-
Computing User Equilibria for Schedule-Based Transit Networks with Hard Vehicle Capacities
Authors:
Tobias Harks,
Sven Jäger,
Michael Markl,
Philine Schiewe
Abstract:
Modelling passenger assignments in public transport networks is a fundamental task for city planners, especially when deliberating network infrastructure decisions. A key aspect of a realistic model for passenger assignments is to integrate selfish routing behaviour of passengers on the one hand, and the limited vehicle capacities on the other hand. We formulate a side-constrained user equilibrium…
▽ More
Modelling passenger assignments in public transport networks is a fundamental task for city planners, especially when deliberating network infrastructure decisions. A key aspect of a realistic model for passenger assignments is to integrate selfish routing behaviour of passengers on the one hand, and the limited vehicle capacities on the other hand. We formulate a side-constrained user equilibrium model in a schedule-based time-expanded transit network, where passengers are modelled via a continuum of non-atomic agents that want to travel with a fixed start time from a user-specific origin to a destination. An agent's route may comprise several rides along given lines, each using vehicles with hard loading capacities. We give a characterization of (side-constrained) user equilibria via a quasi-variational inequality and prove their existence by generalizing a well-known existence result of Bernstein and Smith (Transp. Sci., 1994). We further derive a polynomial time algorithm for single-commodity instances and an exact finite time algorithm for the multi-commodity case. Based on our quasi-variational characterization, we finally devise a fast heuristic computing user equilibria, which is tested on real-world instances based on data gained from the Hamburg S-Bahn system and the Swiss long-distance train network. It turns out that w.r.t. the total travel time, the computed user-equilibria are quite efficient compared to a system optimum, which neglects equilibrium constraints and only minimizes total travel time.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The Bus Rapid Transit Investment Problem
Authors:
Rowan Hoogervorst,
Evelien van der Hurk,
Philine Schiewe,
Anita Schöbel,
Reena Urban
Abstract:
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems can provide a fast and reliable service to passengers at low investment costs compared to tram, metro and train systems. Therefore, they can be of great value to attract more passengers to use public transport. This paper thus focuses on the BRT investment problem: Which segments of a single bus line should be upgraded such that the number of newly attracted passeng…
▽ More
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems can provide a fast and reliable service to passengers at low investment costs compared to tram, metro and train systems. Therefore, they can be of great value to attract more passengers to use public transport. This paper thus focuses on the BRT investment problem: Which segments of a single bus line should be upgraded such that the number of newly attracted passengers is maximized? Motivated by the construction of a new BRT line around Copenhagen, we consider a setting in which multiple parties are responsible for the financing of different segments of the line. As each party has a limited willingness to invest, we solve a bi-objective problem to quantify the trade-off between the number of attracted passengers and the investment budget. We model different problem variants: First, we consider two potential passenger responses to upgrades on the line. Second, to prevent scattered upgrades along the line, we consider different restrictions on the number of upgraded connected components on the line. We propose an epsilon-constraint-based algorithm to enumerate the complete set of non-dominated points and investigate the complexity of this problem. Moreover, we perform extensive numerical experiments on artificial instances and a case study based on the BRT line around Copenhagen. Our results show that we can generate the full Pareto front for real-life instances and that the resulting trade-off between investment budget and attracted passengers depends both on the origin-destination demand and on the passenger response to upgrades. Moreover, we illustrate how the generated Pareto plots can assist decision makers in selecting from a set of geographical route alternatives in our case study.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2024; v1 submitted 30 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Line Planning in Public Transport: Bypassing Line Pool Generation
Authors:
Irene Heinrich,
Philine Schiewe,
Constantin Seebach
Abstract:
Line planning, i.e. choosing paths which are operated by one vehicle end-to-end, is an important aspect of public transport planning. While there exists heuristic procedures for generating lines from scratch, most theoretical observations consider the problem of choosing lines from a predefined line pool. In this paper, we consider the complexity of the line planning problem when all simple paths…
▽ More
Line planning, i.e. choosing paths which are operated by one vehicle end-to-end, is an important aspect of public transport planning. While there exists heuristic procedures for generating lines from scratch, most theoretical observations consider the problem of choosing lines from a predefined line pool. In this paper, we consider the complexity of the line planning problem when all simple paths can be used as lines. Depending on the cost structure, we show that the problem can be NP-hard even for paths and stars and that no polynomial time approximation of sub-linear performance is possible. Additionally, we identify polynomially solvable cases and present a pseudo-polynomial solution approach for trees.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Integrated Optimization of Sequential Processes: General Analysis and Application to Public Transport
Authors:
Philine Schiewe,
Anita Schöbel
Abstract:
Planning in public transportation is traditionally done in a sequential process: After the network design process, the lines and their frequencies are planned. When these are fixed, a timetable is determined and based on the timetable, the vehicle and crew schedules are optimized. After each step, passenger routes are adapted to model the behavior of the passengers as realistically as possible. It…
▽ More
Planning in public transportation is traditionally done in a sequential process: After the network design process, the lines and their frequencies are planned. When these are fixed, a timetable is determined and based on the timetable, the vehicle and crew schedules are optimized. After each step, passenger routes are adapted to model the behavior of the passengers as realistically as possible. It has been mentioned in many publications that such a sequential process is sub-optimal, and integrated approaches, mainly heuristics, are under consideration. Sequential planning is not only common in public transportation planning but also in many other applied problems, among others in supply chain management, or in organizing hospitals efficiently.
The contribution of this paper hence is two-fold: on the one hand, we develop an integrated integer programming formulation for the three planning stages line planning, (periodic) timetabling, and vehicle scheduling which also includes the integrated optimization of the passenger routes. This gives us an exact formulation rewriting the sequential approach as an integrated problem. We discuss properties of the integrated formulation and apply it experimentally to data sets from the LinTim library.
On the other hand, we propose a mathematical formulation for general sequential processes which can be used to build integrated formulations. For comparing sequential processes with their integrated counterparts we analyze the price of sequentiality, i.e., the ratio between the solution obtained by the sequential process and an integrated solution. We also experiment with different possibilities for partial integration of a subset of the sequential problems and again illustrate our results using the case of public transportation. The obtained results may be useful for other sequential processes.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2021; v1 submitted 21 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
