Brand vs. Generic: Addressing Non-Adherence, Secular Trends, and Non-Overlap
Authors:
Lamar Hunt III,
Irene B. Murimi,
Jodi B. Segal,
Marissa J. Seamans,
Daniel O. Scharfstein,
Ravi Varadhan
Abstract:
While generic drugs offer a cost-effective alternative to brand name drugs, regulators need a method to assess therapeutic equivalence in a post market setting. We develop such a method in the context of assessing the therapeutic equivalence of immediate release (IM) venlafaxine, based on a large insurance claims dataset provided by OptumLabs\textsuperscript{\textregistered}. To properly address t…
▽ More
While generic drugs offer a cost-effective alternative to brand name drugs, regulators need a method to assess therapeutic equivalence in a post market setting. We develop such a method in the context of assessing the therapeutic equivalence of immediate release (IM) venlafaxine, based on a large insurance claims dataset provided by OptumLabs\textsuperscript{\textregistered}. To properly address this question, our methodology must deal with issues of non-adherence, secular trends in health outcomes, and lack of treatment overlap due to sharp uptake of the generic once it becomes available. We define, identify (under assumptions) and estimate (using G-computation) a causal effect for a time-to-event outcome by extending regression discontinuity to survival curves. We do not find evidence for a lack of therapeutic equivalence of brand and generic IM venlafaxine.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
