The External Calibrator for Hydrogen Observatories
Authors:
Daniel C. Jacobs,
Jacob Burba,
Judd Bowman,
Abraham R. Neben,
Benjamin Stinnett,
Lauren Turner
Abstract:
Multiple instruments are pursuing constraints on dark energy, observing reionization and opening a window on the dark ages through the detection and characterization of the 21cm hydrogen line across the redshift spectrum, from nearby to z=25. These instruments, including CHIME in the sub-meter and HERA in the meter bands, are wide-field arrays with multiple-degree beams, typically operating in tra…
▽ More
Multiple instruments are pursuing constraints on dark energy, observing reionization and opening a window on the dark ages through the detection and characterization of the 21cm hydrogen line across the redshift spectrum, from nearby to z=25. These instruments, including CHIME in the sub-meter and HERA in the meter bands, are wide-field arrays with multiple-degree beams, typically operating in transit mode. Accurate knowledge of their primary beams is critical for separation of bright foregrounds from the desired cosmological signals, but difficult to achieve through astronomical observations alone. Previous beam calibration work has focused on model verification and does not address the need of 21cm experiments for routine beam map**, to the horizon, of the as-built array. We describe the design and methodology of a drone-mounted calibrator, the External Calibrator for Hydrogen Observatories (ECHO), that aims to address this need. We report on a first set of trials to calibrate low-frequency dipoles and compare ECHO measurements to an established beam-map** system based on transmissions from the Orbcomm satellite constellation. We create beam maps of two dipoles at a 9-degree resolution and find sample noise ranging from 1 to 2%. Assuming this sample noise represents the error in the measurement, the higher end of this range is roughly twice the desired requirement. The overall performance of ECHO suggests that the desired precision and angular coverage is achievable in practice with modest improvements. We identify the main sources of systematic error and uncertainty in our measurements and describe the steps needed to overcome them.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
