-
The case for studying other planetary magnetospheres and atmospheres in Heliophysics
Authors:
Ian J. Cohen,
Chris Arridge,
Abigail Azari,
Chris Bard,
George Clark,
Frank Crary,
Shannon Curry,
Peter Delamere,
Ryan M. Dewey,
Gina A. DiBraccio,
Chuanfei Dong,
Alexander Drozdov,
Austin Egert,
Rachael Filwett,
Jasper Halekas,
Alexa Halford,
Andréa Hughes,
Katherine Garcia-Sage,
Matina Gkioulidou,
Charlotte Goetz,
Cesare Grava,
Michael Hirsch,
Hans Leo F. Huybrighs,
Peter Kollmann,
Laurent Lamy
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Heliophysics is the field that "studies the nature of the Sun, and how it influences the very nature of space - and, in turn, the atmospheres of planetary bodies and the technology that exists there." However, NASA's Heliophysics Division tends to limit study of planetary magnetospheres and atmospheres to only those of Earth. This leaves exploration and understanding of space plasma physics at oth…
▽ More
Heliophysics is the field that "studies the nature of the Sun, and how it influences the very nature of space - and, in turn, the atmospheres of planetary bodies and the technology that exists there." However, NASA's Heliophysics Division tends to limit study of planetary magnetospheres and atmospheres to only those of Earth. This leaves exploration and understanding of space plasma physics at other worlds to the purview of the Planetary Science and Astrophysics Divisions. This is detrimental to the study of space plasma physics in general since, although some cross-divisional funding opportunities do exist, vital elements of space plasma physics can be best addressed by extending the expertise of Heliophysics scientists to other stellar and planetary magnetospheres. However, the diverse worlds within the solar system provide crucial environmental conditions that are not replicated at Earth but can provide deep insight into fundamental space plasma physics processes. Studying planetary systems with Heliophysics objectives, comprehensive instrumentation, and new grant opportunities for analysis and modeling would enable a novel understanding of fundamental and universal processes of space plasma physics. As such, the Heliophysics community should be prepared to consider, prioritize, and fund dedicated Heliophysics efforts to planetary targets to specifically study space physics and aeronomy objectives.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2023; v1 submitted 22 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Exploring Fundamental Particle Acceleration and Loss Processes in Heliophysics through an Orbiting X-ray Instrument in the Jovian System
Authors:
W. Dunn,
G. Berland,
E. Roussos,
G. Clark,
P. Kollmann,
D. Turner,
C. Feldman,
T. Stallard,
G. Branduardi-Raymont,
E. E. Woodfield,
I. J. Rae,
L. C. Ray,
J. A. Carter,
S. T. Lindsay,
Z. Yao,
R. Marshall,
A. N. Jaynes A.,
Y. Ezoe,
M. Numazawa,
G. B. Hospodarsky,
X. Wu,
D. M. Weigt,
C. M. Jackman,
K. Mori,
Q. Nénon
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Jupiter's magnetosphere is considered to be the most powerful particle accelerator in the Solar System, accelerating electrons from eV to 70 MeV and ions to GeV energies. How electromagnetic processes drive energy and particle flows, producing and removing energetic particles, is at the heart of Heliophysics. Particularly, the 2013 Decadal Strategy for Solar and Space Physics was to "Discover and…
▽ More
Jupiter's magnetosphere is considered to be the most powerful particle accelerator in the Solar System, accelerating electrons from eV to 70 MeV and ions to GeV energies. How electromagnetic processes drive energy and particle flows, producing and removing energetic particles, is at the heart of Heliophysics. Particularly, the 2013 Decadal Strategy for Solar and Space Physics was to "Discover and characterize fundamental processes that occur both within the heliosphere and throughout the universe". The Jovian system offers an ideal natural laboratory to investigate all of the universal processes highlighted in the previous Decadal. The X-ray waveband has been widely used to remotely study plasma across astrophysical systems. The majority of astrophysical emissions can be grouped into 5 X-ray processes: fluorescence, thermal/coronal, scattering, charge exchange and particle acceleration. The Jovian system offers perhaps the only system that presents a rich catalog of all of these X-ray emission processes and can also be visited in-situ, affording the special possibility to directly link fundamental plasma processes with their resulting X-ray signatures. This offers invaluable ground-truths for astrophysical objects beyond the reach of in-situ exploration (e.g. brown dwarfs, magnetars or galaxy clusters that map the cosmos). Here, we show how coupling in-situ measurements with in-orbit X-ray observations of Jupiter's radiation belts, Galilean satellites, Io Torus, and atmosphere addresses fundamental heliophysics questions with wide-reaching impact across helio- and astrophysics. New developments like miniaturized X-ray optics and radiation-tolerant detectors, provide compact, lightweight, wide-field X-ray instruments perfectly suited to the Jupiter system, enabling this exciting new possibility.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Space Plasma Physics Science Opportunities for the Lunar Orbital Platform -Gateway
Authors:
Iannis Dandouras,
Matt G G T Taylor,
Johan de Keyser,
Yoshifumi Futaana,
Ruth A Bamford,
Graziella Branduardi-Raymont,
Jean-Yves Chaufray,
Dragos Constantinescu,
Elisabetta de Angelis,
Pierre Devoto,
Jonathan Eastwood,
Marius Echim,
Philippe Garnier,
Benjamin Grison,
David Hercik,
Helmut Lammer,
André Laurens,
François Leblanc,
Anna Milillo,
Rumi Nakamura,
Lubomír Přech,
Elias Roussos,
Štěpán Štverák,
Julien Forest,
Arnaud Trouche
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (LOP-Gateway, or simply Gateway) is a crewed platform that will be assembled and operated in the vicinity of the Moon by NASA and international partner organizations, including ESA, starting from the mid-2020s. It will offer new opportunities for fundamental and applied scientific research. The Moon is a unique location to study the deep space plasma environment.…
▽ More
The Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (LOP-Gateway, or simply Gateway) is a crewed platform that will be assembled and operated in the vicinity of the Moon by NASA and international partner organizations, including ESA, starting from the mid-2020s. It will offer new opportunities for fundamental and applied scientific research. The Moon is a unique location to study the deep space plasma environment. Moreover, the lunar surface and the surface-bounded exosphere are interacting with this environment, constituting a complex multi-scale interacting system. This paper examines the opportunities provided by externally mounted payloads on the Gateway in the field of space plasma physics, heliophysics and space weather, but also examines the impact of the space environment on an inhabited platform in the vicinity of the Moon. It then presents the conceptual design of a model payload, required to perform these space plasma measurements and observations. It results that the Gateway is very well-suited for space plasma physics research. It allows a series of scientific objectives with a multidisciplinary dimension to be addressed.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2022;
originally announced January 2023.
-
On the properties of 0.11 keV to 344 MeV ion spectra in the inner heliosheath using regularized $κ$-distributions
Authors:
Klaus Scherer,
Kostas Dialynas,
Horst Fichtner,
Ander Galli,
Elias Roussos
Abstract:
The shape of the ion energy spectra plays a critical role toward determining the ion energetics, the acceleration mechanisms and the possible sources of different plasma and suprathermal ion populations. The determination of the exact shape of the total particle spectrum, provide the necessary means to address the inner heliosheath (IHS) dynamics. Apart from various modeling efforts, a direct fit…
▽ More
The shape of the ion energy spectra plays a critical role toward determining the ion energetics, the acceleration mechanisms and the possible sources of different plasma and suprathermal ion populations. The determination of the exact shape of the total particle spectrum, provide the necessary means to address the inner heliosheath (IHS) dynamics. Apart from various modeling efforts, a direct fit to the measured ion spectra for an extended energy range of $\sim$0.11 to 344 MeV has not been performed to date.
We use an extended set of combined 0.11-55 keV ENA measurements from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX-Lo and IBEX-Hi) and Cassini/Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA), converted to protons, together with $\sim$28 keV to 344 MeV ion measurements from the Low Energy Charged Particle (LECP) and Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) experiments on Voyager 2, over the declining phase of Solar Cyle 23 (SC23) and ascending phase Solar Cylce 24 (SC24) (2009-2016) to study the characteristics of the particle energy spectrum.
We fit the 0.11 keV to 344 MeV composite spectra with a set of regularized isotropic $κ$-distribution functions (RKD) allowing the determination of the macroscopic physical properties.
We demonstrate that the 2009-2012 spectrum that corresponds to the declining phase of SC23 is well fitted by three different RKDs, while the 2013-2016 spectrum, associated with the rise of SC24, can only be approximated with six different RKDs.
Our results are generally consistent with shock accelerated particles that undergo additional acceleration inside the IHS. We identify a low energy transmitted population of particles, a suprathermal reflected population and a very high energy component that is modulated by GCRs. The 2013-2016 time period is most likely associated with a mixture of particles from SC23 and SC24, which is reflected by the need to employ six RDKs.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
First comparison of composite 0.52-55 keV ENA spectra observed by IBEX and Cassini/INCA with simulated ENAs inferred by proton hybrid simulations downstream of the termination shock
Authors:
Matina Gkioulidou,
M. Opher,
M. Kornbleuth,
K. Dialynas,
J. Giacalone,
J. D. Richardson,
G. P. Zank,
S. A. Fuselier,
D. G. Mitchell,
S. M. Krimigis,
E. Roussos,
I. Baliukin
Abstract:
We present a first comparison of Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) heliosheath measurements, remotely sensed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) mission and the Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA) on the Cassini mission, with modeled ENA inferred from interstellar pickup protons that have been accelerated at the termination shock, using hybrid simulations. The observed ENA intensities are an average…
▽ More
We present a first comparison of Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) heliosheath measurements, remotely sensed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) mission and the Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA) on the Cassini mission, with modeled ENA inferred from interstellar pickup protons that have been accelerated at the termination shock, using hybrid simulations. The observed ENA intensities are an average value over the time period from 2009 to the end of 2012, along the Voyager 2 trajectory. The hybrid simulations parameters for the solar wind, interstellar pickup ions (PUIs), and magnetic field upstream of the termination shock, where Voyager 2 crossed, are based on observations. We report an energy dependent discrepancy between observed and simulated ENA fluxes, with the observed ENA fluxes, being consistently higher than the simulated ones, and discuss possible causes of this discrepancy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Cosmic Ray Intensity Variation Lags Sunspot number: Implications of Late Opening of Solar Magnetic Field
Authors:
Yuming Wang,
**gnan Guo,
Gang Li,
Elias Roussos,
Junwei Zhao
Abstract:
Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), the highly energetic particles that may raise critical health issues for astronauts in space, are modulated by solar activity with their intensity lagging behind the sunspot number (SSN) variation by about one year. Previously, this lag has been attributed to a combined effect of outward convecting solar wind and inward propagating GCRs. However, the lag's amplitude an…
▽ More
Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), the highly energetic particles that may raise critical health issues for astronauts in space, are modulated by solar activity with their intensity lagging behind the sunspot number (SSN) variation by about one year. Previously, this lag has been attributed to a combined effect of outward convecting solar wind and inward propagating GCRs. However, the lag's amplitude and its solar-cycle dependence are still not fully understood (Ross & Chaplin, 2019). By investigating the solar surface magnetic field, we find that the source of heliospheric magnetic field -- the open magnetic flux on the Sun, already lags behind SSN before it convects into heliosphere along with the solar wind. The delay during odd cycles is longer than that during sequential even cycles. Thus, we propose that the GCR lag is primarily due to the greatly late opening of the solar magnetic field with respect to SSN, though solar wind convection and particle transport in the heliosphere also matter. We further investigate the origin of the open flux from different latitudes of the Sun and found that the total open flux is significantly contributed by that from low latitudes where coronal mass ejections frequently occur and also show an odd-even cyclic pattern. Our findings challenge existing theories, and may serve as the physical basis of long-term forecasts radiation dose estimates for manned deep-space exploration missions.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2022; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Magnetic Structure and Propagation of Two Interacting CMEs from the Sun to Saturn
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Emilia K. J. Kilpua,
David Barnes,
Andrei N. Zhukov,
Lan K. Jian,
Olivier Witasse,
Gabrielle Provan,
Chihiro Tao,
Laurent Lamy,
Thomas J. Bradley,
M. Leila Mays,
Christian Möstl,
Elias Roussos,
Yoshifumi Futaana,
Adam Masters,
Beatriz Sánchez-Cano
Abstract:
One of the grand challenges in heliophysics is the characterisation of coronal mass ejection (CME) magnetic structure and evolution from eruption at the Sun through heliospheric propagation. At present, the main difficulties are related to the lack of direct measurements of the coronal magnetic fields and the lack of 3D in-situ measurements of the CME body in interplanetary space. Nevertheless, th…
▽ More
One of the grand challenges in heliophysics is the characterisation of coronal mass ejection (CME) magnetic structure and evolution from eruption at the Sun through heliospheric propagation. At present, the main difficulties are related to the lack of direct measurements of the coronal magnetic fields and the lack of 3D in-situ measurements of the CME body in interplanetary space. Nevertheless, the evolution of a CME magnetic structure can be followed using a combination of multi-point remote-sensing observations and multi-spacecraft in-situ measurements as well as modelling. Accordingly, we present in this work the analysis of two CMEs that erupted from the Sun on 28 April 2012. We follow their eruption and early evolution using remote-sensing data, finding indications of CME--CME interaction, and then analyse their interplanetary counterpart(s) using in-situ measurements at Venus, Earth, and Saturn. We observe a seemingly single flux rope at all locations, but find possible signatures of interaction at Earth, where high-cadence plasma data are available. Reconstructions of the in-situ flux ropes provide almost identical results at Venus and Earth but show greater discrepancies at Saturn, suggesting that the CME was highly distorted and/or that further interaction with nearby solar wind structures took place before 10 AU. This work highlights the difficulties in connecting structures from the Sun to the outer heliosphere and demonstrates the importance of multi-spacecraft studies to achieve a deeper understanding of the magnetic configuration of CMEs.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Reply to comment on "An Active Plume Eruption on Europa During Galileo Flyby E26 as Indicated by Energetic Proton Depletions"
Authors:
H. L. F. Huybrighs,
E. Roussos,
A. Blöcker,
N. Krupp,
Y. Futaana,
S. Barabash,
L. Z. Hadid,
M. K. G. Holmberg,
O. Witasse
Abstract:
In Huybrighs et al., 2020 we investigated energetic proton depletions along Galileo's Europa flyby E26. Based on a particle tracing analysis we proposed that depletions are caused by perturbed electrogmagnetic fields combined with atmospheric charge exchange and possible plumes. One depletion feature identified as a plume signature was shown to be an artefact Jia et al., 2021. Despite that, here w…
▽ More
In Huybrighs et al., 2020 we investigated energetic proton depletions along Galileo's Europa flyby E26. Based on a particle tracing analysis we proposed that depletions are caused by perturbed electrogmagnetic fields combined with atmospheric charge exchange and possible plumes. One depletion feature identified as a plume signature was shown to be an artefact Jia et al., 2021. Despite that, here we emphasize that Huybrighs et al., 2020 demonstrates that plumes can cause proton depletions and that these features should be sought after. Furthermore, the conclusions on the importance of perturbed electromagnetic fields and atmospheric charge exchange on the depletions are unaffected. We suggest that the artefact's cause is a mistagging of protons as heavier ions by EPD. The artefact prevents us from confirming or excluding that there is a plume associated depletion. We also address comments on the MHD simulations and demonstrate that 540-1040 keV losses are not necessarily inconsistent with 115-244 keV losses by plume associated charge exchange.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
The radiation belts of Jupiter and Saturn
Authors:
Elias Roussos,
Peter Kollmann
Abstract:
The era of outer planet orbiters (Galileo, Juno and Cassini) is advancing our understanding of how the radiation belts of Jupiter and Saturn are structured, form and evolve well beyond what had been possible during the age of flyby missions and ground-based observations. The nearly two decades-long datasets of these missions, in the context of detailed and long-term observations of Earth's radiati…
▽ More
The era of outer planet orbiters (Galileo, Juno and Cassini) is advancing our understanding of how the radiation belts of Jupiter and Saturn are structured, form and evolve well beyond what had been possible during the age of flyby missions and ground-based observations. The nearly two decades-long datasets of these missions, in the context of detailed and long-term observations of Earth's radiation belts, highlight which of the processes that accelerate particles to relativistic kinetic energies and limit their flux intensity can be considered more universal, and thus key for most extraterrestrial magnetospheres, and which reflect the unique aspects of each planet and its magnetospheric system. In this chapter we focus on the in-situ radiation belt observations in the context of theory, simulations and relevant measurements by Earth-based observatories. We describe both the average state and the time variations of Jupiter's and Saturn's radiation belts and associate them with specific physical processes.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Photometric analyses of Saturn's small moons: Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are dark; Helene and Calypso are bright
Authors:
M. M. Hedman,
P. Helfenstein,
R. O. Chancia,
P. Thomas,
E. Roussos,
C. Paranicas,
A. J. Verbiscer
Abstract:
We examine the surface brightnesses of Saturn's smaller satellites using a photometric model that explicitly accounts for their elongated shapes and thus facilitates comparisons among different moons. Analyses of Cassini imaging data with this model reveals that the moons Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are darker than one would expect given trends previously observed among the nearby mid-sized satel…
▽ More
We examine the surface brightnesses of Saturn's smaller satellites using a photometric model that explicitly accounts for their elongated shapes and thus facilitates comparisons among different moons. Analyses of Cassini imaging data with this model reveals that the moons Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are darker than one would expect given trends previously observed among the nearby mid-sized satellites. On the other hand, the trojan moons Calypso and Helene have substantially brighter surfaces than their co-orbital companions Tethys and Dione. These observations are inconsistent with the moons' surface brightnesses being entirely controlled by the local flux of E-ring particles, and therefore strongly imply that other phenomena are affecting their surface properties. The darkness of Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene is correlated with the fluxes of high-energy protons, implying that high-energy radiation is responsible for darkening these small moons. Meanwhile, Prometheus and Pandora appear to be brightened by their interactions with nearby dusty F ring, implying that enhanced dust fluxes are most likely responsible for Calypso's and Helene's excess brightness. However, there are no obvious structures in the E ring that would preferentially brighten these two moons, so there must either be something subtle in the E-ring particles' orbital properties that leads to asymmetries in the relevant fluxes, or something happened recently to temporarily increase these moons' brightnesses.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2020; v1 submitted 19 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
The in-situ exploration of Jupiter's radiation belts (A White Paper submitted in response to ESA's Voyage 2050 Call)
Authors:
Elias Roussos,
Oliver Allanson,
Nicolas André,
Bruna Bertucci,
Graziella Branduardi-Raymont,
George Clark,
Kostantinos Dialynas,
Iannis Dandouras,
Ravindra Desai,
Yoshifumi Futaana,
Matina Gkioulidou,
Geraint Jones,
Peter Kollmann,
Anna Kotova,
Elena Kronberg,
Norbert Krupp,
Go Murakami,
Quentin Nénon,
Tom Nordheim,
Benjamin Palmaerts,
Christina Plainaki,
Jonathan Rae,
Daniel Santos-Costa,
Theodore Sarris,
Yuri Shprits
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Jupiter has the most energetic and complex radiation belts in our solar system. Their hazardous environment is the reason why so many spacecraft avoid rather than investigate them, and explains how they have kept many of their secrets so well hidden, despite having been studied for decades. In this White Paper we argue why these secrets are worth unveiling. Jupiter's radiation belts and the vast m…
▽ More
Jupiter has the most energetic and complex radiation belts in our solar system. Their hazardous environment is the reason why so many spacecraft avoid rather than investigate them, and explains how they have kept many of their secrets so well hidden, despite having been studied for decades. In this White Paper we argue why these secrets are worth unveiling. Jupiter's radiation belts and the vast magnetosphere that encloses them constitute an unprecedented physical laboratory, suitable for both interdisciplinary and novel scientific investigations: from studying fundamental high energy plasma physics processes which operate throughout the universe, such as adiabatic charged particle acceleration and nonlinear wave-particle interactions; to exploiting the astrobiological consequences of energetic particle radiation. The in-situ exploration of the uninviting environment of Jupiter's radiation belts present us with many challenges in mission design, science planning, instrumentation and technology development. We address these challenges by reviewing the different options that exist for direct and indirect observation of this unique system. We stress the need for new instruments, the value of synergistic Earth and Jupiter-based remote sensing and in-situ investigations, and the vital importance of multi-spacecraft, in-situ measurements. While simultaneous, multi-point in-situ observations have long become the standard for exploring electromagnetic interactions in the inner solar system, they have never taken place at Jupiter or any strongly magnetized planet besides Earth. We conclude that a dedicated multi-spacecraft mission to Jupiter's radiation belts is an essential and obvious way forward and deserves to be given a high priority in ESA's Voyage 2050 programme.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Enceladus and Titan: Emerging Worlds of the Solar System (ESA Voyage 2050 White Paper)
Authors:
Ali Sulaiman,
Nicholas Achilleos,
Sushil Atreya,
Cesar Bertucci,
Andrew Coates,
Michele Dougherty,
Lina Hadid,
Candice Hansen,
Mika Holmberg,
Hsiang-Wen Hsu,
Tomoki Kimura,
William Kurth,
Alice Le Gall,
James McKevitt,
Michiko Morooka,
Go Murakami,
Leonardo Regoli,
Elias Roussos,
Joachim Saur,
Oleg Shebanits,
Anezina Solomonidou,
Jan-Erik Wahlund,
J. Hunter Waite
Abstract:
Some of the major discoveries of the recent Cassini-Huygens mission have put Titan and Enceladus firmly on the Solar System map. The mission has revolutionised our view of Solar System satellites, arguably matching their scientific importance with that of their planet. While Cassini-Huygens has made big surprises in revealing Titan's organically rich environment and Enceladus' cryovolcanism, the m…
▽ More
Some of the major discoveries of the recent Cassini-Huygens mission have put Titan and Enceladus firmly on the Solar System map. The mission has revolutionised our view of Solar System satellites, arguably matching their scientific importance with that of their planet. While Cassini-Huygens has made big surprises in revealing Titan's organically rich environment and Enceladus' cryovolcanism, the mission's success naturally leads us to further probe these findings. We advocate the acknowledgement of Titan and Enceladus science as highly relevant to ESA's long-term roadmap, as logical follow-on to Cassini-Huygens. In this white paper, we will outline important science questions regarding these satellites and identify the pertinent science themes we recommend ESA cover during the Voyage 2050 planning cycle. Addressing these science themes would make major advancements to the present knowledge we have about the Solar System, its formation, evolution and likelihood that other habitable environments exist outside the Earth's biosphere.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2019; v1 submitted 5 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Ice Giant Systems: The Scientific Potential of Orbital Missions to Uranus and Neptune
Authors:
Leigh N. Fletcher,
Ravit Helled,
Elias Roussos,
Geraint Jones,
Sébastien Charnoz,
Nicolas André,
David Andrews,
Michele Bannister,
Emma Bunce,
Thibault Cavalié,
Francesca Ferri,
Jonathan Fortney,
Davide Grassi,
Léa Griton,
Paul Hartogh,
Ricardo Hueso,
Yohai Kaspi,
Laurent Lamy,
Adam Masters,
Henrik Melin,
Julianne Moses,
Olivier Mousis,
Nadine Nettleman,
Christina Plainaki,
Jürgen Schmidt
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Uranus and Neptune, and their diverse satellite and ring systems, represent the least explored environments of our Solar System, and yet may provide the archetype for the most common outcome of planetary formation throughout our galaxy. Ice Giants will be the last remaining class of Solar System planet to have a dedicated orbital explorer, and international efforts are under way to realise such an…
▽ More
Uranus and Neptune, and their diverse satellite and ring systems, represent the least explored environments of our Solar System, and yet may provide the archetype for the most common outcome of planetary formation throughout our galaxy. Ice Giants will be the last remaining class of Solar System planet to have a dedicated orbital explorer, and international efforts are under way to realise such an ambitious mission in the coming decades. In 2019, the European Space Agency released a call for scientific themes for its strategic science planning process for the 2030s and 2040s, known as Voyage 2050. We used this opportunity to review our present-day knowledge of the Uranus and Neptune systems, producing a revised and updated set of scientific questions and motivations for their exploration. This review article describes how such a mission could explore their origins, ice-rich interiors, dynamic atmospheres, unique magnetospheres, and myriad icy satellites, to address questions at the heart of modern planetary science. These two worlds are superb examples of how planets with shared origins can exhibit remarkably different evolutionary paths: Neptune as the archetype for Ice Giants, whereas Uranus may be atypical. Exploring Uranus' natural satellites and Neptune's captured moon Triton could reveal how Ocean Worlds form and remain active, redefining the extent of the habitable zone in our Solar System. For these reasons and more, we advocate that an Ice Giant System explorer should become a strategic cornerstone mission within ESA's Voyage 2050 programme, in partnership with international collaborators, and targeting launch opportunities in the early 2030s.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2020; v1 submitted 4 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Authors:
Abigail Rymer,
Kathleen Mandt,
Dana Hurley,
Carey Lisse,
Noam Izenberg,
H. Todd Smith,
Joseph Westlake,
Emma Bunce,
Christopher Arridge,
Adam Masters,
Mark Hofstadter,
Amy Simon,
Pontus Brandt,
George Clark,
Ian Cohen,
Robert Allen,
Sarah Vine,
Kenneth Hansen,
George Hospodarsky,
William Kurth,
Paul Romani,
Laurent Lamy,
Philippe Zarka,
Hao Cao,
Carol Paty
, et al. (88 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of s…
▽ More
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Empirical probability model of the cold plasma environment in Jovian inner magnetosphere
Authors:
Yoshifumi Futaana,
Xiao-Dong Wang,
Elias Roussos,
Pete Trouscott,
Daniel Heynderickx,
Fabrice Cipriani,
David Rodgers
Abstract:
A new empirical, analytical model of cold plasma (< 10 keV) in the Jovian inner magnetosphere is constructed. Plasmas in this energy range impact surface charging. A new feature of this model is predicting each plasma parameter for a specified probability (percentile). The new model was produced as follows. We start from a reference model for each plasma parameter, which was scaled to fit the data…
▽ More
A new empirical, analytical model of cold plasma (< 10 keV) in the Jovian inner magnetosphere is constructed. Plasmas in this energy range impact surface charging. A new feature of this model is predicting each plasma parameter for a specified probability (percentile). The new model was produced as follows. We start from a reference model for each plasma parameter, which was scaled to fit the data of Galileo plasma spectrometer. The scaled model was then represented as a function of radial distance, magnetic local time, and magnetic latitude, presumably describing the mean states. Then, the deviation of the observed values from the model were attribute to the variability in the environment, which was accounted for by the percentile at a given location.The input parameters for this model are the spacecraft position and the percentile. The model is inteded to be used for the JUICE mission analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Cassini observations of Saturn's southern polar cusp
Authors:
C. S. Arridge,
J. M. Jasinski,
N. Achilleos,
Y. V. Bogdanova,
E. J. Bunce,
S. W. H. Cowley,
A. N. Fazakerley,
K. K. Khurana,
L. Lamy,
J. S. Leisner,
E. Roussos,
C. T. Russell,
P. Zarka,
A. J. Coates,
M. K. Dougherty,
G. H. Jones,
S. M. Krimigis,
N. Krupp
Abstract:
The magnetospheric cusps are important sites of the coupling of a magnetosphere with the solar wind. The combination of both ground- and space-based observations at Earth have enabled considerable progress to be made in understanding the terrestrial cusp and its role in the coupling of the magnetosphere to the solar wind via the polar magnetosphere. Voyager 2 fully explored Neptune's cusp in 1989…
▽ More
The magnetospheric cusps are important sites of the coupling of a magnetosphere with the solar wind. The combination of both ground- and space-based observations at Earth have enabled considerable progress to be made in understanding the terrestrial cusp and its role in the coupling of the magnetosphere to the solar wind via the polar magnetosphere. Voyager 2 fully explored Neptune's cusp in 1989 but highly inclined orbits of the Cassini spacecraft at Saturn present the most recent opportunity to repeatedly studying the polar magnetosphere of a rapidly rotating planet. In this paper we discuss observations made by Cassini during two passes through Saturn's southern polar magnetosphere. Our main findings are that i) Cassini directly encounters the southern polar cusp with evidence for the entry of magnetosheath plasma into the cusp via magnetopause reconnection, ii) magnetopause reconnection and entry of plasma into the cusp can occur over a range of solar wind conditions, and iii) double cusp morphologies are consistent with the position of the cusp oscillating in phase with Saturn's global magnetospheric periodicities.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
