-
Improved online load balancing with known makespan
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Matej Lieskovský,
Sören Schmitt,
Jiří Sgall,
Rob van Stee
Abstract:
We break the barrier of $3/2$ for the problem of online load balancing with known makespan, also known as bin stretching. In this problem, $m$ identical machines and the optimal makespan are given. The load of a machine is the total size of all the jobs assigned to it and the makespan is the maximum load of all the machines. Jobs arrive online and the goal is to assign each job to a machine while…
▽ More
We break the barrier of $3/2$ for the problem of online load balancing with known makespan, also known as bin stretching. In this problem, $m$ identical machines and the optimal makespan are given. The load of a machine is the total size of all the jobs assigned to it and the makespan is the maximum load of all the machines. Jobs arrive online and the goal is to assign each job to a machine while staying within a small factor (the competitive ratio) of the optimal makespan. We present an algorithm that maintains a competitive ratio of $139/93<1.495$ for sufficiently large values of $m$, improving the previous bound of $3/2$. The value 3/2 represents a natural bound for this problem: as long as the online bins are of size at least $3/2$ of the offline bin, all items that fit at least two times in an offline bin have two nice properties. They fit three times in an online bin and a single such item can be packed together with an item of any size in an online bin. These properties are now both lost, which means that putting even one job on a wrong machine can leave some job unassigned at the end. It also makes it harder to determine good thresholds for the item types. This was one of the main technical issues in getting below $3/2$. The analysis consists of an intricate mixture of size and weight arguments.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Structural Properties of Search Trees with 2-way Comparisons
Authors:
Sunny Atalig,
Marek Chrobak,
Erfan Mousavian,
Jiri Sgall,
Pavel Vesely
Abstract:
Optimal 3-way comparison search trees (3WCST's) can be computed using standard dynamic programming in time O(n^3), and this can be further improved to O(n^2) by taking advantage of the Monge property. In contrast, the fastest algorithm in the literature for computing optimal 2-way comparison search trees (2WCST's) runs in time O(n^4). To shed light on this discrepancy, we study structure propertie…
▽ More
Optimal 3-way comparison search trees (3WCST's) can be computed using standard dynamic programming in time O(n^3), and this can be further improved to O(n^2) by taking advantage of the Monge property. In contrast, the fastest algorithm in the literature for computing optimal 2-way comparison search trees (2WCST's) runs in time O(n^4). To shed light on this discrepancy, we study structure properties of 2WCST's. On one hand, we show some new threshold bounds involving key weights that can be helpful in deciding which type of comparison should be at the root of the optimal tree. On the other hand, we also show that the standard techniques for speeding up dynamic programming (the Monge property / quadrangle inequality) do not apply to 2WCST's.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Improved Analysis of Online Balanced Clustering
Authors:
Marcin Bienkowski,
Martin Böhm,
Martin Koutecký,
Thomas Rothvoß,
Jiří Sgall,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
In the online balanced graph repartitioning problem, one has to maintain a clustering of $n$ nodes into $\ell$ clusters, each having $k = n / \ell$ nodes. During runtime, an online algorithm is given a stream of communication requests between pairs of nodes: an inter-cluster communication costs one unit, while the intra-cluster communication is free. An algorithm can change the clustering, paying…
▽ More
In the online balanced graph repartitioning problem, one has to maintain a clustering of $n$ nodes into $\ell$ clusters, each having $k = n / \ell$ nodes. During runtime, an online algorithm is given a stream of communication requests between pairs of nodes: an inter-cluster communication costs one unit, while the intra-cluster communication is free. An algorithm can change the clustering, paying unit cost for each moved node.
This natural problem admits a simple $O(\ell^2 \cdot k^2)$-competitive algorithm COMP, whose performance is far apart from the best known lower bound of $Ω(\ell \cdot k)$. One of open questions is whether the dependency on $\ell$ can be made linear; this question is of practical importance as in the typical datacenter application where virtual machines are clustered on physical servers, $\ell$ is of several orders of magnitude larger than $k$. We answer this question affirmatively, proving that a simple modification of COMP is $(\ell \cdot 2^{O(k)})$-competitive.
On the technical level, we achieve our bound by translating the problem to a system of linear integer equations and using Graver bases to show the existence of a ``small'' solution.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2021; v1 submitted 30 June, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
A $φ$-Competitive Algorithm for Scheduling Packets with Deadlines
Authors:
Pavel Veselý,
Marek Chrobak,
Łukasz Jeż,
Jiří Sgall
Abstract:
In the online packet scheduling problem with deadlines (PacketSchD, for short), the goal is to schedule transmissions of packets that arrive over time in a network switch and need to be sent across a link. Each packet has a deadline, representing its urgency, and a non-negative weight, that represents its priority. Only one packet can be transmitted in any time slot, so if the system is overloaded…
▽ More
In the online packet scheduling problem with deadlines (PacketSchD, for short), the goal is to schedule transmissions of packets that arrive over time in a network switch and need to be sent across a link. Each packet has a deadline, representing its urgency, and a non-negative weight, that represents its priority. Only one packet can be transmitted in any time slot, so if the system is overloaded, some packets will inevitably miss their deadlines and be dropped. In this scenario, the natural objective is to compute a transmission schedule that maximizes the total weight of packets that are successfully transmitted. The problem is inherently online, with the scheduling decisions made without the knowledge of future packet arrivals. The central problem concerning PacketSchD, that has been a subject of intensive study since 2001, is to determine the optimal competitive ratio of online algorithms, namely the worst-case ratio between the optimum total weight of a schedule (computed by an offline algorithm) and the weight of a schedule computed by a (deterministic) online algorithm.
We solve this open problem by presenting a $φ$-competitive online algorithm for PacketSchD (where $φ\approx 1.618$ is the golden ratio), matching the previously established lower bound.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2023; v1 submitted 18 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
On Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming and Speedup
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Łukasz Jeż,
Jiří Sgall,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
In Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming packets of arbitrary sizes arrive over time to be transmitted over a channel in which instantaneous jamming errors occur at times chosen by the adversary and not known to the algorithm. The transmission taking place at the time of jamming is corrupt, and the algorithm learns this fact immediately. An online algorithm maximizes the total size of packets…
▽ More
In Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming packets of arbitrary sizes arrive over time to be transmitted over a channel in which instantaneous jamming errors occur at times chosen by the adversary and not known to the algorithm. The transmission taking place at the time of jamming is corrupt, and the algorithm learns this fact immediately. An online algorithm maximizes the total size of packets it successfully transmits and the goal is to develop an algorithm with the lowest possible asymptotic competitive ratio, where the additive constant may depend on packet sizes.
Our main contribution is a universal algorithm that works for any speedup and packet sizes and, unlike previous algorithms for the problem, it does not need to know these properties in advance. We show that this algorithm guarantees 1-competitiveness with speedup 4, making it the first known algorithm to maintain 1-competitiveness with a moderate speedup in the general setting of arbitrary packet sizes. We also prove a lower bound of $φ+1\approx 2.618$ on the speedup of any 1-competitive deterministic algorithm, showing that our algorithm is close to the optimum.
Additionally, we formulate a general framework for analyzing our algorithm locally and use it to show upper bounds on its competitive ratio for speedups in $[1,4)$ and for several special cases, recovering some previously known results, each of which had a dedicated proof. In particular, our algorithm is 3-competitive without speedup, matching both the (worst-case) performance of the algorithm by Jurdzinski et al. and the lower bound by Anta et al.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 19 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Logarithmic price of buffer downscaling on line metrics
Authors:
Marcin Bienkowski,
Martin Böhm,
Łukasz Jeż,
Paweł Laskoś-Grabowski,
Jan Marcinkowski,
Jiří Sgall,
Aleksandra Spyra,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
We consider the reordering buffer problem on a line consisting of n equidistant points. We show that, for any constant delta, an (offline) algorithm that has a buffer (1-delta) k performs worse by a factor of Omega(log n) than an offline algorithm with buffer k. In particular, this demonstrates that the O(log n)-competitive online algorithm MovingPartition by Gamzu and Segev (ACM Trans. on Algorit…
▽ More
We consider the reordering buffer problem on a line consisting of n equidistant points. We show that, for any constant delta, an (offline) algorithm that has a buffer (1-delta) k performs worse by a factor of Omega(log n) than an offline algorithm with buffer k. In particular, this demonstrates that the O(log n)-competitive online algorithm MovingPartition by Gamzu and Segev (ACM Trans. on Algorithms, 6(1), 2009) is essentially optimal against any offline algorithm with a slightly larger buffer.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2017; v1 submitted 16 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Online Packet Scheduling with Bounded Delay and Lookahead
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Marek Chrobak,
Łukasz Jeż,
Fei Li,
Jiří Sgall,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
We study the online bounded-delay packet scheduling problem (BDPS), where packets of unit size arrive at a router over time and need to be transmitted over a network link. Each packet has two attributes: a non-negative weight and a deadline for its transmission. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. This problem has been well studied in the literature, yet its o…
▽ More
We study the online bounded-delay packet scheduling problem (BDPS), where packets of unit size arrive at a router over time and need to be transmitted over a network link. Each packet has two attributes: a non-negative weight and a deadline for its transmission. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. This problem has been well studied in the literature, yet its optimal competitive ratio remains unknown: the best upper bound is $1.828$, still quite far from the best lower bound of $φ\approx 1.618$.
In the variant of BDPS with $s$-bounded instances, each packet can be scheduled in at most $s$ consecutive slots, starting at its release time. The lower bound of $φ$ applies even to the special case of $2$-bounded instances, and a $φ$-competitive algorithm for $3$-bounded instances was given in Chin et al. Improving that result, and addressing a question posed by Goldwasser, we present a $φ$-competitive algorithm for $4$-bounded instances.
We also study a variant of BDPS where an online algorithm has the additional power of $1$-lookahead, knowing at time $t$ which packets will arrive at time $t+1$. For BDPS with $1$-lookahead restricted to $2$-bounded instances, we present an online algorithm with competitive ratio $(\sqrt{13} - 1)/2 \approx 1.303$ and we prove a nearly tight lower bound of $(1 + \sqrt{17})/4 \approx 1.281$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
A Two-Phase Algorithm for Bin Stretching with Stretching Factor 1.5
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Jiří Sgall,
Rob van Stee,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin.
We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of 1.5 for any number of bins. We build on…
▽ More
Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin.
We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of 1.5 for any number of bins. We build on previous algorithms and use a two-phase approach. However, our analysis is technically more complicated and uses amortization over the bins with the help of two weight functions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2016; v1 submitted 29 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Online Algorithms for Multi-Level Aggregation
Authors:
Marcin Bienkowski,
Martin Böhm,
Jaroslaw Byrka,
Marek Chrobak,
Christoph Dürr,
Lukáš Folwarczný,
Łukasz Jeż,
Jiří Sgall,
Nguyen Kim Thang,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
In the Multi-Level Aggregation Problem (MLAP), requests arrive at the nodes of an edge-weighted tree T, and have to be served eventually. A service is defined as a subtree X of T that contains its root. This subtree X serves all requests that are pending in the nodes of X, and the cost of this service is equal to the total weight of X. Each request also incurs waiting cost between its arrival and…
▽ More
In the Multi-Level Aggregation Problem (MLAP), requests arrive at the nodes of an edge-weighted tree T, and have to be served eventually. A service is defined as a subtree X of T that contains its root. This subtree X serves all requests that are pending in the nodes of X, and the cost of this service is equal to the total weight of X. Each request also incurs waiting cost between its arrival and service times. The objective is to minimize the total waiting cost of all requests plus the total cost of all service subtrees. MLAP is a generalization of some well-studied optimization problems; for example, for trees of depth 1, MLAP is equivalent to the TCP Acknowledgment Problem, while for trees of depth 2, it is equivalent to the Joint Replenishment Problem. Aggregation problem for trees of arbitrary depth arise in multicasting, sensor networks, communication in organization hierarchies, and in supply-chain management. The instances of MLAP associated with these applications are naturally online, in the sense that aggregation decisions need to be made without information about future requests.
Constant-competitive online algorithms are known for MLAP with one or two levels. However, it has been open whether there exist constant competitive online algorithms for trees of depth more than 2. Addressing this open problem, we give the first constant competitive online algorithm for networks of arbitrary (fixed) number of levels. The competitive ratio is O(D^4 2^D), where D is the depth of T. The algorithm works for arbitrary waiting cost functions, including the variant with deadlines.
We also show several additional lower and upper bound results for some special cases of MLAP, including the Single-Phase variant and the case when the tree is a path.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2016; v1 submitted 9 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
General Caching Is Hard: Even with Small Pages
Authors:
Lukáš Folwarczný,
Jiří Sgall
Abstract:
Caching (also known as paging) is a classical problem concerning page replacement policies in two-level memory systems. General caching is the variant with pages of different sizes and fault costs. We give the first NP-hardness result for general caching with small pages: General caching is (strongly) NP-hard even when page sizes are limited to {1, 2, 3}. It holds already in the fault model (each…
▽ More
Caching (also known as paging) is a classical problem concerning page replacement policies in two-level memory systems. General caching is the variant with pages of different sizes and fault costs. We give the first NP-hardness result for general caching with small pages: General caching is (strongly) NP-hard even when page sizes are limited to {1, 2, 3}. It holds already in the fault model (each page has unit fault cost) as well as in the bit model (each page has the same fault cost as size). We also give a very short proof of the strong NP-hardness of general caching with page sizes restricted to {1, 2, 3} and arbitrary costs.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
-
Online Bin Stretching with Three Bins
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Jiří Sgall,
Rob van Stee,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin.
We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of $11/8 = 1.375$ for three bins. Addition…
▽ More
Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin.
We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of $11/8 = 1.375$ for three bins. Additionally, we present a lower bound of $45/33 = 1.\overline{36}$ for Online Bin Stretching on three bins and a lower bound of $19/14$ for four and five bins that were discovered using a computer search.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2016; v1 submitted 22 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Online Colored Bin Packing
Authors:
Martin Böhm,
Jiří Sgall,
Pavel Veselý
Abstract:
In the Colored Bin Packing problem a sequence of items of sizes up to $1$ arrives to be packed into bins of unit capacity. Each item has one of $c\geq 2$ colors and an additional constraint is that we cannot pack two items of the same color next to each other in the same bin. The objective is to minimize the number of bins.
In the important special case when all items have size zero, we characte…
▽ More
In the Colored Bin Packing problem a sequence of items of sizes up to $1$ arrives to be packed into bins of unit capacity. Each item has one of $c\geq 2$ colors and an additional constraint is that we cannot pack two items of the same color next to each other in the same bin. The objective is to minimize the number of bins.
In the important special case when all items have size zero, we characterize the optimal value to be equal to color discrepancy. As our main result, we give an (asymptotically) 1.5-competitive algorithm which is optimal. In fact, the algorithm always uses at most $\lceil1.5\cdot OPT\rceil$ bins and we show a matching lower bound of $\lceil1.5\cdot OPT\rceil$ for any value of $OPT\geq 2$. In particular, the absolute ratio of our algorithm is $5/3$ and this is optimal.
For items of unrestricted sizes we give an asymptotically $3.5$-competitive algorithm. When the items have sizes at most $1/d$ for a real $d \geq 2$ the asymptotic competitive ratio is $1.5+d/(d-1)$. We also show that classical algorithms First Fit, Best Fit and Worst Fit are not constant competitive, which holds already for three colors and small items.
In the case of two colors---the Black and White Bin Packing problem---we prove that all Any Fit algorithms have absolute competitive ratio $3$. When the items have sizes at most $1/d$ for a real $d \geq 2$ we show that the Worst Fit algorithm is absolutely $(1+d/(d-1))$-competitive.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2014; v1 submitted 22 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Better Approximation Bounds for the Joint Replenishment Problem
Authors:
Marcin Bienkowski,
Jaroslaw Byrka,
Marek Chrobak,
Łukasz Jeż,
Jiří Sgall
Abstract:
The Joint Replenishment Problem (JRP) deals with optimizing shipments of goods from a supplier to retailers through a shared warehouse. Each shipment involves transporting goods from the supplier to the warehouse, at a fixed cost C, followed by a redistribution of these goods from the warehouse to the retailers that ordered them, where transporting goods to a retailer $ρ$ has a fixed cost $c_ρ$. I…
▽ More
The Joint Replenishment Problem (JRP) deals with optimizing shipments of goods from a supplier to retailers through a shared warehouse. Each shipment involves transporting goods from the supplier to the warehouse, at a fixed cost C, followed by a redistribution of these goods from the warehouse to the retailers that ordered them, where transporting goods to a retailer $ρ$ has a fixed cost $c_ρ$. In addition, retailers incur waiting costs for each order. The objective is to minimize the overall cost of satisfying all orders, namely the sum of all ship** and waiting costs.
JRP has been well studied in Operations Research and, more recently, in the area of approximation algorithms. For arbitrary waiting cost functions, the best known approximation ratio is 1.8. This ratio can be reduced to 1.574 for the JRP-D model, where there is no cost for waiting but orders have deadlines. As for hardness results, it is known that the problem is APX-hard and that the natural linear program for JRP has integrality gap at least 1.245. Both results hold even for JRP-D. In the online scenario, the best lower and upper bounds on the competitive ratio are 2.64 and 3, respectively. The lower bound of 2.64 applies even to the restricted version of JRP, denoted JRP-L, where the waiting cost function is linear.
We provide several new approximation results for JRP. In the offline case, we give an algorithm with ratio 1.791, breaking the barrier of 1.8. In the online case, we show a lower bound of 2.754 on the competitive ratio for JRP-L (and thus JRP as well), improving the previous bound of 2.64. We also study the online version of JRP-D, for which we prove that the optimal competitive ratio is 2.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Better Bounds for Incremental Frequency Allocation in Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Marek Chrobak,
Łukasz Jeż,
Jiří Sgall
Abstract:
We study frequency allocation in wireless networks. A wireless network is modeled by an undirected graph, with vertices corresponding to cells. In each vertex we have a certain number of requests, and each of those requests must be assigned a different frequency. Edges represent conflicts between cells, meaning that frequencies in adjacent vertices must be different as well. The objective is to mi…
▽ More
We study frequency allocation in wireless networks. A wireless network is modeled by an undirected graph, with vertices corresponding to cells. In each vertex we have a certain number of requests, and each of those requests must be assigned a different frequency. Edges represent conflicts between cells, meaning that frequencies in adjacent vertices must be different as well. The objective is to minimize the total number of used frequencies.
The offline version of the problem is known to be NP-hard. In the incremental version, requests for frequencies arrive over time and the algorithm is required to assign a frequency to a request as soon as it arrives. Competitive incremental algorithms have been studied for several classes of graphs. For paths, the optimal (asymptotic) ratio is known to be 4/3, while for hexagonal-cell graphs it is between 1.5 and 1.9126. For k-colorable graphs, the ratio of (k+1)/2 can be achieved.
In this paper, we prove nearly tight bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio for bipartite graphs, showing that it is between 1.428 and 1.433. This improves the previous lower bound of 4/3 and upper bound of 1.5. Our proofs are based on reducing the incremental problem to a purely combinatorial (equivalent) problem of constructing set families with certain intersection properties.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2011;
originally announced February 2011.
