A Tale of a Tail: A Tidally-Disrupting Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy in the M81 Group
Authors:
Rokas Žemaitis,
Annette M. N. Ferguson,
Sakurako Okamoto,
Jean-Charles Cuillandre,
Connor J. Stone,
Nobuo Arimoto,
Mike J. Irwin
Abstract:
We present the discovery of a giant tidal tail of stars associated with F8D1, the closest known example of an ultra-diffuse galaxy (UDG). F8D1 sits in a region of the sky heavily contaminated by Galactic cirrus and has been poorly studied since its discovery two decades ago. The tidal feature was revealed in a deep map of resolved red giant branch stars constructed using data from our Subaru Hyper…
▽ More
We present the discovery of a giant tidal tail of stars associated with F8D1, the closest known example of an ultra-diffuse galaxy (UDG). F8D1 sits in a region of the sky heavily contaminated by Galactic cirrus and has been poorly studied since its discovery two decades ago. The tidal feature was revealed in a deep map of resolved red giant branch stars constructed using data from our Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey of the M81 Group. It has an average surface brightness of $μ_g \sim 32$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and can be traced for over a degree on the sky (60 kpc at the distance of F8D1) with our current imagery. We revisit the main body properties of F8D1 using deep multiband imagery acquired with MegaCam on CFHT and measure effective radii of $1.7-1.9$ kpc, central surface brightnesses of $24.7-25.7$ mag and a stellar mass of $\sim7 \times 10^7 M_{\odot}$. Assuming a symmetric feature on the other side of the galaxy, we calculate that $30-36$% of F8D1's present-day luminosity is contained in the tail. We argue that the most likely origin of F8D1's disruption is a recent close passage to M81, which would have stripped its gas and quenched its star formation. As the only UDG that has so far been studied to such faint surface brightness depths, the unveiling of F8D1's tidal disruption is important. It leaves open the possibility that many other UDGs could be the result of similar processes, with the most telling signatures of this lurking below current detection limits.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2022; v1 submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
Selected recollections of my relationship with Leo Breiman
Authors:
Charles J. Stone
Abstract:
During the period 1962--1964, I had a tenure track Assistant Professorship in Mathematics at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where I did research in probability theory, especially on linear diffusion processes. Being somewhat lonely there and not liking the cold winter weather, I decided around the beginning of 1964 to try to get a job in the Mathematics Department at UCLA, in the city in…
▽ More
During the period 1962--1964, I had a tenure track Assistant Professorship in Mathematics at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where I did research in probability theory, especially on linear diffusion processes. Being somewhat lonely there and not liking the cold winter weather, I decided around the beginning of 1964 to try to get a job in the Mathematics Department at UCLA, in the city in which I was born and raised. At that time, Leo Breiman was an Associate Professor in that department. Presumably, he liked my research on linear diffusion processes and other research as well, since the department offered me a tenure track Assistant Professorship, which I happily accepted. During the Summer of 1965, I worked on various projects with Sidney Port, then at RAND Corporation, especially on random walks and related material. I was promoted to Associate Professor, effective in Fall, 1966, presumably thanks in part to Leo. Early in 1966, I~was surprised to be asked by Leo to participate in a department meeting called to discuss the possible hiring of Sidney. The conclusion was that Sidney was hired as Associate Professor in the department, as of Fall, 1966. Leo communicated to me his view that he thought that Sidney and I worked well together, which is why he had urged the department to hire Sidney. Anyhow, Sidney and I had a very fruitful and enjoyable collaboration in probability and, to a much lesser extent, in theoretical statistics, for a number of years thereafter.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2011;
originally announced January 2011.
