How is model-related uncertainty quantified and reported in different disciplines?
Authors:
Emily G. Simmonds,
Kwaku Peprah Adjei,
Christoffer Wold Andersen,
Janne Cathrin Hetle Aspheim,
Claudia Battistin,
Nicola Bulso,
Hannah Christensen,
Benjamin Cretois,
Ryan Cubero,
Ivan A. Davidovich,
Lisa Dickel,
Benjamin Dunn,
Etienne Dunn-Sigouin,
Karin Dyrstad,
Sigurd Einum,
Donata Giglio,
Haakon Gjerlow,
Amelie Godefroidt,
Ricardo Gonzalez-Gil,
Soledad Gonzalo Cogno,
Fabian Grosse,
Paul Halloran,
Mari F. Jensen,
John James Kennedy,
Peter Egge Langsaether
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
How do we know how much we know? Quantifying uncertainty associated with our modelling work is the only way we can answer how much we know about any phenomenon. With quantitative science now highly influential in the public sphere and the results from models translating into action, we must support our conclusions with sufficient rigour to produce useful, reproducible results. Incomplete considera…
▽ More
How do we know how much we know? Quantifying uncertainty associated with our modelling work is the only way we can answer how much we know about any phenomenon. With quantitative science now highly influential in the public sphere and the results from models translating into action, we must support our conclusions with sufficient rigour to produce useful, reproducible results. Incomplete consideration of model-based uncertainties can lead to false conclusions with real world impacts. Despite these potentially damaging consequences, uncertainty consideration is incomplete both within and across scientific fields. We take a unique interdisciplinary approach and conduct a systematic audit of model-related uncertainty quantification from seven scientific fields, spanning the biological, physical, and social sciences. Our results show no single field is achieving complete consideration of model uncertainties, but together we can fill the gaps. We propose opportunities to improve the quantification of uncertainty through use of a source framework for uncertainty consideration, model type specific guidelines, improved presentation, and shared best practice. We also identify shared outstanding challenges (uncertainty in input data, balancing trade-offs, error propagation, and defining how much uncertainty is required). Finally, we make nine concrete recommendations for current practice (following good practice guidelines and an uncertainty checklist, presenting uncertainty numerically, and propagating model-related uncertainty into conclusions), future research priorities (uncertainty in input data, quantifying uncertainty in complex models, and the importance of missing uncertainty in different contexts), and general research standards across the sciences (transparency about study limitations and dedicated uncertainty sections of manuscripts).
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Human brain parcellation using time courses of instantaneous connectivity
Authors:
Erik S. B. van Oort,
Maarten Mennes,
Tobias Navarro Schröder,
Vinod J. Kumar,
Nestor I. Zaragoza Jimenez,
Wolfgang Grodd,
Christian F. Doeller,
Christian F. Beckmann
Abstract:
Functional neuroimaging studies have lead to understanding the brain as a collection of spatially segregated functional networks. It is thought that each of these networks is in turn composed of a set of distinct sub-regions that together support each network's function. Considering the sub-regions to be an essential part of the brain's functional architecture, several strategies have been put for…
▽ More
Functional neuroimaging studies have lead to understanding the brain as a collection of spatially segregated functional networks. It is thought that each of these networks is in turn composed of a set of distinct sub-regions that together support each network's function. Considering the sub-regions to be an essential part of the brain's functional architecture, several strategies have been put forward that aim at identifying the functional sub-units of the brain by means of functional parcellations. Current parcellation strategies typically employ a bottom-up strategy, creating a parcellation by clustering smaller units. We propose a novel top-down parcellation strategy, using time courses of instantaneous connectivity to subdivide an initial region of interest into sub-regions. We use split-half reproducibility to choose the optimal number of sub-regions. We apply our Instantaneous Connectivity Parcellation (ICP) strategy on high-quality resting-state FMRI data, and demonstrate the ability to generate parcellations for thalamus, entorhinal cortex, motor cortex, and subcortex including brainstem and striatum. We evaluate the subdivisions against available cytoarchitecture maps to show that the our parcellation strategy recovers biologically valid subdivisions that adhere to known cytoarchitectural features.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2016; v1 submitted 15 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
