Hybrid quantum-classical reservoir computing for simulating chaotic systems
Authors:
Filip Wudarski,
Daniel O`Connor,
Shaun Geaney,
Ata Akbari Asanjan,
Max Wilson,
Elena Strbac,
P. Aaron Lott,
Davide Venturelli
Abstract:
Forecasting chaotic systems is a notably complex task, which in recent years has been approached with reasonable success using reservoir computing (RC), a recurrent network with fixed random weights (the reservoir) used to extract the spatio-temporal information of the system. This work presents a hybrid quantum reservoir-computing (HQRC) framework, which replaces the reservoir in RC with a quantu…
▽ More
Forecasting chaotic systems is a notably complex task, which in recent years has been approached with reasonable success using reservoir computing (RC), a recurrent network with fixed random weights (the reservoir) used to extract the spatio-temporal information of the system. This work presents a hybrid quantum reservoir-computing (HQRC) framework, which replaces the reservoir in RC with a quantum circuit. The modular structure and measurement feedback in the circuit are used to encode the complex system dynamics in the reservoir states, from which classical learning is performed to predict future dynamics. The noiseless simulations of HQRC demonstrate valid prediction times comparable to state-of-the-art classical RC models for both the Lorenz63 and double-scroll chaotic paradigmatic systems and adhere to the attractor dynamics long after the forecasts have deviated from the ground truth.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2024; v1 submitted 23 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Inter-generational comparison of quantum annealers in solving hard scheduling problems
Authors:
Bibek Pokharel,
Zoe Gonzalez Izquierdo,
P. Aaron Lott,
Elena Strbac,
Krzysztof Osiewalski,
Emmanuel Papathanasiou,
Alexei Kondratyev,
Davide Venturelli,
Eleanor Rieffel
Abstract:
We compare the performance of four quantum annealers, the D-Wave Two, 2X, 2000Q, and Advantage in solving an identical ensemble of a parametrized family of scheduling problems. These problems are NP-complete and, in fact, equivalent to vertex coloring problems. They are also practically motivated and closely connected to planning problems from artificial intelligence. We examine factors contributi…
▽ More
We compare the performance of four quantum annealers, the D-Wave Two, 2X, 2000Q, and Advantage in solving an identical ensemble of a parametrized family of scheduling problems. These problems are NP-complete and, in fact, equivalent to vertex coloring problems. They are also practically motivated and closely connected to planning problems from artificial intelligence. We examine factors contributing to the performance differences while separating the contributions from hardware upgrades, support for shorter anneal times, and possible optimization of ferromagnetic couplings. While shorter anneal times can improve the time to solution (TTS) at any given problem size, the scaling of TTS with respect to the problem size worsens for shorter anneal times. In contrast, optimizing the ferromagnetic coupling improves both the absolute TTS and the scaling. There is a statistically significant improvement in performance between D-Wave Two and 2X and from all older generation annealers to Advantage, even when operated under identical anneal time and ferromagnetic couplings. However, the performance improvement from 2X to 2000Q requires the anneal time and ferromagnetic couplings to be optimized. Overall, owing to these inter-generational hardware improvements and optimizations, the scaling exponent reduces from $1.01 \pm 0.01$ on Two to $0.173 \pm 0.009$ on Advantage.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
