Generative Large Language Models are autonomous practitioners of evidence-based medicine
Authors:
Akhil Vaid,
Joshua Lampert,
Juhee Lee,
Ashwin Sawant,
Donald Apakama,
Ankit Sakhuja,
Ali Soroush,
Denise Lee,
Isotta Landi,
Nicole Bussola,
Ismail Nabeel,
Robbie Freeman,
Patricia Kovatch,
Brendan Carr,
Benjamin Glicksberg,
Edgar Argulian,
Stamatios Lerakis,
Monica Kraft,
Alexander Charney,
Girish Nadkarni
Abstract:
Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is fundamental to modern clinical practice, requiring clinicians to continually update their knowledge and apply the best clinical evidence in patient care. The practice of EBM faces challenges due to rapid advancements in medical research, leading to information overload for clinicians. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically Generat…
▽ More
Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is fundamental to modern clinical practice, requiring clinicians to continually update their knowledge and apply the best clinical evidence in patient care. The practice of EBM faces challenges due to rapid advancements in medical research, leading to information overload for clinicians. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically Generative Large Language Models (LLMs), offers a promising solution towards managing this complexity.
Methods: This study involved the curation of real-world clinical cases across various specialties, converting them into .json files for analysis. LLMs, including proprietary models like ChatGPT 3.5 and 4, Gemini Pro, and open-source models like LLaMA v2 and Mixtral-8x7B, were employed. These models were equipped with tools to retrieve information from case files and make clinical decisions similar to how clinicians must operate in the real world. Model performance was evaluated based on correctness of final answer, judicious use of tools, conformity to guidelines, and resistance to hallucinations.
Results: GPT-4 was most capable of autonomous operation in a clinical setting, being generally more effective in ordering relevant investigations and conforming to clinical guidelines. Limitations were observed in terms of model ability to handle complex guidelines and diagnostic nuances. Retrieval Augmented Generation made recommendations more tailored to patients and healthcare systems.
Conclusions: LLMs can be made to function as autonomous practitioners of evidence-based medicine. Their ability to utilize tooling can be harnessed to interact with the infrastructure of a real-world healthcare system and perform the tasks of patient management in a guideline directed manner. Prompt engineering may help to further enhance this potential and transform healthcare for the clinician and the patient.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Large Language Models for Granularized Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis Classification
Authors:
Jenna Kefeli,
Ali Soroush,
Courtney J. Diamond,
Haley M. Zylberberg,
Benjamin May,
Julian A. Abrams,
Chunhua Weng,
Nicholas Tatonetti
Abstract:
Diagnostic codes for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to esophageal cancer, lack granularity and precision for many research or clinical use cases. Laborious manual chart review is required to extract key diagnostic phenotypes from BE pathology reports. We developed a generalizable transformer-based method to automate data extraction. Using pathology reports from Columbia University Irving Me…
▽ More
Diagnostic codes for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to esophageal cancer, lack granularity and precision for many research or clinical use cases. Laborious manual chart review is required to extract key diagnostic phenotypes from BE pathology reports. We developed a generalizable transformer-based method to automate data extraction. Using pathology reports from Columbia University Irving Medical Center with gastroenterologist-annotated targets, we performed binary dysplasia classification as well as granularized multi-class BE-related diagnosis classification. We utilized two clinically pre-trained large language models, with best model performance comparable to a highly tailored rule-based system developed using the same data. Binary dysplasia extraction achieves 0.964 F1-score, while the multi-class model achieves 0.911 F1-score. Our method is generalizable and faster to implement as compared to a tailored rule-based approach.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
