Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Rung, A

Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia

Authors: Taha Yasseri, Robert Sumi, András Rung, András Kornai, János Kertész

Abstract: In this work we study the dynamical features of editorial wars in Wikipedia (WP). Based on our previously established algorithm, we build up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples. On short time scales, we show that there is a clear correspondence between conflict and burstiness of activity patterns, and that memory… ▽ More In this work we study the dynamical features of editorial wars in Wikipedia (WP). Based on our previously established algorithm, we build up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples. On short time scales, we show that there is a clear correspondence between conflict and burstiness of activity patterns, and that memory effects play an important role in controversies. On long time scales, we identify three distinct developmental patterns for the overall behavior of the articles. We are able to distinguish cases eventually leading to consensus from those cases where a compromise is far from achievable. Finally, we analyze discussion networks and conclude that edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2012; v1 submitted 16 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Comments: Supporting information added

Journal ref: PLoS ONE 7(6): e38869 (2012)

Edit wars in Wikipedia

Authors: Róbert Sumi, Taha Yasseri, András Rung, András Kornai, János Kertész

Abstract: We present a new, efficient method for automatically detecting severe conflicts `edit wars' in Wikipedia and evaluate this method on six different language WPs. We discuss how the number of edits, reverts, the length of discussions, the burstiness of edits and reverts deviate in such pages from those following the general workflow, and argue that earlier work has significantly over-estimated the c… ▽ More We present a new, efficient method for automatically detecting severe conflicts `edit wars' in Wikipedia and evaluate this method on six different language WPs. We discuss how the number of edits, reverts, the length of discussions, the burstiness of edits and reverts deviate in such pages from those following the general workflow, and argue that earlier work has significantly over-estimated the contentiousness of the Wikipedia editing process. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2012; v1 submitted 19 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables. The current version is shortened to be published in SocialCom 2011

Journal ref: IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 9-11 Oct. 2011, 724-727, Boston, MA, USA