Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Saygin, E

Seismic noise characterization at a potential gravitational wave detector site in Australia

Authors: Hamid Satari, Carl Blair, Li Ju, David Blair, Chunnong Zhao, Erdinc Saygin, Patrick Meyers, David Lumley

Abstract: A critical consideration in the design of next generation gravitational wave detectors is the understanding of the seismic environment that can introduce coherent and incoherent noise of seismic origin at different frequencies. We present detailed low-frequency ambient seismic noise characterization (0.1--10~Hz) at the Gingin site in Western Australia. Unlike the microseism band (0.06--1~Hz) for w… ▽ More A critical consideration in the design of next generation gravitational wave detectors is the understanding of the seismic environment that can introduce coherent and incoherent noise of seismic origin at different frequencies. We present detailed low-frequency ambient seismic noise characterization (0.1--10~Hz) at the Gingin site in Western Australia. Unlike the microseism band (0.06--1~Hz) for which the power shows strong correlations with nearby buoy measurements in the Indian Ocean, the seismic spectrum above 1~Hz is a complex superposition of wind induced seismic noise and anthropogenic seismic noise which can be characterized using beamforming to distinguish between the effects of coherent and incoherent wind induced seismic noise combined with temporal variations in the spatio-spectral properties of seismic noise. This also helps characterizing the anthropogenic seismic noise. We show that wind induced seismic noise can either increase or decrease the coherency of background seismic noise for wind speeds above 6~m/s due to the interaction of wind with various surface objects. In comparison to the seismic noise at the Virgo site, the secondary microseism (0.2~Hz) noise level is higher in Gingin, but the seismic noise level between 1 and 10~Hz is lower due to the sparse population and absence of nearby road traffic. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; v1 submitted 14 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: The results have been presented at LVK conference and have been reviewed by LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) P & P, September 2022. 20 pages, 8 figures

Low coherency of wind induced seismic noise: Implications for gravitational wave detection

Authors: Hamid Satari, Carl Blair, Li Ju, Erdinc Saygin, David Blair, Chunnong Zhao, David Lumley, Patrick Meyers

Abstract: Seismic noise poses challenges for gravitational wave detection. Effective vibration isolation and methods to subtract unsheildable Newtonian Noise are examples. Seismic arrays offer one way to deal with these issues assuming seismic coherency. In this paper we find that wind induced seismic noise is incoherent and will dramatically reduce the projected low frequency sensitivity of future gravitat… ▽ More Seismic noise poses challenges for gravitational wave detection. Effective vibration isolation and methods to subtract unsheildable Newtonian Noise are examples. Seismic arrays offer one way to deal with these issues assuming seismic coherency. In this paper we find that wind induced seismic noise is incoherent and will dramatically reduce the projected low frequency sensitivity of future gravitational wave detectors. To quantify this, we measure the coherence length of wind induced seismic noise from 0.06--20~Hz in three distinct locations: close to a building, among tall trees and in shrubs. We show that wind induced seismic noise is ubiquitous and reduces the coherence lengths form several hundred meters to 2--40~m for 0.06--0.1~Hz, from $>$60~m to 3--16~m for 1.5--2.5~Hz and from $>$35~m to 1--16~m around 16.6 Hz frequency bands in the study area. This leads to significant loss of velocity and angular resolution of the array for primary microseism, 5 times worse Newtonian Noise cancellation by wiener filtering at 2~Hz, while it does not pose additional challenge for Newtonian Noise cancellation between 10--20~Hz. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures

Journal ref: Classical and Quantum Gravity 2022

Seismic Inversion by Multi-dimensional Newtonian Machine

Authors: Yuqing Chen, Erdinc Saygin

Abstract: Newtonian machine learning (NML) is a wave-equation inversion method that inverts single-dimensional latent space (LS) features of the seismic data for retrieving the subsurface background velocity model. The single-dimensional LS features mainly contain the kinematic information of the seismic data, which are automatically extracted from the seismic signal by using an autoencoder network. Because… ▽ More Newtonian machine learning (NML) is a wave-equation inversion method that inverts single-dimensional latent space (LS) features of the seismic data for retrieving the subsurface background velocity model. The single-dimensional LS features mainly contain the kinematic information of the seismic data, which are automatically extracted from the seismic signal by using an autoencoder network. Because its LS feature dimension is too small to preserve the dynamic information, such as the waveform variations, of the seismic data. Therefore the NML inversion is not able to recover the high-wavenumber velocity details. To mitigate this problem, we propose to invert multi-dimensional LS features, which can fully represent the entire characters of the seismic data. We denote this method as multi-dimensional Newtonian machine learning (MNML). In MNML, we define a new multi-variable connective function that works together with the multi-variable implicit function theorem to connect the velocity perturbations to the multi-dimensional LS feature perturbations. Numerical tests show that (1) the multi-dimensional LS features can preserve more data information than the single-dimensional LS features; (2) a higher resolution velocity model can be recovered by inverting the multi-dimensional LS features, and the inversion quality is comparable to that of FWI; (3) the MNML method requires a much smaller storage space than conventional FWI because only the low-dimensional representations of the high-dimensional seismic data are needed to be stored. The disadvantage of MNML is that it can more easily get stuck in local minima compared to the NML method. So we suggest a multiscale inversion approach that inverts for higher dimensional LS features as the iteration count increase. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Seismic Inversion by Hybrid Machine Learning

Authors: Yuqing Chen, Erdinc Saygin

Abstract: We present a new seismic inversion method that uses deep learning (DL) features for the subsurface velocity model estimation. The DL feature is a low-dimensional representation of the high-dimensional seismic data, which is automatically generated by a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) and preserved in the latent space. The low-dimensional DL feature contains the key information of the input seismic… ▽ More We present a new seismic inversion method that uses deep learning (DL) features for the subsurface velocity model estimation. The DL feature is a low-dimensional representation of the high-dimensional seismic data, which is automatically generated by a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) and preserved in the latent space. The low-dimensional DL feature contains the key information of the input seismic data. Therefore, instead of directly comparing the waveform differences between the observed and predicted data, such as full-waveform inversion (FWI). We measure their DL feature differences in the latent space of a CAE. The advantage of this low-dimensional comparison is that it is less prone to the cycle-skip** problem compared to FWI. The reason is that the DL features mainly contain the kinematic information, such as traveltime, of the input seismic data when the latent space dimension is small. However, more dynamic information, such as the waveform variations, can be preserved in the DL feature when the latent space dimension becomes larger. Therefore we propose a multiscale inversion approach that starts with inverting the low-dimensional DL features for the low-wavenumber information of the subsurface model. Then recover its high-wavenumber details through inverting the high-dimensional DL features. However, there is no governing equation that contains both the velocity and DL feature terms in the same equation. Therefore we use the automatic differentiation (AD) to numerically connect the perturbation of DL features to the velocity perturbation. In another word, we connect a deep learning network with the wave-equation inversion by using the AD. We denote this hybrid connection as hybrid machine learning (HML) inversion. Here, the AD replaces the complex math derivations of the gradient with a black box so anyone can do HML without having a deep geophysical background. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.