CompartOS: CHERI Compartmentalization for Embedded Systems
Authors:
Hesham Almatary,
Michael Dodson,
Jessica Clarke,
Peter Rugg,
Ivan Gomes,
Michal Podhradsky,
Peter G. Neumann,
Simon W. Moore,
Robert N. M. Watson
Abstract:
Existing high-end embedded systems face frequent security attacks. Software compartmentalization is one technique to limit the attacks' effects to the compromised compartment and not the entire system. Unfortunately, the existing state-of-the-art embedded hardware-software solutions do not work well to enforce software compartmentalization for high-end embedded systems. MPUs are not fine-grained a…
▽ More
Existing high-end embedded systems face frequent security attacks. Software compartmentalization is one technique to limit the attacks' effects to the compromised compartment and not the entire system. Unfortunately, the existing state-of-the-art embedded hardware-software solutions do not work well to enforce software compartmentalization for high-end embedded systems. MPUs are not fine-grained and suffer from significant scalability limitations as they can only protect a small and fixed number of memory regions. On the other hand, MMUs suffer from non-determinism and coarse-grained protection. This paper introduces CompartOS as a lightweight linkage-based compartmentalization model for high-end, complex, mainstream embedded systems. CompartOS builds on CHERI, a capability-based hardware architecture, to meet scalability, availability, compatibility, and fine-grained security goals. Microbenchmarks show that CompartOS' protection-domain crossing is 95% faster than MPU-based IPC. We applied the CompartOS model, with low effort, to complex existing systems, including TCP servers and a safety-critical automotive demo. CompartOS not only catches 10 out of 13 FreeRTOS-TCP published vulnerabilities that MPU-based protection (e.g., uVisor) cannot catch but can also recover from them. Further, our TCP throughput evaluations show that our CompartOS prototype is 52% faster than relevant MPU-based compartmentalization models (e.g., ACES), with a 15% overhead compared to an unprotected system. This comes at an FPGA's LUTs overhead of 10.4% to support CHERI for an unprotected baseline RISC-V processor, compared to 7.6% to support MPU, while CHERI only incurs 1.3% of the registers area overhead compared to 2% for MPU.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2022; v1 submitted 6 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
