-
AI Agents That Matter
Authors:
Sayash Kapoor,
Benedikt Stroebl,
Zachary S. Siegel,
Nitya Nadgir,
Arvind Narayanan
Abstract:
AI agents are an exciting new research direction, and agent development is driven by benchmarks. Our analysis of current agent benchmarks and evaluation practices reveals several shortcomings that hinder their usefulness in real-world applications. First, there is a narrow focus on accuracy without attention to other metrics. As a result, SOTA agents are needlessly complex and costly, and the comm…
▽ More
AI agents are an exciting new research direction, and agent development is driven by benchmarks. Our analysis of current agent benchmarks and evaluation practices reveals several shortcomings that hinder their usefulness in real-world applications. First, there is a narrow focus on accuracy without attention to other metrics. As a result, SOTA agents are needlessly complex and costly, and the community has reached mistaken conclusions about the sources of accuracy gains. Our focus on cost in addition to accuracy motivates the new goal of jointly optimizing the two metrics. We design and implement one such optimization, showing its potential to greatly reduce cost while maintaining accuracy. Second, the benchmarking needs of model and downstream developers have been conflated, making it hard to identify which agent would be best suited for a particular application. Third, many agent benchmarks have inadequate holdout sets, and sometimes none at all. This has led to agents that are fragile because they take shortcuts and overfit to the benchmark in various ways. We prescribe a principled framework for avoiding overfitting. Finally, there is a lack of standardization in evaluation practices, leading to a pervasive lack of reproducibility. We hope that the steps we introduce for addressing these shortcomings will spur the development of agents that are useful in the real world and not just accurate on benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language guidance
Authors:
Lionel Wong,
Jiayuan Mao,
Pratyusha Sharma,
Zachary S. Siegel,
Jiahai Feng,
Noa Korneev,
Joshua B. Tenenbaum,
Jacob Andreas
Abstract:
Effective planning in the real world requires not only world knowledge, but the ability to leverage that knowledge to build the right representation of the task at hand. Decades of hierarchical planning techniques have used domain-specific temporal action abstractions to support efficient and accurate planning, almost always relying on human priors and domain knowledge to decompose hard tasks into…
▽ More
Effective planning in the real world requires not only world knowledge, but the ability to leverage that knowledge to build the right representation of the task at hand. Decades of hierarchical planning techniques have used domain-specific temporal action abstractions to support efficient and accurate planning, almost always relying on human priors and domain knowledge to decompose hard tasks into smaller subproblems appropriate for a goal or set of goals. This paper describes Ada (Action Domain Acquisition), a framework for automatically constructing task-specific planning representations using task-general background knowledge from language models (LMs). Starting with a general-purpose hierarchical planner and a low-level goal-conditioned policy, Ada interactively learns a library of planner-compatible high-level action abstractions and low-level controllers adapted to a particular domain of planning tasks. On two language-guided interactive planning benchmarks (Mini Minecraft and ALFRED Household Tasks), Ada strongly outperforms other approaches that use LMs for sequential decision-making, offering more accurate plans and better generalization to complex tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Characterizing the Implicit Bias of Regularized SGD in Rank Minimization
Authors:
Tomer Galanti,
Zachary S. Siegel,
Aparna Gupte,
Tomaso Poggio
Abstract:
We study the bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) to learn low-rank weight matrices when training deep neural networks. Our results show that training neural networks with mini-batch SGD and weight decay causes a bias towards rank minimization over the weight matrices. Specifically, we show, both theoretically and empirically, that this bias is more pronounced when using smaller batch sizes,…
▽ More
We study the bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) to learn low-rank weight matrices when training deep neural networks. Our results show that training neural networks with mini-batch SGD and weight decay causes a bias towards rank minimization over the weight matrices. Specifically, we show, both theoretically and empirically, that this bias is more pronounced when using smaller batch sizes, higher learning rates, or increased weight decay. Additionally, we predict and observe empirically that weight decay is necessary to achieve this bias. Unlike previous literature, our analysis does not rely on assumptions about the data, convergence, or optimality of the weight matrices and applies to a wide range of neural network architectures of any width or depth. Finally, we empirically investigate the connection between this bias and generalization, finding that it has a marginal effect on generalization.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2023; v1 submitted 12 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
