Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Smith, S G Z

Extending Grundy domination to $k$-Grundy domination

Authors: Rebekah Herrman, Stephen G. Z. Smith

Abstract: The Grundy domination number of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is the length of the longest sequence of unique vertices $S = (v_1, \ldots, v_k)$ satisfying $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1}N[v_j] \neq \emptyset$ for each $i \in [k]$. Recently, a generalization of this concept called $k$-Grundy domination was introduced. In $k$-Grundy domination, a vertex $v$ can be included in $S$ if it has a neighbor $u$ s… ▽ More The Grundy domination number of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is the length of the longest sequence of unique vertices $S = (v_1, \ldots, v_k)$ satisfying $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1}N[v_j] \neq \emptyset$ for each $i \in [k]$. Recently, a generalization of this concept called $k$-Grundy domination was introduced. In $k$-Grundy domination, a vertex $v$ can be included in $S$ if it has a neighbor $u$ such that $u$ appears in the closed neighborhood of fewer than $k$ vertices of $S$. In this paper, we determine the $k$-Grundy domination number for some families of graphs, find degree-based bounds for the $k$-$L$-Grundy domination number, and define a relationship between the $k$-$Z$-Grundy domination number and the $k$-forcing number of a graph. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

A Proof of the Grundy domination strong product conjecture

Authors: Rebekah Herrman, Stephen G. Z. Smith

Abstract: The Grundy domination number of a simple graph $G = (V,E)$ is the length of the longest sequence of unique vertices $S = (v_1, \ldots, v_k)$, $v_i \in V$, that satisfies the property $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1}N[v_j] \neq \emptyset$ for each $i \in [k]$. Here, $N(v) = \{u : uv \in E\}$ and $N[v] = N(v) \cup \{v\}$. In this note, we prove a recent conjecture about the Grundy domination numbe… ▽ More The Grundy domination number of a simple graph $G = (V,E)$ is the length of the longest sequence of unique vertices $S = (v_1, \ldots, v_k)$, $v_i \in V$, that satisfies the property $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1}N[v_j] \neq \emptyset$ for each $i \in [k]$. Here, $N(v) = \{u : uv \in E\}$ and $N[v] = N(v) \cup \{v\}$. In this note, we prove a recent conjecture about the Grundy domination number of the strong product of two graphs. We then discuss how this result relates to the zero forcing number of the strong product of graphs. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2023; v1 submitted 8 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: There is an error. Some cases were not considered in the proof of Theorem 1

On the length of L-Grundy sequences

Authors: Rebekah Herrman, Stephen G. Z. Smith

Abstract: An L- sequence of a graph $G $ is a sequence of distinct vertices $S = \{v_1, ... , v_k\}$ such that $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1} N(v_j) \neq \emptyset$. The length of the longest L-sequence is called the L-Grundy domination number, denoted $γ_{gr}^L(G)$. In this paper, we prove $γ_{gr}^L(G) \leq n(G) - δ(G) + 1$, which was conjectured by Bre{š}ar, Gologranc, Henning, and Kos. We also prove… ▽ More An L- sequence of a graph $G $ is a sequence of distinct vertices $S = \{v_1, ... , v_k\}$ such that $N[v_i] \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{i-1} N(v_j) \neq \emptyset$. The length of the longest L-sequence is called the L-Grundy domination number, denoted $γ_{gr}^L(G)$. In this paper, we prove $γ_{gr}^L(G) \leq n(G) - δ(G) + 1$, which was conjectured by Bre{š}ar, Gologranc, Henning, and Kos. We also prove some early results about characteristics of $n$-vertex graphs such $γ_{gr}^L(G) = n$, as well as bounds on the change in L-Grundy number under graph operations. △ Less

Submitted 27 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Capture times in the Bridge-burning Cops and Robbers game

Authors: Rebekah Herrman, Peter van Hintum, Stephen G. Z. Smith

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a variant of the cops and robbers game on a graph, introduced by Kinnersley and Peterson, in which every time the robber uses an edge, it is removed from the graph, known as bridge-burning cops and robbers. In particular, we study the maximum time it takes the cops to capture the robber. In this paper, we consider a variant of the cops and robbers game on a graph, introduced by Kinnersley and Peterson, in which every time the robber uses an edge, it is removed from the graph, known as bridge-burning cops and robbers. In particular, we study the maximum time it takes the cops to capture the robber. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 05C57; 49N75; 91A24; 91A46; 91A05; 05C80

On a conjecture of Gentner and Rautenbach

Authors: António Girão, Gábor Mészáros, Stephen G. Z. Smith

Abstract: Gentner and Rautenbach conjectured that the size of a minimum zero forcing set in a connected graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree $3$ is at most $\frac{1}{3}n+2$. We disprove this conjecture by constructing a collection of connected graphs $\{G_n\}$ with maximum degree 3 of arbitrarily large order having zero forcing number at least $\frac{4}{9}|V(G_n)|$. Gentner and Rautenbach conjectured that the size of a minimum zero forcing set in a connected graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree $3$ is at most $\frac{1}{3}n+2$. We disprove this conjecture by constructing a collection of connected graphs $\{G_n\}$ with maximum degree 3 of arbitrarily large order having zero forcing number at least $\frac{4}{9}|V(G_n)|$. △ Less

Submitted 14 December, 2017; v1 submitted 22 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: Typos corrected, Title changed, Abstract changed. Paper is only oriented around the counterexample

The poset on connected graphs is Sperner

Authors: Stephen G. Z. Smith, István Tomon

Abstract: Let $\mathcal{G}$ be the set of all connected graphs on vertex set $[n]$. Define the partial ordering $<$ on $\mathcal{G}$ as follows: for $G,H\in \mathcal{G}$ let $G<H$ if $E(G)\subset E(H)$. The poset $(\mathcal{G},<)$ is graded, each level containing the connected graphs with the same number of edges. We prove that $(\mathcal{G},<)$ has the Sperner property, namely that the largest antichain of… ▽ More Let $\mathcal{G}$ be the set of all connected graphs on vertex set $[n]$. Define the partial ordering $<$ on $\mathcal{G}$ as follows: for $G,H\in \mathcal{G}$ let $G<H$ if $E(G)\subset E(H)$. The poset $(\mathcal{G},<)$ is graded, each level containing the connected graphs with the same number of edges. We prove that $(\mathcal{G},<)$ has the Sperner property, namely that the largest antichain of $(\mathcal{G},<)$ is equal to its largest sized level. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2017; v1 submitted 25 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures

Journal ref: Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. Volume 150, August 2017, Pages 162-181