-
Common pitfalls to avoid while using multiobjective optimization in machine learning
Authors:
Junaid Akhter,
Paul David Fährmann,
Konstantin Sonntag,
Sebastian Peitz
Abstract:
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in exploring the application of multiobjective optimization (MOO) in machine learning (ML). The interest is driven by the numerous situations in real-life applications where multiple objectives need to be optimized simultaneously. A key aspect of MOO is the existence of a Pareto set, rather than a single optimal solution, which illustrates the inhere…
▽ More
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in exploring the application of multiobjective optimization (MOO) in machine learning (ML). The interest is driven by the numerous situations in real-life applications where multiple objectives need to be optimized simultaneously. A key aspect of MOO is the existence of a Pareto set, rather than a single optimal solution, which illustrates the inherent trade-offs between objectives. Despite its potential, there is a noticeable lack of satisfactory literature that could serve as an entry-level guide for ML practitioners who want to use MOO. Hence, our goal in this paper is to produce such a resource. We critically review previous studies, particularly those involving MOO in deep learning (using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as a guiding example), and identify misconceptions that highlight the need for a better grasp of MOO principles in ML. Using MOO of PINNs as a case study, we demonstrate the interplay between the data loss and the physics loss terms. We highlight the most common pitfalls one should avoid while using MOO techniques in ML. We begin by establishing the groundwork for MOO, focusing on well-known approaches such as the weighted sum (WS) method, alongside more complex techniques like the multiobjective gradient descent algorithm (MGDA). Additionally, we compare the results obtained from the WS and MGDA with one of the most common evolutionary algorithms, NSGA-II. We emphasize the importance of understanding the specific problem, the objective space, and the selected MOO method, while also noting that neglecting factors such as convergence can result in inaccurate outcomes and, consequently, a non-optimal solution. Our goal is to offer a clear and practical guide for ML practitioners to effectively apply MOO, particularly in the context of DL.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
A Descent Method for Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization in Hilbert Spaces
Authors:
Konstantin Sonntag,
Bennet Gebken,
Georg Müller,
Sebastian Peitz,
Stefan Volkwein
Abstract:
The efficient optimization method for locally Lipschitz continuous multiobjective optimization problems from [1] is extended from finite-dimensional problems to general Hilbert spaces. The method iteratively computes Pareto critical points, where in each iteration, an approximation of the subdifferential is computed in an efficient manner and then used to compute a common descent direction for all…
▽ More
The efficient optimization method for locally Lipschitz continuous multiobjective optimization problems from [1] is extended from finite-dimensional problems to general Hilbert spaces. The method iteratively computes Pareto critical points, where in each iteration, an approximation of the subdifferential is computed in an efficient manner and then used to compute a common descent direction for all objective functions. To prove convergence, we present some new optimality results for nonsmooth multiobjective optimization problems in Hilbert spaces. Using these, we can show that every accumulation point of the sequence generated by our algorithm is Pareto critical under common assumptions. Computational efficiency for finding Pareto critical points is numerically demonstrated for multiobjective optimal control of an obstacle problem.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A multiobjective continuation method to compute the regularization path of deep neural networks
Authors:
Augustina C. Amakor,
Konstantin Sonntag,
Sebastian Peitz
Abstract:
Sparsity is a highly desired feature in deep neural networks (DNNs) since it ensures numerical efficiency, improves the interpretability of models (due to the smaller number of relevant features), and robustness. For linear models, it is well known that there exists a \emph{regularization path} connecting the sparsest solution in terms of the $\ell^1$ norm, i.e., zero weights and the non-regulariz…
▽ More
Sparsity is a highly desired feature in deep neural networks (DNNs) since it ensures numerical efficiency, improves the interpretability of models (due to the smaller number of relevant features), and robustness. For linear models, it is well known that there exists a \emph{regularization path} connecting the sparsest solution in terms of the $\ell^1$ norm, i.e., zero weights and the non-regularized solution. Very recently, there was a first attempt to extend the concept of regularization paths to DNNs by means of treating the empirical loss and sparsity ($\ell^1$ norm) as two conflicting criteria and solving the resulting multiobjective optimization problem for low-dimensional DNN. However, due to the non-smoothness of the $\ell^1$ norm and the high number of parameters, this approach is not very efficient from a computational perspective for high-dimensional DNNs. To overcome this limitation, we present an algorithm that allows for the approximation of the entire Pareto front for the above-mentioned objectives in a very efficient manner for high-dimensional DNNs with millions of parameters. We present numerical examples using both deterministic and stochastic gradients. We furthermore demonstrate that knowledge of the regularization path allows for a well-generalizing network parametrization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm to compute the regularization path for non-convex multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) with millions of degrees of freedom.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2024; v1 submitted 23 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Multiobjective Optimization of Non-Smooth PDE-Constrained Problems
Authors:
Marco Bernreuther,
Michael Dellnitz,
Bennet Gebken,
Georg Müller,
Sebastian Peitz,
Konstantin Sonntag,
Stefan Volkwein
Abstract:
Multiobjective optimization plays an increasingly important role in modern applications, where several criteria are often of equal importance. The task in multiobjective optimization and multiobjective optimal control is therefore to compute the set of optimal compromises (the Pareto set) between the conflicting objectives. The advances in algorithms and the increasing interest in Pareto-optimal s…
▽ More
Multiobjective optimization plays an increasingly important role in modern applications, where several criteria are often of equal importance. The task in multiobjective optimization and multiobjective optimal control is therefore to compute the set of optimal compromises (the Pareto set) between the conflicting objectives. The advances in algorithms and the increasing interest in Pareto-optimal solutions have led to a wide range of new applications related to optimal and feedback control - potentially with non-smoothness both on the level of the objectives or in the system dynamics. This results in new challenges such as dealing with expensive models (e.g., governed by partial differential equations (PDEs)) and develo** dedicated algorithms handling the non-smoothness. Since in contrast to single-objective optimization, the Pareto set generally consists of an infinite number of solutions, the computational effort can quickly become challenging, which is particularly problematic when the objectives are costly to evaluate or when a solution has to be presented very quickly. This article gives an overview of recent developments in the field of multiobjective optimization of non-smooth PDE-constrained problems. In particular we report on the advances achieved within Project 2 "Multiobjective Optimization of Non-Smooth PDE-Constrained Problems - Switches, State Constraints and Model Order Reduction" of the DFG Priority Programm 1962 "Non-smooth and Complementarity-based Distributed Parameter Systems: Simulation and Hierarchical Optimization".
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Fast Convergence of Inertial Multiobjective Gradient-like Systems with Asymptotic Vanishing Dam**
Authors:
Konstantin Sonntag,
Sebastian Peitz
Abstract:
We present a new gradient-like dynamical system related to unconstrained convex smooth multiobjective optimization which involves inertial effects and asymptotic vanishing dam**. To the best of our knowledge, this system is the first inertial gradient-like system for multiobjective optimization problems including asymptotic vanishing dam**, expanding the ideas laid out in [H. Attouch and G. Ga…
▽ More
We present a new gradient-like dynamical system related to unconstrained convex smooth multiobjective optimization which involves inertial effects and asymptotic vanishing dam**. To the best of our knowledge, this system is the first inertial gradient-like system for multiobjective optimization problems including asymptotic vanishing dam**, expanding the ideas laid out in [H. Attouch and G. Garrigos, Multiobjective optimization: an inertial approach to Pareto optima, preprint, arXiv:1506.02823, 201]. We prove existence of solutions to this system in finite dimensions and further prove that its bounded solutions converge weakly to weakly Pareto optimal points. In addition, we obtain a convergence rate of order $O(t^{-2})$ for the function values measured with a merit function. This approach presents a good basis for the development of fast gradient methods for multiobjective optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2024; v1 submitted 3 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Fast Multiobjective Gradient Methods with Nesterov Acceleration via Inertial Gradient-like Systems
Authors:
Konstantin Sonntag,
Sebastian Peitz
Abstract:
We derive efficient algorithms to compute weakly Pareto optimal solutions for smooth, convex and unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems in general Hilbert spaces. To this end, we define a novel inertial gradient-like dynamical system in the multiobjective setting, whose trajectories converge weakly to Pareto optimal solutions. Discretization of this system yields an inertial multiobjec…
▽ More
We derive efficient algorithms to compute weakly Pareto optimal solutions for smooth, convex and unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems in general Hilbert spaces. To this end, we define a novel inertial gradient-like dynamical system in the multiobjective setting, whose trajectories converge weakly to Pareto optimal solutions. Discretization of this system yields an inertial multiobjective algorithm which generates sequences that converge weakly to Pareto optimal solutions. We employ Nesterov acceleration to define an algorithm with an improved convergence rate compared to the plain multiobjective steepest descent method (Algorithm 1).
A further improvement in terms of efficiency is achieved by avoiding the solution of a quadratic subproblem to compute a common step direction for all objective functions, which is usually required in first order methods. Using a different discretization of our inertial gradient-like dynamical system, we obtain an accelerated multiobjective gradient method that does not require the solution of a subproblem in each step (Algorithm 2). While this algorithm does not converge in general, it yields good results on test problems while being faster than standard steepest descent by two to three orders of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
