Reorientation of Sputnik Planitia implies a Subsurface Ocean on Pluto
Authors:
F. Nimmo,
D. P. Hamilton,
W. B. McKinnon P. M. Schenk,
R. P. Binzel,
C. J. Bierson,
R. A. Beyer,
J. M. Moore,
S. A. Stern,
H. A. Weaver,
C. Olkin,
L. A. Young,
K. E. Smith,
J. R. Spencer,
M. Buie,
B. Buratti,
A. Cheng,
D. Cruikshank,
C. Dalle Ore,
A. Earle,
R. Gladstone,
W. Grundy,
A. D. Howard,
T. Lauer,
I. Linscott,
J. Parker
, et al. (38 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The deep nitrogen-covered Sputnik Planitia (SP; informal name) basin on Pluto is located very close to the longitude of Pluto's tidal axis[1] and may be an impact feature [2], by analogy with other large basins in the solar system[3,4]. Reorientation[5-7] due to tidal and rotational torques can explain SP's location, but requires it to be a positive gravity anomaly[7], despite its negative topogra…
▽ More
The deep nitrogen-covered Sputnik Planitia (SP; informal name) basin on Pluto is located very close to the longitude of Pluto's tidal axis[1] and may be an impact feature [2], by analogy with other large basins in the solar system[3,4]. Reorientation[5-7] due to tidal and rotational torques can explain SP's location, but requires it to be a positive gravity anomaly[7], despite its negative topography. Here we argue that if SP formed via impact and if Pluto possesses a subsurface ocean, a positive gravity anomaly would naturally result because of shell thinning and ocean uplift, followed by later modest N2 deposition. Without a subsurface ocean a positive gravity anomaly requires an implausibly thick N2 layer (greater than 40 km). A rigid, conductive ice shell is required to prolong such an ocean's lifetime to the present day[8] and maintain ocean uplift. Because N2 deposition is latitude-dependent[9], nitrogen loading and reorientation may have exhibited complex feedbacks[7].
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
