community level? We address this issue using principles from connectionist learning, a discipline with well-developed theories of emergent behaviours in simple networks. We identify conditions where selection on ecological interactions is equivalent to 'unsupervised learning' (a simple type of connectionist learning) and observe that this enables communities to self organize without community-level selection. Despite not being a Darwinian unit, ecological communities can behave like connectionist learning systems, creating internal organisation that habituates to past environmental conditions and actively recalling those conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
-
Coupled Hebbian learning and evolutionary dynamics in a formal model for structural synaptic plasticity
Authors:
Harold P. de Vladar,
Eörs Szathmáry
Abstract:
Theoretical models of neuronal function consider different mechanisms through which networks learn, classify and discern inputs. A central focus of these models is to understand how associations are established amongst neurons, in order to predict spiking patterns that are compatible with empirical observations. Although these models have led to major insights and advances, they still do not accou…
▽ More
Theoretical models of neuronal function consider different mechanisms through which networks learn, classify and discern inputs. A central focus of these models is to understand how associations are established amongst neurons, in order to predict spiking patterns that are compatible with empirical observations. Although these models have led to major insights and advances, they still do not account for the astonishing velocity with which the brain solves certain problems and what lies behind its creativity, amongst others features. We examine two important components that may crucially aid comprehensive understanding of said neurodynamical processes. First, we argue that once presented with a problem, different putative solutions are generated in parallel by different groups or local neuronal complexes, with the subsequent stabilization and spread of the best solutions. Using mathematical models we show that this mechanism accelerates finding the right solutions. This formalism is analogous to standard replicator-mutator models of evolution where mutation is analogous to the probability of neuron state switching (on/off). The second factor that we incorporate is structural synaptic plasticity, i.e. the making of new and disbanding of old synapses, which we apply as a dynamical reorganization of synaptic connections. We show that Hebbian learning alone does not suffice to reach optimal solutions. However, combining it with parallel evaluation and structural plasticity opens up possibilities for efficient problem solving. In the resulting networks, topologies converge to subsets of fully connected components. Imposing costs on synapses reduces the connectivity, although the number of connected components remains robust. The average lifetime of synapses is longer for connections that are established early, and diminishes with synaptic cost.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Phenotypic Plasticity, the Baldwin Effect, and the Speeding up of Evolution: the Computational Roots of an Illusion
Authors:
Mauro Santos,
Eörs Szathmáry,
José F. Fontanari
Abstract:
An increasing number of dissident voices claim that the standard neo-Darwinian view of genes as 'leaders' and phenotypes as 'followers' during the process of adaptive evolution should be turned on its head. This idea is older than the rediscovery of Mendel's laws of inheritance and has been given several names before its final 'Baldwin effect' label. A condition for this effect is that environment…
▽ More
An increasing number of dissident voices claim that the standard neo-Darwinian view of genes as 'leaders' and phenotypes as 'followers' during the process of adaptive evolution should be turned on its head. This idea is older than the rediscovery of Mendel's laws of inheritance and has been given several names before its final 'Baldwin effect' label. A condition for this effect is that environmentally induced variation such as phenotypic plasticity or learning is crucial for the initial establishment of a population. This gives the necessary time for natural selection to act on genetic variation and the adaptive trait can be eventually encoded in the genotype. An influential paper published in the late 1980s showed the Baldwin effect to happen in computer simulations, and claimed that it was crucial to solve a difficult adaptive task. This generated much excitement among scholars in various disciplines that regard neo-Darwinian accounts to explain the evolutionary emergence of high-order phenotypic traits such as consciousness or language almost hopeless. Here, we use analytical and computational approaches to show that a standard population genetics treatment can easily crack what the scientific community has granted as an unsolvable adaptive problem without learning. The Baldwin effect is once again in need of convincing theoretical foundations.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
The monetary growth order
Authors:
Günter von Kiedrowski,
Eörs Szathmáry
Abstract:
Growth of monetary assets and debts is commonly described by the formula of compound interest which for the case of continuous compounding is the exponential growth law. Its differential form is dc/dt = i c where dc/dt describes the rate of monetary growth, i the compounded interest rate and c the actual principal. Exponential growth of this type is fixed to be neither resource-limited nor self-li…
▽ More
Growth of monetary assets and debts is commonly described by the formula of compound interest which for the case of continuous compounding is the exponential growth law. Its differential form is dc/dt = i c where dc/dt describes the rate of monetary growth, i the compounded interest rate and c the actual principal. Exponential growth of this type is fixed to be neither resource-limited nor self-limiting which is in contrast to real economic growth (such as the GDP) which may have exponential, but also subexponential, linear, saturation, and even decline phases. As a result assets and debts commonly outgrow their economic fundament giving rise to the financial equivalent of Malthusian catastrophes after a certain interval of time. We here introduce an alternative for exponential compounding and propose to replace dc/dt = i c by dc/dt = i c^p where the exponent p (called reaction order in chemistry) is a quantity which will be termed monetary growth order. The monetary growth order p is seen as a tuning handle which enables to adjust gross monetary growth to real economic growth. It is suggested that the central banks take a serious look to this control instrument which allows tuning in crisis situations and immediate return to the exponential norm if needed.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
Comparable system-level organization of Archaea and Eukaryotes
Authors:
J. Podani,
Z. N. Oltvai,
H. Jeong,
B. Tombor,
A. -L. Barabasi,
E. Szathmary
Abstract:
A central and long-standing issue in evolutionary theory is the origin of the biological variation upon which natural selection acts1. Some hypotheses suggest that evolutionary change represents an adaptation to the surrounding environment within the constraints of an organism's innate characteristics. Elucidation of the origin and evolutionary relationship of species has been complemented by nu…
▽ More
A central and long-standing issue in evolutionary theory is the origin of the biological variation upon which natural selection acts1. Some hypotheses suggest that evolutionary change represents an adaptation to the surrounding environment within the constraints of an organism's innate characteristics. Elucidation of the origin and evolutionary relationship of species has been complemented by nucleotide sequence and gene content analyses, with profound implications for recognizing life's major domains. Understanding of evolutionary relationships may be further expanded by comparing systemic higher-level organization among species. Here we employ multivariate analyses to evaluate the biochemical reaction pathways characterizing 43 species. Comparison of the information transfer pathways of Archaea and Eukaryotes indicates a close relationship between these domains. In addition, whereas eukaryotic metabolic enzymes are primarily of bacterial origin, the pathway-level organization of archaeal and eukaryotic metabolic networks is more closely related. Our analyses therefore suggest that during the symbiotic evolution of eukaryotes, incorporation of bacterial metabolic enzymes into the proto-archaeal proteome was constrained by the host's pre-existing metabolic architecture.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2001;
originally announced October 2001.
