Moving Towards Automated Interstellar Boundary Explorer Data Selection with LOTUS
Authors:
Madeline A. Stricklin,
Lauren J. Beesley,
Brian P. Weaver,
Kelly R. Moran,
Dave Osthus,
Paul H. Janzen,
Grant David Meadors,
Daniel B. Reisenfeld
Abstract:
The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite collects data on energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) that provide insight into the heliosphere, the region surrounding our solar system and separating it from interstellar space. IBEX collects information on these particles and on extraneous ``background'' particles. While IBEX records how and when the different particles are observed, it does not dis…
▽ More
The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite collects data on energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) that provide insight into the heliosphere, the region surrounding our solar system and separating it from interstellar space. IBEX collects information on these particles and on extraneous ``background'' particles. While IBEX records how and when the different particles are observed, it does not distinguish between heliospheric ENA particles and incidental background particles. To address this issue, all IBEX data has historically been manually labeled as ``good'' ENA data, or ``bad'' background data. This manual culling process is incredibly time-intensive and contingent on subjective, manually-induced decision thresholds. In this paper, we develop a three-stage automated culling process, called LOTUS, that uses random forests to expedite and standardize the labelling process. In Stage 1, LOTUS uses random forests to obtain probabilities of observing true ENA particles on a per-observation basis. In Stage 2, LOTUS aggregates these probabilities to obtain predictions within small windows of time. In Stage 3, LOTUS refines these predictions. We compare the labels generated by LOTUS to those manually generated by the subject matter expert. We use various metrics to demonstrate that LOTUS is a useful automated process for supplementing and standardizing the manual culling process.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024; v1 submitted 13 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Empirical Validation of a New Data Product from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer Satellite
Authors:
Kelly R. Moran,
Dave Osthus,
Brian P. Weaver,
Lauren J. Beesley,
Madeline A. Stricklin,
Paul H. Janzen,
Daniel B. Reisenfeld
Abstract:
Since 2008, the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite has been gathering data on heliospheric energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) while being exposed to various sources of background noise, such as cosmic rays and solar energetic particles. The IBEX mission initially released only a qualified triple-coincidence (qABC) data product, which was designed to provide observations of ENAs free of ba…
▽ More
Since 2008, the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) satellite has been gathering data on heliospheric energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) while being exposed to various sources of background noise, such as cosmic rays and solar energetic particles. The IBEX mission initially released only a qualified triple-coincidence (qABC) data product, which was designed to provide observations of ENAs free of background contamination. Further measurements revealed that the qABC data was in fact susceptible to contamination, having relatively low ENA counts and high background rates. Recently, the mission team considered releasing a certain qualified double-coincidence (qBC) data product, which has roughly twice the detection rate of the qABC data product. This paper presents a simulation-based validation of the new qBC data product against the already-released qABC data product. The results show that the qBCs can plausibly be said to share the same signal rate as the qABCs up to an average absolute deviation of 3.6%. Visual diagnostics at an orbit, map, and full mission level provide additional confirmation of signal rate coherence across data products. These approaches are generalizable to other scenarios in which one wishes to test whether multiple observations could plausibly be generated by some underlying shared signal.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
