-
Shift-of-Perspective Identification Within Legal Cases
Authors:
Gathika Ratnayaka,
Thejan Rupasinghe,
Nisansa de Silva,
Viraj Salaka Gamage,
Menuka Warushavithana,
Amal Shehan Perera
Abstract:
Arguments, counter-arguments, facts, and evidence obtained via documents related to previous court cases are of essential need for legal professionals. Therefore, the process of automatic information extraction from documents containing legal opinions related to court cases can be considered to be of significant importance. This study is focused on the identification of sentences in legal opinion…
▽ More
Arguments, counter-arguments, facts, and evidence obtained via documents related to previous court cases are of essential need for legal professionals. Therefore, the process of automatic information extraction from documents containing legal opinions related to court cases can be considered to be of significant importance. This study is focused on the identification of sentences in legal opinion texts which convey different perspectives on a certain topic or entity. We combined several approaches based on semantic analysis, open information extraction, and sentiment analysis to achieve our objective. Then, our methodology was evaluated with the help of human judges. The outcomes of the evaluation demonstrate that our system is successful in detecting situations where two sentences deliver different opinions on the same topic or entity. The proposed methodology can be used to facilitate other information extraction tasks related to the legal domain. One such task is the automated detection of counter arguments for a given argument. Another is the identification of opponent parties in a court case.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2019; v1 submitted 6 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Fast Approach to Build an Automatic Sentiment Annotator for Legal Domain using Transfer Learning
Authors:
Viraj Gamage,
Menuka Warushavithana,
Nisansa de Silva,
Amal Shehan Perera,
Gathika Ratnayaka,
Thejan Rupasinghe
Abstract:
This study proposes a novel way of identifying the sentiment of the phrases used in the legal domain. The added complexity of the language used in law, and the inability of the existing systems to accurately predict the sentiments of words in law are the main motivations behind this study. This is a transfer learning approach, which can be used for other domain adaptation tasks as well. The propos…
▽ More
This study proposes a novel way of identifying the sentiment of the phrases used in the legal domain. The added complexity of the language used in law, and the inability of the existing systems to accurately predict the sentiments of words in law are the main motivations behind this study. This is a transfer learning approach, which can be used for other domain adaptation tasks as well. The proposed methodology achieves an improvement of over 6\% compared to the source model's accuracy in the legal domain.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Identifying Relationships Among Sentences in Court Case Transcripts Using Discourse Relations
Authors:
Gathika Ratnayaka,
Thejan Rupasinghe,
Nisansa de Silva,
Menuka Warushavithana,
Viraj Gamage,
Amal Shehan Perera
Abstract:
Case Law has a significant impact on the proceedings of legal cases. Therefore, the information that can be obtained from previous court cases is valuable to lawyers and other legal officials when performing their duties. This paper describes a methodology of applying discourse relations between sentences when processing text documents related to the legal domain. In this study, we developed a mec…
▽ More
Case Law has a significant impact on the proceedings of legal cases. Therefore, the information that can be obtained from previous court cases is valuable to lawyers and other legal officials when performing their duties. This paper describes a methodology of applying discourse relations between sentences when processing text documents related to the legal domain. In this study, we developed a mechanism to classify the relationships that can be observed among sentences in transcripts of United States court cases. First, we defined relationship types that can be observed between sentences in court case transcripts. Then we classified pairs of sentences according to the relationship type by combining a machine learning model and a rule-based approach. The results obtained through our system were evaluated using human judges. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where discourse relationships between sentences have been used to determine relationships among sentences in legal court case transcripts.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2018; v1 submitted 10 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
