Monitoring Collective Communication Among GPUs
Authors:
Muhammet Abdullah Soyturk,
Palwisha Akhtar,
Erhan Tezcan,
Didem Unat
Abstract:
Communication among devices in multi-GPU systems plays an important role in terms of performance and scalability. In order to optimize an application, programmers need to know the type and amount of the communication happening among GPUs. Although there are prior works to gather this information in MPI applications on distributed systems and multi-threaded applications on shared memory systems, th…
▽ More
Communication among devices in multi-GPU systems plays an important role in terms of performance and scalability. In order to optimize an application, programmers need to know the type and amount of the communication happening among GPUs. Although there are prior works to gather this information in MPI applications on distributed systems and multi-threaded applications on shared memory systems, there is no tool that identifies communication among GPUs. Our prior work, ComScribe, presents a point-to-point (P2P) communication detection tool for GPUs sharing a common host. In this work, we extend ComScribe to identify communication among GPUs for collective and P2P communication primitives in NVIDIA's NCCL library. In addition to P2P communications, collective communications are commonly used in HPC and AI workloads thus it is important to monitor the induced data movement due to collectives. Our tool extracts the size and the frequency of data transfers in an application and visualizes them as a communication matrix. To demonstrate the tool in action, we present communication matrices and some statistics for two applications coming from machine translation and image classification domains.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
Hardware Versus Software Fault Injection of Modern Undervolted SRAMs
Authors:
Muhammet Abdullah Soyturk,
Konstantinos Parasyris,
Behzad Salami,
Osman Unsal,
Gulay Yalcin,
Leonardo Bautista Gomez
Abstract:
To improve power efficiency, researchers are experimenting with dynamically adjusting the supply voltage of systems below the nominal operating points. However, production systems are typically not allowed to function on voltage settings that is below the reliable limit. Consequently, existing software fault tolerance studies are based on fault models, which inject faults on random fault locations…
▽ More
To improve power efficiency, researchers are experimenting with dynamically adjusting the supply voltage of systems below the nominal operating points. However, production systems are typically not allowed to function on voltage settings that is below the reliable limit. Consequently, existing software fault tolerance studies are based on fault models, which inject faults on random fault locations using fault injection techniques. In this work we study whether random fault injection is accurate to simulate the behavior of undervolted SRAMs.
Our study extends the Gem5 simulator to support fault injection on the caches of the simulated system. The fault injection framework uses fault maps, which describe the faulty bits of SRAMs, as inputs. To compare random fault injection and hardware guided fault injection, we use two types of fault maps. The first type of maps are created through undervolting real SRAMs and observing the location of the erroneous bits, whereas the second type of maps are created by corrupting random bits of the SRAMs. During our study we corrupt the L1-Dcache of the simulated system and we monitor the behavior of the two types of fault maps on the resiliency of six benchmarks. The difference among the resiliency of a benchmark when tested with the different fault maps can be up to 24%.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
