Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Skeltved, A B

Constraints to do realistic modeling of the electric field ahead of the tip of a lightning leader

Authors: Alexander Broberg Skeltved, Nikolai Østgaard, Andrew Mezentsev, Nikolai Lehtinen, Brant Carlson

Abstract: Several computer models exist to explain the observation of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs). Some of these models estimate the electric field ahead of lightning leaders and its effects on electron acceleration and multiplication. In this paper, we derive a new set of constraints to do more realistic modeling. We determine initial conditions based on in situ measurements of electric field and… ▽ More Several computer models exist to explain the observation of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs). Some of these models estimate the electric field ahead of lightning leaders and its effects on electron acceleration and multiplication. In this paper, we derive a new set of constraints to do more realistic modeling. We determine initial conditions based on in situ measurements of electric field and vertical separation between the main charge layers of thunderclouds. A maximum electric field strength of 50 kV/cm at sea level is introduced as the upper constraint for the leader electric field. The threshold for electron avalanches to develop of 2.86 kV/cm at sea level is introduced as the lower value. With these constraints, we determine a region where acceleration and multiplication of electrons occur. The maximum potential difference in this region is found to be $\sim$52 MV, and the corresponding number of avalanche multiplication lengths is $\sim$3.5. We then quantify the effect of the ambient electric field compared to the leader field at the upper altitude of the negative tip. Finally, we argue that only leaders with the highest potential difference between its tips ($\sim$600 MV) can be candidates for the production of TGFs. However, with the assumptions we have used, these cannot explain the observed maximum energies of at least 40 MeV. Open questions with regard to the temporal development of the streamer zone and its effect on the shape of the electric field remain. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Modeling the relativistic runaway electron avalanche and the feedback mechanism with GEANT4

Authors: Alexander Broberg Skeltved, Nikolai Østgaard, Brant Carlson, Thomas Gjesteland, Sebastien Celestin

Abstract: This paper presents the first study that uses the GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (GEANT4) toolkit to do quantitative comparisons with other modelling results related to the production of Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes (TGFs) and high-energy particle emission from thunderstorms. We will study the Relativistic Runaway Electron Avalanche (RREA) and the relativistic feedback process, as well as the production… ▽ More This paper presents the first study that uses the GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (GEANT4) toolkit to do quantitative comparisons with other modelling results related to the production of Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes (TGFs) and high-energy particle emission from thunderstorms. We will study the Relativistic Runaway Electron Avalanche (RREA) and the relativistic feedback process, as well as the production of bremsstrahlung photons from Runaway Electrons (REs). The Monte Carlo (MC) simulations take into account the effects of electron ionisation, electron by electron (Møller) and electron by positron (Bhabha) scattering as well as the bremsstrahlung process and pair-production, in the $250$ eV$-100$ GeV energy range. Our results indicate that the multiplication of electrons during the development of RREAs and under the influence of feedback, are consistent with previous estimates. This is important to validate GEANT4 as a tool to model RREAs and feedback in homogeneous electric fields. We also determine the ratio of bremsstrahlung photons to energetic electrons $N_γ/N_e$. We then show that the ratio has a dependence on the electric field which can be expressed by the avalanche time $τ(E)$ and the bremsstrahlung coefficient $α(\varepsilon)$. In addition, we present comparisons of GEANT4 simulations performed with a "standard" and a "low-energy" physics list both validated in the $1$ keV$-100$ GeV energy range. This comparison shows that the choice of physics list used in GEANT4 simulations has a significant effect on the results. △ Less

Submitted 25 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.