-
Common Coil Dipole for High Field Magnet Design and R&D
Authors:
Ramesh Gupta,
Kathleen Amm,
Julien Avronsart,
Michael Anerella,
Anis Ben Yahia,
John Cozzolino,
Piyush Joshi,
Mithlesh Kumar,
Febin Kurian,
Chris Runyan,
William Sampson,
Jesse Schmalzle,
Stephan Kahn,
Ronald Scanlan,
Robert Weggel,
Erich Willen,
Qing** Xu,
Javier Munilla,
Fernando Toral,
Paolo Ferracin,
Steve Gourlay,
GianLuca Sabbi,
Xiaorong Wang,
Danko van der Laan,
Jeremy Weiss
Abstract:
The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design…
▽ More
The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design also uses significantly less conductor (particularly much less HTS), as compared to that in the other designs.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Coupling Current Control in Stabrite-Coated Nbti Rutherford Cables by Varying the Width of a Stainless Steel Core
Authors:
M. D. Sumption,
E. W. Collings,
A. Nijhuis,
R. M. Scanlan
Abstract:
AC loss measurements were made on a series of Rutherford cables wound from stabrite-coated NbTi/Cu multifilamentary strand, from the results of which interstrand contact resistances were calculated. The 28-strand, 15 mm wide, LHC-inner type cables contained stainless steel cores of various widths. Calorimetric loss measurements were made on all samples using a sinusoidal field with an amplitude…
▽ More
AC loss measurements were made on a series of Rutherford cables wound from stabrite-coated NbTi/Cu multifilamentary strand, from the results of which interstrand contact resistances were calculated. The 28-strand, 15 mm wide, LHC-inner type cables contained stainless steel cores of various widths. Calorimetric loss measurements were made on all samples using a sinusoidal field with an amplitude of 400 mT. It is concluded that by adjusting the width of a stainless steel core the effective ICR of a stabrite-coated Rutherford cable can be varied over a wide range, and in particular that a published target of 15 micro-ohm could be attained.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 1999;
originally announced November 1999.
-
AC Loss and Contact Resistance In Copper-Stabilized Nb3Al Rutherford Cables with and without a Stainless Steel Core
Authors:
M. D. Sumption,
R. M. Scanlan,
A. Nijhuis,
E. W. Collings
Abstract:
Calorimetric measurements of AC loss and hence interstrand contact resistance (ICR), were measured on three samples of Rutherford cable wound with Cu-stabilized jelly-roll type unplated Nb3Al strand. One of the cable types was furnished with a thin core of AISI 316L stainless steel and the other two were both uncored but insulated in different ways. The cables were subjected to a room-temperatur…
▽ More
Calorimetric measurements of AC loss and hence interstrand contact resistance (ICR), were measured on three samples of Rutherford cable wound with Cu-stabilized jelly-roll type unplated Nb3Al strand. One of the cable types was furnished with a thin core of AISI 316L stainless steel and the other two were both uncored but insulated in different ways. The cables were subjected to a room-temperature-applied uniaxial pressure of 12 MPa that was maintained during the reaction heat treatment (RHT), then vacuum impregnated with CTD 101 epoxy, and repressurized to 100 MPa during AC-loss measurement. The measurements were performed at 4.2 K in a sinusoidal field of amplitude 400 mT at frequencies of 1 to 90 mHz (no DC-bias field) that was applied both perpendicular and parallel to the face of the cable (the face-on, FO, and edge-on, EO, directions, respectively). For the cored cable the FO-measured effective ICR (FO-ICR), was 5.27 . Those for the uncored cables were less than 0.08 . As shown previously for NbTi- and Nb3Sn-based Rutherford cables, the FO-ICR can be significantly increased by the insertion of a core, although in this case it is still below the range recommended for accelerator-magnet use. Post-measurement dissection of one of the cables showed that the impregnating resin had permeated between the strands and coated the core with a thin, insulating layer excepting for some sintered points of contact. In the uncored cables the strands were coated with resin except for the points of interstrand contact. It is suggested that in the latter case this tendency for partial coating leads to a processing-sensitive FO-ICR.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 1999;
originally announced November 1999.
-
Muon Collider Design
Authors:
R. Palmer,
A. Sessler,
A. Skrinsky,
A. Tollestrup,
A. Baltz,
S. Caspi,
P. Chen,
W-H. Cheng,
Y. Cho,
D. Cline,
E. Courant,
R. Fernow,
J. Gallardo,
A. Garren,
H. Gordon,
M. Green,
R. Gupta,
A. Hershcovitch,
C. Johnstone,
S. Kahn,
H. Kirk,
T. Kycia,
Y. Lee,
D. Lissauer,
A. Luccio
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Muon Colliders have unique technical and physics advantages and disadvantages when compared with both hadron and electron machines. They should thus be regarded as complementary. Parameters are given of 4 TeV and 0.5 TeV high luminosity μ^+ μ^- colliders, and of a 0.5 TeV lower luminosity demonstration machine. We discuss the various systems in such muon colliders, starting from the proton accel…
▽ More
Muon Colliders have unique technical and physics advantages and disadvantages when compared with both hadron and electron machines. They should thus be regarded as complementary. Parameters are given of 4 TeV and 0.5 TeV high luminosity μ^+ μ^- colliders, and of a 0.5 TeV lower luminosity demonstration machine. We discuss the various systems in such muon colliders, starting from the proton accelerator needed to generate the muons and proceeding through muon cooling, acceleration and storage in a collider ring. Detector background, polarization, and nonstandard operating conditions are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 1996;
originally announced April 1996.
-
Beam Dynamics problems in a muon collider
Authors:
R. B. Palmer,
J. C. Gallardo,
R. C. Fernow,
H. Kirk,
I. Stumer,
Y. Y. Lee,
M. Syphers,
Y. Torun,
D. Winn,
D. Neuffer,
Y. Cho,
J. Norem,
N. Mokhov,
R. Noble,
A. Tollestrup,
R. Scanlan,
S. Caspi,
O. Napoly
Abstract:
We discuss the various beam dynamics problems in muon collider systems, starting from the proton accelerator needed to generate the muon beams and proceeding through the muon storage ring.
We discuss the various beam dynamics problems in muon collider systems, starting from the proton accelerator needed to generate the muon beams and proceeding through the muon storage ring.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 1995;
originally announced March 1995.
