-
Time delay between images of the lensed quasar UM673
Authors:
E. Koptelova,
W. P. Chen,
T. Chiueh,
B. P Artamonov,
V. L. Oknyanskij,
S. N. Nuritdinov,
O. Burkhonov,
T. Akhunov,
V. V. Bruevich,
O. V. Ezhkova,
A. S. Gusev,
A. A. Sergeyev,
Sh. A. Ehgamberdiev,
M. A. Ibragimov
Abstract:
We study brightness variations in the double lensed quasar UM673 (Q0142-100) with the aim of measuring the time delay between its two images. In the paper we combine our previously published observational data of UM673 obtained during the 2003 - 2005 seasons at the Maidanak Observatory with archival and recently observed Maidanak and CTIO UM673 data. We analyze the V, R and I-band light curves of…
▽ More
We study brightness variations in the double lensed quasar UM673 (Q0142-100) with the aim of measuring the time delay between its two images. In the paper we combine our previously published observational data of UM673 obtained during the 2003 - 2005 seasons at the Maidanak Observatory with archival and recently observed Maidanak and CTIO UM673 data. We analyze the V, R and I-band light curves of the A and B images of UM673, which cover ten observational seasons from August 2001 to November 2010. We also analyze the time evolution of the difference in magnitudes between images A and B of UM673 over more than ten years. We find that the quasar exhibits both short-term (with amplitude of \sim 0.1 mag in the R band) and high-amplitude (\sim 0.3 mag) long-term variability on timescales of about several months and several years, respectively. These brightness variations are used to constrain the time delay between the images of UM673. From cross-correlation analysis of the A and B quasar light curves and error analysis we measure the mean time delay and its error of 89 \pm11 days. Given the input time delay of 88 days, the most probable value of the delay that can be recovered from light curves with the same statistical properties as the observed R-band light curves of UM673 is 95{+5/-16}{+14/-29} days (68 and 95 % confidence intervals). Analysis of the V - I color variations and V, R and I-band magnitude differences of the quasar images does not show clear evidence of the microlensing variations between 1998 and 2010.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2012; v1 submitted 24 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
PG 1115+080: variations of the A2/A1 flux ratio and new values of the time delays
Authors:
V. S. Tsvetkova,
V. G. Vakulik,
V. M. Shulga,
R. E. Schild,
V. N. Dudinov,
A. A. Minakov,
S. N. Nuritdinov,
B. P. Artamonov,
A. Ye. Kochetov,
G. V. Smirnov,
A. A. Sergeyev,
V. V. Konichek,
I. Ye. Sinelnikov,
A. P. Zheleznyak,
V. V. Bruevich,
R. Gaysin,
T. Akhunov,
O. Burkhonov
Abstract:
We report the results of our multicolor observations of PG 1115+080 with the 1.5-m telescope of the Maidanak Observatory (Uzbekistan, Central Asia) in 2001-2006. Monitoring data in filter R spanning the 2004, 2005 and 2006 seasons (76 data points) demonstrate distinct brightness variations of the source quasar with the total amplitude of almost 0.4 mag. Our R light curves have shown image C leadin…
▽ More
We report the results of our multicolor observations of PG 1115+080 with the 1.5-m telescope of the Maidanak Observatory (Uzbekistan, Central Asia) in 2001-2006. Monitoring data in filter R spanning the 2004, 2005 and 2006 seasons (76 data points) demonstrate distinct brightness variations of the source quasar with the total amplitude of almost 0.4 mag. Our R light curves have shown image C leading B by 16.4d and image (A1+A2) by 12d that is inconsistent with the previous estimates obtained by Schechter et al. in 1997 - 24.7d between B and C and 9.4d between (A1+A2) and C. The new values of time delays in PG 1115+080 must result in larger values for the Hubble constant, thus reducing difference between its estimates taken from the gravitational lenses and with other methods. Also, we analyzed variability of the A2/A1 flux ratio, as well as color changes in the archetypal "fold" lens PG 1115+080. We found the A1/A2 flux ratio to grow during 2001-2006 and to be larger at longer wavelengths. In particular, the A2/A1 flux ratio reached 0.85 in filter I in 2006. We also present evidence that both the A1 and A2 images might have undergone microlensing during 2001-2006, with the descending phase for A1 and initial phase for A2. We find that the A2/A1 flux ratio anomaly in PG 1115 can be well explained both by microlensing and by finite distance of the source quasar from the caustic fold.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Time delays in PG1115+080: new estimates
Authors:
V. G. Vakulik,
V. M. Shulga,
R. E. Schild,
V. S. Tsvetkova,
V. N. Dudinov,
A. A. Minakov,
S. N. Nuritdinov,
B. P. Artamonov,
A. Ye. Kochetov,
G. V. Smirnov,
A. A. Sergeyev,
V. V. Konichek,
I. Ye. Sinelnikov,
V. V. Bruevich,
T. Akhunov,
O. Burkhonov
Abstract:
We report new estimates of the time delays in the quadruple gravitationally lensed quasar PG1115+080, obtained from the monitoring data in filter R with the 1.5-m telescope at the Maidanak Mountain (Uzbekistan, Central Asia) in 2004-2006. The time delays are 16.4 days between images C and B, and 12 days between C and A1+A2, with image C being leading for both pairs. The only known estimates of t…
▽ More
We report new estimates of the time delays in the quadruple gravitationally lensed quasar PG1115+080, obtained from the monitoring data in filter R with the 1.5-m telescope at the Maidanak Mountain (Uzbekistan, Central Asia) in 2004-2006. The time delays are 16.4 days between images C and B, and 12 days between C and A1+A2, with image C being leading for both pairs. The only known estimates of the time delays in PG1115 are those based on observations by Schechter et al. (1997) -- 23.7 and 9.4 days between images C and B, C and A1+A2, respectively, as calculated by Schechter et al., and 25 and 13.3 days as revised by Barkana (1997) for the same image components with the use of another method. The new values of time delays in PG 1115+080 may be expected to provide larger estimates of the Hubble constant thus decreasing a diversity between the H_0 estimates taken from gravitationally lensed quasars and with other methods.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2009;
originally announced October 2009.
