-
Smells in System User Interactive Tests
Authors:
Renaud Rwemalika,
Sarra Habchi,
Mike Papadakis,
Yves Le Traon,
Marie-Claude Brasseur
Abstract:
Test smells are known as bad development practices that reflect poor design and implementation choices in software tests. Over the last decade, test smells were heavily studied to measure their prevalence and impacts on test maintainability. However, these studies focused mainly on the unit level and to this day, the work on system tests that interact with the System Under Test through a Graphical…
▽ More
Test smells are known as bad development practices that reflect poor design and implementation choices in software tests. Over the last decade, test smells were heavily studied to measure their prevalence and impacts on test maintainability. However, these studies focused mainly on the unit level and to this day, the work on system tests that interact with the System Under Test through a Graphical User Interface remains limited. To fill the gap, we conduct an exploratory analysis of test smells occurring in System User Interactive Tests (SUIT). First, based on a multi-vocal literature review, we propose a catalog of 35 SUIT-specific smells. Then, we conduct an empirical analysis to assess the prevalence and refactoring of these smells in 48 industrial test suites and 12 open-source projects. We show that the same type of smells tends to appear in industrial and open-source projects, but the symptoms are not addressed in the same way. Smells such as Obscure Test, Sneaky Checking, and Over Checking show symptoms in more than 70% of the tests. Yet refactoring actions are much less frequent with less than 50% of the affected tests ever undergoing refactoring. Interestingly, while refactoring actions are rare, some smells, such as Narcissistic, disappear through the removal of old symptomatic tests and the introduction of new tests not presenting such symptoms.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Data-driven Simulation and Optimization for Covid-19 Exit Strategies
Authors:
Salah Ghamizi,
Renaud Rwemalika,
Lisa Veiber,
Maxime Cordy,
Tegawende F. Bissyande,
Mike Papadakis,
Jacques Klein,
Yves Le Traon
Abstract:
The rapid spread of the Coronavirus SARS-2 is a major challenge that led almost all governments worldwide to take drastic measures to respond to the tragedy. Chief among those measures is the massive lockdown of entire countries and cities, which beyond its global economic impact has created some deep social and psychological tensions within populations. While the adopted mitigation measures (incl…
▽ More
The rapid spread of the Coronavirus SARS-2 is a major challenge that led almost all governments worldwide to take drastic measures to respond to the tragedy. Chief among those measures is the massive lockdown of entire countries and cities, which beyond its global economic impact has created some deep social and psychological tensions within populations. While the adopted mitigation measures (including the lockdown) have generally proven useful, policymakers are now facing a critical question: how and when to lift the mitigation measures? A carefully-planned exit strategy is indeed necessary to recover from the pandemic without risking a new outbreak. Classically, exit strategies rely on mathematical modeling to predict the effect of public health interventions. Such models are unfortunately known to be sensitive to some key parameters, which are usually set based on rules-of-thumb.In this paper, we propose to augment epidemiological forecasting with actual data-driven models that will learn to fine-tune predictions for different contexts (e.g., per country). We have therefore built a pandemic simulation and forecasting toolkit that combines a deep learning estimation of the epidemiological parameters of the disease in order to predict the cases and deaths, and a genetic algorithm component searching for optimal trade-offs/policies between constraints and objectives set by decision-makers. Replaying pandemic evolution in various countries, we experimentally show that our approach yields predictions with much lower error rates than pure epidemiological models in 75% of the cases and achieves a 95% R2 score when the learning is transferred and tested on unseen countries. When used for forecasting, this approach provides actionable insights into the impact of individual measures and strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
FlakiMe: Laboratory-Controlled Test Flakiness Impact Assessment. A Case Study on Mutation Testing and Program Repair
Authors:
Maxime Cordy,
Renaud Rwemalika,
Mike Papadakis,
Mark Harman
Abstract:
Much research on software testing makes an implicit assumption that test failures are deterministic such that they always witness the presence of the same defects. However, this assumption is not always true because some test failures are due to so-called flaky tests, i.e., tests with non-deterministic outcomes. Unfortunately, flaky tests have major implications for testing and test-dependent acti…
▽ More
Much research on software testing makes an implicit assumption that test failures are deterministic such that they always witness the presence of the same defects. However, this assumption is not always true because some test failures are due to so-called flaky tests, i.e., tests with non-deterministic outcomes. Unfortunately, flaky tests have major implications for testing and test-dependent activities such as mutation testing and automated program repair. To deal with this issue, we introduce a test flakiness assessment and experimentation platform, called FlakiMe, that supports the seeding of a (controllable) degree of flakiness into the behaviour of a given test suite. Thereby, FlakiMe equips researchers with ways to investigate the impact of test flakiness on their techniques under laboratory-controlled conditions. We use FlakiME to report results and insights from case studies that assesses the impact of flakiness on mutation testing and program repair. These results indicate that a 5% of flakiness failures is enough to affect the mutation score, but the effect size is modest (2% - 4% ), while it completely annihilates the ability of program repair to patch 50% of the subject programs. We also observe that flakiness has case-specific effects, which mainly disrupts the repair of bugs that are covered by many tests. Moreover, we find that a minimal amount of user feedback is sufficient for alleviating the effects of flakiness.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
