Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Saxena, R R

Improved Streaming Algorithms for Maximum Directed Cut via Smoothed Snapshots

Authors: Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah G. Singer, Madhu Sudan, Santhoshini Velusamy

Abstract: We give an $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$-space single-pass $0.483$-approximation streaming algorithm for estimating the maximum directed cut size (Max-DICUT) in a directed graph on $n$ vertices. This improves over an $O(\log n)$-space $4/9 < 0.45$ approximation algorithm due to Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy (FOCS 2020), which was known to be optimal for $o(\sqrt{n})$-space algorithms. Max-DICUT is a sp… ▽ More We give an $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$-space single-pass $0.483$-approximation streaming algorithm for estimating the maximum directed cut size (Max-DICUT) in a directed graph on $n$ vertices. This improves over an $O(\log n)$-space $4/9 < 0.45$ approximation algorithm due to Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy (FOCS 2020), which was known to be optimal for $o(\sqrt{n})$-space algorithms. Max-DICUT is a special case of a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). In this broader context, we give the first CSP for which algorithms with $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ space can provably outperform $o(\sqrt{n})$-space algorithms. The key technical contribution of our work is development of the notions of a first-order snapshot of a (directed) graph and of estimates of such snapshots. These snapshots can be used to simulate certain (non-streaming) Max-DICUT algorithms, including the "oblivious" algorithms introduced by Feige and Jozeph (Algorithmica, 2015), who showed that one such algorithm achieves a 0.483-approximation. Previous work of the authors (SODA 2023) studied the restricted case of bounded-degree graphs, and observed that in this setting, it is straightforward to estimate the snapshot with $\ell_1$ errors and this suffices to simulate oblivious algorithms. But for unbounded-degree graphs, even defining an achievable and sufficient notion of estimation is subtle. We describe a new notion of snapshot estimation and prove its sufficiency using careful smoothing techniques, and then develop an algorithm which sketches such an estimate via a delicate process of intertwined vertex- and edge-subsampling. Prior to our work, the only streaming algorithms for any CSP on general instances were based on generalizations of the $O(\log n)$-space algorithm for Max-DICUT, and thus our work opens the possibility of a new class of algorithms for approximating CSPs. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 7 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 53 pages, 2 figures; substantial revisions; in submission; abstract shortened to fit requirements

An Improved Lower Bound for Matroid Intersection Prophet Inequalities

Authors: Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Santhoshini Velusamy, S. Matthew Weinberg

Abstract: We consider prophet inequalities subject to feasibility constraints that are the intersection of $q$ matroids. The best-known algorithms achieve a $Θ(q)$-approximation, even when restricted to instances that are the intersection of $q$ partition matroids, and with i.i.d.~Bernoulli random variables. The previous best-known lower bound is $Θ(\sqrt{q})$ due to a simple construction of [Kleinberg-Wein… ▽ More We consider prophet inequalities subject to feasibility constraints that are the intersection of $q$ matroids. The best-known algorithms achieve a $Θ(q)$-approximation, even when restricted to instances that are the intersection of $q$ partition matroids, and with i.i.d.~Bernoulli random variables. The previous best-known lower bound is $Θ(\sqrt{q})$ due to a simple construction of [Kleinberg-Weinberg STOC 2012] (which uses i.i.d.~Bernoulli random variables, and writes the construction as the intersection of partition matroids). We establish an improved lower bound of $q^{1/2+Ω(1/\log \log q)}$ by writing the construction of [Kleinberg-Weinberg STOC 2012] as the intersection of asymptotically fewer partition matroids. We accomplish this via an improved upper bound on the product dimension of a graph with $p^p$ disjoint cliques of size $p$, using recent techniques developed in [Alon-Alweiss European Journal of Combinatorics 2020]. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Streaming complexity of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints

Authors: Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah Singer, Madhu Sudan, Santhoshini Velusamy

Abstract: We initiate a study of the streaming complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) when the constraints arrive in a random order. We show that there exists a CSP, namely $\textsf{Max-DICUT}$, for which random ordering makes a provable difference. Whereas a $4/9 \approx 0.445$ approximation of $\textsf{DICUT}$ requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space with adversarial ordering, we show that with random… ▽ More We initiate a study of the streaming complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) when the constraints arrive in a random order. We show that there exists a CSP, namely $\textsf{Max-DICUT}$, for which random ordering makes a provable difference. Whereas a $4/9 \approx 0.445$ approximation of $\textsf{DICUT}$ requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space with adversarial ordering, we show that with random ordering of constraints there exists a $0.48$-approximation algorithm that only needs $O(\log n)$ space. We also give new algorithms for $\textsf{Max-DICUT}$ in variants of the adversarial ordering setting. Specifically, we give a two-pass $O(\log n)$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a single-pass $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for bounded degree graphs. On the negative side, we prove that CSPs where the satisfying assignments of the constraints support a one-wise independent distribution require $Ω(\sqrt{n})$-space for any non-trivial approximation, even when the constraints are randomly ordered. This was previously known only for adversarially ordered constraints. Extending the results to randomly ordered constraints requires switching the hard instances from a union of random matchings to simple Erdös-Renyi random (hyper)graphs and extending tools that can perform Fourier analysis on such instances. The only CSP to have been considered previously with random ordering is $\textsf{Max-CUT}$ where the ordering is not known to change the approximability. Specifically it is known to be as hard to approximate with random ordering as with adversarial ordering, for $o(\sqrt{n})$ space algorithms. Our results show a richer variety of possibilities and motivate further study of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

99% Revenue with Constant Enhanced Competition

Authors: Linda Cai, Raghuvansh R. Saxena

Abstract: The enhanced competition paradigm is an attempt at bridging the gap between simple and optimal auctions. In this line of work, given an auction setting with $m$ items and $n$ bidders, the goal is to find the smallest $n' \geq n$ such that selling the items to $n'$ bidders through a simple auction generates (almost) the same revenue as the optimal auction. Recently, Feldman, Friedler, and Rubinst… ▽ More The enhanced competition paradigm is an attempt at bridging the gap between simple and optimal auctions. In this line of work, given an auction setting with $m$ items and $n$ bidders, the goal is to find the smallest $n' \geq n$ such that selling the items to $n'$ bidders through a simple auction generates (almost) the same revenue as the optimal auction. Recently, Feldman, Friedler, and Rubinstein [EC, 2018] showed that an arbitrarily large constant fraction of the optimal revenue from selling $m$ items to a single bidder can be obtained via simple auctions with a constant number of bidders. However, their techniques break down even for two bidders, and can only show a bound of $n' = n \cdot O(\log \frac{m}{n})$. Our main result is that $n' = O(n)$ bidders suffice for all values of $m$ and $n$. That is, we show that, for all $m$ and $n$, an arbitrarily large constant fraction of the optimal revenue from selling $m$ items to $n$ bidders can be obtained via simple auctions with $O(n)$ bidders. Moreover, when the items are regular, we can achieve the same result through auctions that are prior-independent, {\em i.e.}, they do not depend on the distribution from which the bidders' valuations are sampled. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: Accepted to Economic and Computing 2021

Exponential Communication Separations between Notions of Selfishness

Authors: Aviad Rubinstein, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Clayton Thomas, S. Mathew Weinberg, Junyao Zhao

Abstract: We consider the problem of implementing a fixed social choice function between multiple players (which takes as input a type $t_i$ from each player $i$ and outputs an outcome $f(t_1,\ldots, t_n)$), in which each player must be incentivized to follow the protocol. In particular, we study the communication requirements of a protocol which: (a) implements $f$, (b) implements $f$ and computes payments… ▽ More We consider the problem of implementing a fixed social choice function between multiple players (which takes as input a type $t_i$ from each player $i$ and outputs an outcome $f(t_1,\ldots, t_n)$), in which each player must be incentivized to follow the protocol. In particular, we study the communication requirements of a protocol which: (a) implements $f$, (b) implements $f$ and computes payments that make it ex-post incentive compatible (EPIC) to follow the protocol, and (c) implements $f$ and computes payments in a way that makes it dominant-strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) to follow the protocol. We show exponential separations between all three of these quantities, already for just two players. That is, we first construct an $f$ such that $f$ can be implemented in communication $c$, but any EPIC implementation of $f$ (with any choice of payments) requires communication $\exp(c)$. This answers an open question of [FS09, BBS13]. Second, we construct an $f$ such that an EPIC protocol implements $f$ with communication $C$, but all DSIC implementations of $f$ require communication $\exp(C)$. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2021; v1 submitted 29 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Separating the Communication Complexity of Truthful and Non-Truthful Combinatorial Auctions

Authors: Sepehr Assadi, Hrishikesh Khandeparkar, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, S. Matthew Weinberg

Abstract: We provide the first separation in the approximation guarantee achievable by truthful and non-truthful combinatorial auctions with polynomial communication. Specifically, we prove that any truthful mechanism guaranteeing a $(\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{240}+\varepsilon)$-approximation for two buyers with XOS valuations over $m$ items requires $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2 \cdot m))$ communication, whereas a non-… ▽ More We provide the first separation in the approximation guarantee achievable by truthful and non-truthful combinatorial auctions with polynomial communication. Specifically, we prove that any truthful mechanism guaranteeing a $(\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{240}+\varepsilon)$-approximation for two buyers with XOS valuations over $m$ items requires $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2 \cdot m))$ communication, whereas a non-truthful algorithm by Dobzinski and Schapira [SODA 2006] and Feige [2009] is already known to achieve a $\frac{3}{4}$-approximation in $poly(m)$ communication. We obtain our separation by proving that any {simultaneous} protocol ({not} necessarily truthful) which guarantees a $(\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{240}+\varepsilon)$-approximation requires communication $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2 \cdot m))$. The taxation complexity framework of Dobzinski [FOCS 2016] extends this lower bound to all truthful mechanisms (including interactive truthful mechanisms). △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Multi-Pass Graph Streaming Lower Bounds for Cycle Counting, MAX-CUT, Matching Size, and Other Problems

Authors: Sepehr Assadi, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Huacheng Yu

Abstract: Consider the following gap cycle counting problem in the streaming model: The edges of a $2$-regular $n$-vertex graph $G$ are arriving one-by-one in a stream and we are promised that $G$ is a disjoint union of either $k$-cycles or $2k$-cycles for some small $k$; the goal is to distinguish between these two cases. Verbin and Yu [SODA 2011] introduced this problem and showed that any single-pass str… ▽ More Consider the following gap cycle counting problem in the streaming model: The edges of a $2$-regular $n$-vertex graph $G$ are arriving one-by-one in a stream and we are promised that $G$ is a disjoint union of either $k$-cycles or $2k$-cycles for some small $k$; the goal is to distinguish between these two cases. Verbin and Yu [SODA 2011] introduced this problem and showed that any single-pass streaming algorithm solving it requires $n^{1-Ω(\frac{1}{k})}$ space. This result and the technique behind it -- the Boolean Hidden Hypermatching communication problem -- has since been used extensively for proving streaming lower bounds for various problems. Despite its significance and broad range of applications, the lower bound technique of Verbin and Yu comes with a key weakness that is inherited by all subsequent results: the Boolean Hidden Hypermatching problem is hard only if there is exactly one round of communication and can be solved with logarithmic communication in two rounds. Therefore, all streaming lower bounds derived from this problem only hold for single-pass algorithms. We prove the first multi-pass lower bound for the gap cycle counting problem: Any $p$-pass streaming algorithm that can distinguish between disjoint union of $k$-cycles vs $2k$-cycles -- or even $k$-cycles vs one Hamiltonian cycle -- requires $n^{1-\frac{1}{k^{Ω(1/p)}}}$ space. As a corollary of this result, we can extend many of previous lower bounds to multi-pass algorithms. For instance, we can now prove that any streaming algorithm that $(1+ε)$-approximates the value of MAX-CUT, maximum matching size, or rank of an $n$-by-$n$ matrix, requires either $n^{Ω(1)}$ space or $Ω(\log{(\frac{1}ε)})$ passes. For all these problems, prior work left open the possibility of even an $O(\log{n})$ space algorithm in only two passes. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: Fixed a mistake in one of the technical lemmas, see Section 1.4

Convex Set Disjointness, Distributed Learning of Halfspaces, and LP Feasibility

Authors: Mark Braverman, Gillat Kol, Shay Moran, Raghuvansh R. Saxena

Abstract: We study the Convex Set Disjointness (CSD) problem, where two players have input sets taken from an arbitrary fixed domain~$U\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ of size $\lvert U\rvert = n$. Their mutual goal is to decide using minimum communication whether the convex hulls of their sets intersect (equivalently, whether their sets can be separated by a hyperplane). Different forms of this problem naturally… ▽ More We study the Convex Set Disjointness (CSD) problem, where two players have input sets taken from an arbitrary fixed domain~$U\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ of size $\lvert U\rvert = n$. Their mutual goal is to decide using minimum communication whether the convex hulls of their sets intersect (equivalently, whether their sets can be separated by a hyperplane). Different forms of this problem naturally arise in distributed learning and optimization: it is equivalent to {\em Distributed Linear Program (LP) Feasibility} -- a basic task in distributed optimization, and it is tightly linked to {\it Distributed Learning of Halfdpaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$}. In {communication complexity theory}, CSD can be viewed as a geometric interpolation between the classical problems of {Set Disjointness} (when~$d\geq n-1$) and {Greater-Than} (when $d=1$). We establish a nearly tight bound of $\tilde Θ(d\log n)$ on the communication complexity of learning halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$. For Convex Set Disjointness (and the equivalent task of distributed LP feasibility) we derive upper and lower bounds of $\tilde O(d^2\log n)$ and~$Ω(d\log n)$. These results improve upon several previous works in distributed learning and optimization. Unlike typical works in communication complexity, the main technical contribution of this work lies in the upper bounds. In particular, our protocols are based on a {\it Container Lemma for Halfspaces} and on two variants of {\it Carathéodory's Theorem}, which may be of independent interest. These geometric statements are used by our protocols to provide a compressed summary of the players' input. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: 37 pages, 8 figures

The menu complexity of "one-and-a-half-dimensional" mechanism design

Authors: Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Ariel Schvartzman, S. Matthew Weinberg

Abstract: We study the menu complexity of optimal and approximately-optimal auctions in the context of the "FedEx" problem, a so-called "one-and-a-half-dimensional" setting where a single bidder has both a value and a deadline for receiving an [FGKK16]. The menu complexity of an auction is equal to the number of distinct (allocation, price) pairs that a bidder might receive [HN13]. We show the following whe… ▽ More We study the menu complexity of optimal and approximately-optimal auctions in the context of the "FedEx" problem, a so-called "one-and-a-half-dimensional" setting where a single bidder has both a value and a deadline for receiving an [FGKK16]. The menu complexity of an auction is equal to the number of distinct (allocation, price) pairs that a bidder might receive [HN13]. We show the following when the bidder has $n$ possible deadlines: - Exponential menu complexity is necessary to be exactly optimal: There exist instances where the optimal mechanism has menu complexity is $2^n-1$. This matches exactly the upper bound provided by Fiat et al.'s algorithm, and resolves one of their open questions [FGKK16]. - Fully polynomial menu complexity is necessary and sufficient for approximation: For all instances, there exists a mechanism guaranteeing a multiplicative (1-ε)-approximation to the optimal revenue with menu complexity $O(n^{3/2}\sqrt{\frac{\min\{n/ε,\ln(v_{\max})\}}ε}) = O(n^2/ε)$, where $v_{\max}$ denotes the largest value in the support of integral distributions. - There exist instances where any mechanism guaranteeing a multiplicative $(1-O(1/n^2))$-approximation to the optimal revenue requires menu complexity $Ω(n^2)$. Our main technique is the polygon approximation of concave functions [Rote19], and our results here should be of independent interest. We further show how our techniques can be used to resolve an open question of [DW17] on the menu complexity of optimal auctions for a budget-constrained buyer. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: Accepted to SODA 2018