-
The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Authors:
Jonathan P. Gardner,
John C. Mather,
Randy Abbott,
James S. Abell,
Mark Abernathy,
Faith E. Abney,
John G. Abraham,
Roberto Abraham,
Yasin M. Abul-Huda,
Scott Acton,
Cynthia K. Adams,
Evan Adams,
David S. Adler,
Maarten Adriaensen,
Jonathan Albert Aguilar,
Mansoor Ahmed,
Nasif S. Ahmed,
Tanjira Ahmed,
Rüdeger Albat,
Loïc Albert,
Stacey Alberts,
David Aldridge,
Mary Marsha Allen,
Shaune S. Allen,
Martin Altenburg
, et al. (983 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono…
▽ More
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Radio observations of comet 9P/Tempel 1 before and after Deep Impact
Authors:
N. Biver,
D. Bockelée-Morvan,
J. Boissier,
J. Crovisier,
P. Colom,
A. Lecacheux,
R. Moreno,
G. Paubert,
D. Lis,
M. Sumner,
U. Frisk,
A. Hjalmarson,
M. Olberg,
A. Winnberg,
H. -G. Florén,
Aa. Sandqvist,
Sun Kwok
Abstract:
Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was the target of a multi-wavelength worldwide investigation in 2005. The NASA Deep Impact mission reached the comet on 4.24 July 2005, delivering a 370 kg impactor which hit the comet at 10.3 km/s. Following this impact, a cloud of gas and dust was excavated from the comet nucleus. The comet was observed in 2005 prior to and after the impact, at 18-cm wavelength with the Nança…
▽ More
Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was the target of a multi-wavelength worldwide investigation in 2005. The NASA Deep Impact mission reached the comet on 4.24 July 2005, delivering a 370 kg impactor which hit the comet at 10.3 km/s. Following this impact, a cloud of gas and dust was excavated from the comet nucleus. The comet was observed in 2005 prior to and after the impact, at 18-cm wavelength with the Nançay radio telescope, in the millimetre range with the IRAM and CSO radio telescopes, and at 557 GHz with the Odin satellite.
Post-impact observations at IRAM and CSO did not reveal a significant change of the outgassing rates and relative abundances, with the exception of CH_3OH which may have been more abundant by up to one order of magnitude in the ejecta. Most other variations are linked to the intrinsic variability of the comet. The Odin satellite monitored nearly continuously the H_2O line at 557 GHz during the 38 hours following the impact on the 4th of July, in addition to weekly monitoring. Once the periodic variations related to the nucleus rotation are removed, a small increase of outgassing related to the impact is present, which corresponds to the release of \approx 5000+/-2000 tons of water. Two other bursts of activity, also observed at other wavelengths, were seen on 23 June and 7 July; they correspond to even larger releases of gas.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2006;
originally announced October 2006.
-
The Polarizing Power of the Interstellar Medium in Taurus
Authors:
Hector G. Arce,
Alyssa A. Goodman,
Pierre Bastien,
Nadine Manset,
Mathew Sumner
Abstract:
We present a study of the polarizing power of the dust in cold dense regions (dark clouds) compared to that of dust in the general interstellar medium (ISM). Our study uses new polarimetric, optical, and spectral classification data for 36 stars to carefully study the relation between polarization percentage (p) and extinction (A_V) in the Taurus dark cloud complex. We find two trends in our p-A…
▽ More
We present a study of the polarizing power of the dust in cold dense regions (dark clouds) compared to that of dust in the general interstellar medium (ISM). Our study uses new polarimetric, optical, and spectral classification data for 36 stars to carefully study the relation between polarization percentage (p) and extinction (A_V) in the Taurus dark cloud complex. We find two trends in our p-A_V study: (1) stars background to the warm ISM show an increase in p with A_V; and (2) the percentage of polarization of stars background to cold dark clouds does not increase with extinction. We detect a break in the p-A_V relation at an extinction 1.3 +/- 0.2 mag, which we expect corresponds to a set of conditions where the polarizing power of the dust associated with the Taurus dark clouds drops precipitously. This breakpoint places important restrictions on the use of polarimetry in studying interstellar magnetic fields.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 1998;
originally announced March 1998.
-
Gamma-Ray Burst and Relativistic Shells: The Surface Filling Factor
Authors:
E. E. Fenimore,
C. Cooper,
E. Ramirez-Ruiz,
M. C. Sumner,
A. Yoshida,
M. Namiki
Abstract:
The variability observed in many complex gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is inconsistent with causally connected variations in a single, symmetric, relativistic shell interacting with the ambient material ("external shocks"). Rather, the symmetry of the shell must be broken on an angular scale much smaller than Gamma^{-1} where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor for the shell. The observed variability in…
▽ More
The variability observed in many complex gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is inconsistent with causally connected variations in a single, symmetric, relativistic shell interacting with the ambient material ("external shocks"). Rather, the symmetry of the shell must be broken on an angular scale much smaller than Gamma^{-1} where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor for the shell. The observed variability in the external shock models arises from the number of causally connected regions that (randomly) become active. We define the "surface filling factor" to be the ratio of the area of causally connected regions that become active to the observable area of the shell. From the observed variability in 52 BATSE bursts, we estimate the surface filling factor to be typically 0.005 although some values are near unity. We find that the surface filling factor is about 0.1 Delta T/T in both the constant Gamma phase (which probably produces the GRB) and the deaccelerating phase (which probably produces the x-ray afterglows). Here, ΔT is a typical time scale of variability and T is the time since the initial signal. We analyze the 2 hr flare seen by ASCA 36 hr after the GRB and conclude that the surface filling factor must be small (0.001) in the x-ray afterglow phase as well. Explanations for low surface filling factor can either require more or less energy (by a factor of about 1000) compared to that expected for a symmetric shell.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 1998; v1 submitted 13 February, 1998;
originally announced February 1998.
-
Kinematic Arguments Against Single Relativistic Shell Models for Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
E. E. Fenimore,
E. Ramirez,
M. C. Sumner
Abstract:
Two main types of models have been suggested to explain the long durations and multiple peaks of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). In one, there is a very quick release of energy at a central site resulting in a single relativistic shell that produces peaks in the time history through its interactions with the ambient material. In the other, the central site sporadically releases energy over hundreds of…
▽ More
Two main types of models have been suggested to explain the long durations and multiple peaks of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). In one, there is a very quick release of energy at a central site resulting in a single relativistic shell that produces peaks in the time history through its interactions with the ambient material. In the other, the central site sporadically releases energy over hundreds of seconds forming a peak with each burst of energy. We present three kinematic arguments against a single relativistic shell. These arguments are based only on symmetry. We show that the average envelope of emission of GRBs is a linear function rather than the power law expected for a single relativistic shell. We show that presence of gaps in GRBs is the strongest argument against a single relativistic shell. We estimate that the fraction of a single shell that can produce gamma-rays in a GRB with multiple peaks is about 0.001, implying that single relativistic shells require 1000 times more energy than previously thought. We conclude that either the central site of a GRB must produce 10^{51} erg/s for hundreds of seconds, or the relativistic shell must have structure on a scales the order of sqrt(epsilon)/Gamma, where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor and epsilon is the efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 1997;
originally announced December 1997.
-
Variability in Shell Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
M. C. Sumner,
E. E. Fenimore
Abstract:
Many cosmological models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) assume that a single relativistic shell carries kinetic energy away from the source and later converts it into gamma rays, perhaps by interactions with the interstellar medium or by shocks within the shell. We investigate methods of achieving the observed variability using symmetry. Since our model emphasizes geometric and statistical considera…
▽ More
Many cosmological models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) assume that a single relativistic shell carries kinetic energy away from the source and later converts it into gamma rays, perhaps by interactions with the interstellar medium or by shocks within the shell. We investigate methods of achieving the observed variability using symmetry. Since our model emphasizes geometric and statistical considerations, rather than the detailed physics of the shell, it is applicable to any theory that relies on relativistic shells. In order to achieve the observed variability in GRBs using a single-shell model, we have found that the gamma-ray emission must occur from small patches on the shell (entities). We have derived two significant characteristics of the time histories expected from such a model. First, the average number of entities contributing to the signal remains constant throughout much of the time history, although the overall photon flux decreases due to relativistic effects. Second, the "peaks" in a time history can be ascribed to Poisson variations in the actual number of entities contributing to the signal at any given time. Taken together, these properties imply that the relative variations in a GRB (i.e. the heights of the peaks relative to the average envelope of the signal) should remain constant throughout a time history.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 1997;
originally announced December 1997.
-
Relativistic Shells and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
E. E. Fenimore,
M. C. Sumner
Abstract:
In many models of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) relativistic shells are responsible for the overall envelope of emission. We use kinematics and symmetry to calculate the time history and spectral evolution expected from a relativistic shell including effects from intrinsic variations in the shell's intensity and spectra. We find that the decay phase of an envelope is produced by photons delayed by the…
▽ More
In many models of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) relativistic shells are responsible for the overall envelope of emission. We use kinematics and symmetry to calculate the time history and spectral evolution expected from a relativistic shell including effects from intrinsic variations in the shell's intensity and spectra. We find that the decay phase of an envelope is produced by photons delayed by the shell's curvature. These delayed photons are produced by regions that are off-axis such that the spectra evolve according to a universal function (T^{-1}) regardless of intrinsic variations in the rest frame of the shell. We compare our predictions to the overall envelope of emission of GRBs. The observed spectra evolve faster. Intrinsic variations cannot make the spectra evolve that fast, which adds strength to the ``shell symmetry'' problem: models, in particular, the external shock model, that involve relativistic shells must either confine the material to narrow pencil beams, be very inefficient, or break the local spherical symmetry so that the shell acts like a parallel slab. In the case of the internal shock models involving winds (i.e., central engines), it will probably be easier to break the local spherical symmetry, but then one must postulate nearly continuous energy generation at 10^{51} erg s^{-1} lasting up to hundreds of seconds at the central site.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 1997;
originally announced May 1997.
