-
Timekee** infrastructure for the Catalina Sky Survey
Authors:
Robert L. Seaman,
Alex R. Gibbs
Abstract:
Time domain science forms an increasing fraction of astronomical programs at many facilities. Synoptic and targeted observing modes of transient, varying, and moving sources rely on precise clocks to provide the underlying time tags. Often precision is mistaken for accuracy, or the precise time signals never reach the instrumentation in the first place. We will discuss issues of deploying a stable…
▽ More
Time domain science forms an increasing fraction of astronomical programs at many facilities. Synoptic and targeted observing modes of transient, varying, and moving sources rely on precise clocks to provide the underlying time tags. Often precision is mistaken for accuracy, or the precise time signals never reach the instrumentation in the first place. We will discuss issues of deploying a stable high-precision GNSS clock on a remote mountaintop, and of conveying the resulting time signals to a computer in a way that permits hardware timestam** of the camera shutter (or equivalent) rather than the arbitrary delays encountered with non-real-time data acquisition software. Strengths and limitations of the Network Time Protocol will be reviewed. Timekee** infrastructure deployed for the Catalina Sky Survey will serve as an example.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Solar System Science Roadmap
Authors:
Megan E. Schwamb,
R. Lynne Jones,
Steven R. Chesley,
Alan Fitzsimmons,
Wesley C. Fraser,
Matthew J. Holman,
Henry Hsieh,
Darin Ragozzine,
Cristina A. Thomas,
David E. Trilling,
Michael E. Brown,
Michele T. Bannister,
Dennis Bodewits,
Miguel de Val-Borro,
David Gerdes,
Mikael Granvik,
Michael S. P. Kelley,
Matthew M. Knight,
Robert L. Seaman,
Quan-Zhi Ye,
Leslie A. Young
Abstract:
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is uniquely equipped to search for Solar System bodies due to its unprecedented combination of depth and wide field coverage. Over a ten-year period starting in 2022, LSST will generate the largest catalog of Solar System objects to date. The main goal of the LSST Solar System Science Collaboration (SSSC) is to facilitate the efforts of the planetary comm…
▽ More
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is uniquely equipped to search for Solar System bodies due to its unprecedented combination of depth and wide field coverage. Over a ten-year period starting in 2022, LSST will generate the largest catalog of Solar System objects to date. The main goal of the LSST Solar System Science Collaboration (SSSC) is to facilitate the efforts of the planetary community to study the planets and small body populations residing within our Solar System using LSST data. To prepare for future survey cadence decisions and ensure that interesting and novel Solar System science is achievable with LSST, the SSSC has identified and prioritized key Solar System research areas for investigation with LSST in this roadmap. The ranked science priorities highlighted in this living document will inform LSST survey cadence decisions and aid in identifying software tools and pipelines needed to be developed by the planetary community as added value products and resources before the planned start of LSST science operations.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Machine Learning-based Brokers for Real-time Classification of the LSST Alert Stream
Authors:
Gautham Narayan,
Tayeb Zaidi,
Monika D. Soraisam,
Zhe Wang,
Michelle Lochner,
Thomas Matheson,
Abhijit Saha,
Shuo Yang,
Zhenge Zhao,
John Kececioglu,
Carlos Scheidegger,
Richard T. Snodgrass,
Tim Axelrod,
Tim Jenness,
Robert S. Maier,
Stephen T. Ridgway,
Robert L. Seaman,
Eric Michael Evans,
Navdeep Singh,
Clark Taylor,
Jackson Toeniskoetter,
Eric Welch,
Songzhe Zhu
Abstract:
The unprecedented volume and rate of transient events that will be discovered by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) demands that the astronomical community update its followup paradigm. Alert-brokers -- automated software system to sift through, characterize, annotate and prioritize events for followup -- will be critical tools for managing alert streams in the LSST era. The Arizona-NOAO T…
▽ More
The unprecedented volume and rate of transient events that will be discovered by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) demands that the astronomical community update its followup paradigm. Alert-brokers -- automated software system to sift through, characterize, annotate and prioritize events for followup -- will be critical tools for managing alert streams in the LSST era. The Arizona-NOAO Temporal Analysis and Response to Events System (ANTARES) is one such broker. In this work, we develop a machine learning pipeline to characterize and classify variable and transient sources only using the available multiband optical photometry. We describe three illustrative stages of the pipeline, serving the three goals of early, intermediate and retrospective classification of alerts. The first takes the form of variable vs transient categorization, the second, a multi-class ty** of the combined variable and transient dataset, and the third, a purity-driven subty** of a transient class. While several similar algorithms have proven themselves in simulations, we validate their performance on real observations for the first time. We quantitatively evaluate our pipeline on sparse, unevenly sampled, heteroskedastic data from various existing observational campaigns, and demonstrate very competitive classification performance. We describe our progress towards adapting the pipeline developed in this work into a real-time broker working on live alert streams from time-domain surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Reengineering observatory operations for the time domain
Authors:
Robert L. Seaman,
W. Thomas Vestrand,
Frederic V. Hessman
Abstract:
Observatories are complex scientific and technical institutions serving diverse users and purposes. Their telescopes, instruments, software, and human resources engage in interwoven workflows over a broad range of timescales. These workflows have been tuned to be responsive to concepts of observatory operations that were applicable when various assets were commissioned, years or decades in the pas…
▽ More
Observatories are complex scientific and technical institutions serving diverse users and purposes. Their telescopes, instruments, software, and human resources engage in interwoven workflows over a broad range of timescales. These workflows have been tuned to be responsive to concepts of observatory operations that were applicable when various assets were commissioned, years or decades in the past. The astronomical community is entering an era of rapid change increasingly characterized by large time domain surveys, robotic telescopes and automated infrastructures, and - most significantly - of operating modes and scientific consortia that span our individual facilities, joining them into complex network entities.
Observatories must adapt and numerous initiatives are in progress that focus on redesigning individual components out of the astronomical toolkit. New instrumentation is both more capable and more complex than ever, and even simple instruments may have powerful observation scripting capabilities. Remote and queue observing modes are now widespread. Data archives are becoming ubiquitous. Virtual observatory standards and protocols and astroinformatics data-mining techniques layered on these are areas of active development. Indeed, new large-aperture ground-based telescopes may be as expensive as space missions and have similarly formal project management processes and large data management requirements.
This piecewise approach is not enough. Whatever challenges of funding or politics facing the national and international astronomical communities it will be more efficient - scientifically as well as in the usual figures of merit of cost, schedule, performance, and risks - to explicitly address the systems engineering of the astronomical community as a whole.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
The Colloquium on Decoupling Civil Timekee** from Earth Rotation
Authors:
John H. Seago,
Robert L. Seaman,
Steven L. Allen
Abstract:
On October 5 and October 6, 2011, the Colloquium on the Decoupling Civil Timekee** from Earth Rotation was hosted in Exton, Pennsylvania by Analytical Graphics, Inc. (AGI). This paper highlights various technical perspectives offered through these proceedings, including expressions of concern and various recommendations offered by colloquium participants.
On October 5 and October 6, 2011, the Colloquium on the Decoupling Civil Timekee** from Earth Rotation was hosted in Exton, Pennsylvania by Analytical Graphics, Inc. (AGI). This paper highlights various technical perspectives offered through these proceedings, including expressions of concern and various recommendations offered by colloquium participants.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
-
Optimal DN encoding for CCD detectors
Authors:
Robert L. Seaman,
Richard L. White,
William D. Pence
Abstract:
Image compression has been a frequent topic of presentations at ADASS. Compression is often viewed as just a technique to fit more data into a smaller space. Rather, the packing of data - its "density" - affects every facet of local data handling, long distance data transport, and the end-to-end throughput of workflows. In short, compression is one aspect of proper data structuring. For example,…
▽ More
Image compression has been a frequent topic of presentations at ADASS. Compression is often viewed as just a technique to fit more data into a smaller space. Rather, the packing of data - its "density" - affects every facet of local data handling, long distance data transport, and the end-to-end throughput of workflows. In short, compression is one aspect of proper data structuring. For example, with FITS tile compression the efficient representation of data is combined with an expressive logistical paradigm for its manipulation.
A deeper question remains. Not just how best to represent the data, but which data to represent. CCDs are linear devices. What does this mean? One thing it does not mean is that the analog-to-digital conversion of pixels must be stored using linear data numbers (DN). An alternative strategy of using non- linear representations is presented, with one motivation being to magnify the efficiency of numerical compression algorithms such as Rice.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2009;
originally announced October 2009.
