Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans
Authors:
Iosif Lazaridis,
Nick Patterson,
Alissa Mittnik,
Gabriel Renaud,
Swapan Mallick,
Karola Kirsanow,
Peter H. Sudmant,
Joshua G. Schraiber,
Sergi Castellano,
Mark Lipson,
Bonnie Berger,
Christos Economou,
Ruth Bollongino,
Qiaomei Fu,
Kirsten I. Bos,
Susanne Nordenfelt,
Heng Li,
Cesare de Filippo,
Kay Prüfer,
Susanna Sawyer,
Cosimo Posth,
Wolfgang Haak,
Fredrik Hallgren,
Elin Fornander,
Nadin Rohland
, et al. (95 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We sequenced genomes from a $\sim$7,000 year old early farmer from Stuttgart in Germany, an $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherer from Luxembourg, and seven $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherers from southern Sweden. We analyzed these data together with other ancient genomes and 2,345 contemporary humans to show that the great majority of present-day Europeans derive from at least three highly diff…
▽ More
We sequenced genomes from a $\sim$7,000 year old early farmer from Stuttgart in Germany, an $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherer from Luxembourg, and seven $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherers from southern Sweden. We analyzed these data together with other ancient genomes and 2,345 contemporary humans to show that the great majority of present-day Europeans derive from at least three highly differentiated populations: West European Hunter-Gatherers (WHG), who contributed ancestry to all Europeans but not to Near Easterners; Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), who were most closely related to Upper Paleolithic Siberians and contributed to both Europeans and Near Easterners; and Early European Farmers (EEF), who were mainly of Near Eastern origin but also harbored WHG-related ancestry. We model these populations' deep relationships and show that EEF had $\sim$44% ancestry from a "Basal Eurasian" lineage that split prior to the diversification of all other non-African lineages.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2014; v1 submitted 23 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
Reconstructing Native American Migrations from Whole-genome and Whole-exome Data
Authors:
Simon Gravel,
Fouad Zakharia,
Andres Moreno-Estrada,
Jake K Byrnes,
Marina Muzzio,
Juan L. Rodriguez-Flores,
Eimear E. Kenny,
Christopher R. Gignoux,
Brian K. Maples,
Wilfried Guiblet,
Julie Dutil,
Marc Via,
Karla Sandoval,
Gabriel Bedoya,
Taras K Oleksyk,
Andres Ruiz-Linares,
Esteban G Burchard,
Juan Carlos Martinez-Cruzado,
Carlos D. Bustamante,
The 1000 Genomes Project
Abstract:
There is great scientific and popular interest in understanding the genetic history of populations in the Americas. We wish to understand when different regions of the continent were inhabited, where settlers came from, and how current inhabitants relate genetically to earlier populations. Recent studies unraveled parts of the genetic history of the continent using genoty** arrays and uniparenta…
▽ More
There is great scientific and popular interest in understanding the genetic history of populations in the Americas. We wish to understand when different regions of the continent were inhabited, where settlers came from, and how current inhabitants relate genetically to earlier populations. Recent studies unraveled parts of the genetic history of the continent using genoty** arrays and uniparental markers. The 1000 Genomes Project provides a unique opportunity for improving our understanding of population genetic history by providing over a hundred sequenced low coverage genomes and exomes from Colombian (CLM), Mexican-American (MXL), and Puerto Rican (PUR) populations. Here, we explore the genomic contributions of African, European, and Native American ancestry to these populations. Estimated Native American ancestry is 48% in MXL, 25% in CLM, and 13% in PUR. Native American ancestry in PUR is most closely related to populations surrounding the Orinoco River basin, confirming the Southern America ancestry of the Taíno people of the Caribbean. We present new methods to estimate the allele frequencies in the Native American fraction of the populations, and model their distribution using a demographic model for three ancestral Native American populations. These ancestral populations likely split in close succession: the most likely scenario, based on a peopling of the Americas 16 thousand years ago (kya), supports that the MXL Ancestors split 12.2kya, with a subsequent split of the ancestors to CLM and PUR 11.7kya. The model also features effective populations of 62,000 in Mexico, 8,700 in Colombia, and 1,900 in Puerto Rico. Modeling Identity-by-descent and ancestry tract length, we show that post-contact populations differ markedly in their effective sizes and migration patterns, with Puerto Rico showing the smallest effective size and the earlier migration from Europe.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2013; v1 submitted 17 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
