-
Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements
Authors:
Gabor Facsko,
David Sibeck,
Ilja Honkonen,
Jozsef Bor,
German Farinas Perez,
Aniko Timar,
Yuri Shprits,
Pyry Peitso,
Laura Degener,
Eija Tanskanen,
Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu,
Sandor Szalai,
Arpad Kis,
Viktor Wesztergom,
Akos Madar,
Nikolett Biro,
Gergely Koban,
Andras Illyes,
Peter Kovacs,
Zsuzsanna Dalya,
Munkhjargal Lkhagvadorj
Abstract:
We compare the predictions of the GUMICS$-$4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field ($B_{z}$) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the veloci…
▽ More
We compare the predictions of the GUMICS$-$4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field ($B_{z}$) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line ($V_{x}$), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS$-$4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the $B_{y}$ component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Long term measurements from the Mátra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory
Authors:
P. Ván,
G. G. Barnaföldi,
T. Bulik,
T. Biró,
S. Czellár,
M. Cieślar,
Cs. Czanik,
E. Dávid,
E. Debreceni,
M. Denys,
M. Dobróka,
E. Fenyvesi,
D. Gondek-Rosińska,
Z. Gráczer,
G. Hamar,
G. Huba,
B. Kacskovics,
Á. Kis,
I. Kovács,
R. Kovács,
I. Lemperger,
P. Lévai,
S. Lökös,
J. Mlynarczyk,
J. Molnár
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Summary of the long term data taking, related to one of the proposed next generation ground-based gravitational detector's location is presented here. Results of seismic and infrasound noise, electromagnetic attenuation and cosmic muon radiation measurements are reported in the underground Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory near Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary. The collected seismic data of mo…
▽ More
Summary of the long term data taking, related to one of the proposed next generation ground-based gravitational detector's location is presented here. Results of seismic and infrasound noise, electromagnetic attenuation and cosmic muon radiation measurements are reported in the underground Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory near Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary. The collected seismic data of more than two years is evaluated from the point of view of the Einstein Telescope, a proposed third generation underground gravitational wave observatory. Applying our results for the site selection will significantly improve the signal to nose ratio of the multi-messenger astrophysics era, especially at the low frequency regime.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
First report of long term measurements of the {MGGL} laboratory in the {M}átra mountain range
Authors:
G. G. Barnaföldi,
T. Bulik,
M. Cieslar,
E. Dávid,
M. Dobróka,
E. Fenyvesi,
D. Gondek-Rosinska,
Z. Gráczer,
G. Hamar,
G. Huba,
Á. Kis,
R. Kovács,
I. Lemperger,
P. Lévai,
J. Molnár,
D. Nagy,
A. Novák,
L. Oláh,
P. Pázmándi,
D. Piri,
L. Somlai,
T. Starecki,
M. Suchenek,
G. Surányi,
S. Szalai
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory (MGGL) has been established near Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary in 2015, in the cavern system of an unused ore mine. The Laboratory is located at 88~m below the surface, with the aim to measure and analyse the advantages of the underground installation of third generation gravitational wave detectors. Specialized instruments have been installed to measure se…
▽ More
Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory (MGGL) has been established near Gyöngyösoroszi, Hungary in 2015, in the cavern system of an unused ore mine. The Laboratory is located at 88~m below the surface, with the aim to measure and analyse the advantages of the underground installation of third generation gravitational wave detectors. Specialized instruments have been installed to measure seismic, infrasound, electromagnetic noise, and the variation of the cosmic muon flux. In the preliminary (RUN-0) test period, March-August 2016, data collection has been accomplished. In this paper we describe the research potential of the MGGL, list the installed equipments and summarize the experimental results of RUN-0. Here we report RUN-0 data, that prepares systematic and synchronized data collection of the next run period.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2017; v1 submitted 24 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
