Using Virtual Reality to Simulate Human-Robot Emergency Evacuation Scenarios
Authors:
Alan R. Wagner,
Colin Holbrook,
Daniel Holman,
Brett Sheeran,
Vidullan Surendran,
Jared Armagost,
Savanna Spazak,
Yinxuan Yin
Abstract:
This paper describes our recent effort to use virtual reality to simulate threatening emergency evacuation scenarios in which a robot guides a person to an exit. Our prior work has demonstrated that people will follow a robot's guidance, even when the robot is faulty, during an emergency evacuation. Yet, because physical in-person emergency evacuation experiments are difficult and costly to conduc…
▽ More
This paper describes our recent effort to use virtual reality to simulate threatening emergency evacuation scenarios in which a robot guides a person to an exit. Our prior work has demonstrated that people will follow a robot's guidance, even when the robot is faulty, during an emergency evacuation. Yet, because physical in-person emergency evacuation experiments are difficult and costly to conduct and because we would like to evaluate many different factors, we are motivated to develop a system that immerses people in the simulation environment to encourage genuine subject reactions. We are working to complete experiments verifying the validity of our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
Toward Ethical Robotic Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction Scenarios
Authors:
Shengkang Chen,
Vidullan Surendran,
Alan R. Wagner,
Jason Borenstein,
Ronald C. Arkin
Abstract:
This paper describes current progress on develo** an ethical architecture for robots that are designed to follow human ethical decision-making processes. We surveyed both regular adults (folks) and ethics experts (experts) on what they consider to be ethical behavior in two specific scenarios: pill-sorting with an older adult and game playing with a child. A key goal of the surveys is to better…
▽ More
This paper describes current progress on develo** an ethical architecture for robots that are designed to follow human ethical decision-making processes. We surveyed both regular adults (folks) and ethics experts (experts) on what they consider to be ethical behavior in two specific scenarios: pill-sorting with an older adult and game playing with a child. A key goal of the surveys is to better understand human ethical decision-making. In the first survey, folk responses were based on the subject's ethical choices ("folk morality"); in the second survey, expert responses were based on the expert's application of different formal ethical frameworks to each scenario. We observed that most of the formal ethical frameworks we included in the survey (Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Ethics of Care and Virtue Ethics) and "folk morality" were conservative toward deception in the high-risk task with an older adult when both the adult and the child had significant performance deficiencies.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
