Don't Look at the Data! How Differential Privacy Reconfigures the Practices of Data Science
Authors:
Jayshree Sarathy,
Sophia Song,
Audrey Haque,
Tania Schlatter,
Salil Vadhan
Abstract:
Across academia, government, and industry, data stewards are facing increasing pressure to make datasets more openly accessible for researchers while also protecting the privacy of data subjects. Differential privacy (DP) is one promising way to offer privacy along with open access, but further inquiry is needed into the tensions between DP and data science. In this study, we conduct interviews wi…
▽ More
Across academia, government, and industry, data stewards are facing increasing pressure to make datasets more openly accessible for researchers while also protecting the privacy of data subjects. Differential privacy (DP) is one promising way to offer privacy along with open access, but further inquiry is needed into the tensions between DP and data science. In this study, we conduct interviews with 19 data practitioners who are non-experts in DP as they use a DP data analysis prototype to release privacy-preserving statistics about sensitive data, in order to understand perceptions, challenges, and opportunities around using DP. We find that while DP is promising for providing wider access to sensitive datasets, it also introduces challenges into every stage of the data science workflow. We identify ethics and governance questions that arise when socializing data scientists around new privacy constraints and offer suggestions to better integrate DP and data science.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
Advancing computational reproducibility in the Dataverse data repository platform
Authors:
Ana Trisovic,
Philip Durbin,
Tania Schlatter,
Gustavo Durand,
Sonia Barbosa,
Danny Brooke,
Mercè Crosas
Abstract:
Recent reproducibility case studies have raised concerns showing that much of the deposited research has not been reproducible. One of their conclusions was that the way data repositories store research data and code cannot fully facilitate reproducibility due to the absence of a runtime environment needed for the code execution. New specialized reproducibility tools provide cloud-based computatio…
▽ More
Recent reproducibility case studies have raised concerns showing that much of the deposited research has not been reproducible. One of their conclusions was that the way data repositories store research data and code cannot fully facilitate reproducibility due to the absence of a runtime environment needed for the code execution. New specialized reproducibility tools provide cloud-based computational environments for code encapsulation, thus enabling research portability and reproducibility. However, they do not often enable research discoverability, standardized data citation, or long-term archival like data repositories do. This paper addresses the shortcomings of data repositories and reproducibility tools and how they could be overcome to improve the current lack of computational reproducibility in published and archived research outputs.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2020; v1 submitted 6 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
