Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Ross, M C

.
  1. arXiv:2203.06164  [pdf, ps, other

    hep-ex hep-ph physics.acc-ph

    Higgs Factory Considerations

    Authors: J. A. Bagger, B. C. Barish, S. Belomestnykh, P. C. Bhat, J. E. Brau, M. Demarteau, D. Denisov, S. C. Eno, C. G. R. Geddes, P. D. Grannis, A. Hutton, A. J. Lankford, M. U. Liepe, D. B. MacFarlane, T. Markiewicz, H. E. Montgomery, J. R. Patterson, M. Perelstein, M. E. Peskin, M. C. Ross, J. Strube, A. P. White, G. W. Wilson

    Abstract: We discuss considerations that can be used to formulate recommendations for initiating a lepton collider project that would provide precision studies of the Higgs boson and related electroweak phenomena.

    Submitted 17 March, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: contribution to Snowmass 2021

  2. arXiv:2011.04427  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.HE

    Supernova X-Ray Database (SNaX) Updated to Ensure Long-term Stability

    Authors: Alexandra Nisenoff, Vikram V. Dwarkadas, Mathias C. Ross

    Abstract: The Supernova X-Ray Database (SNaX) was established a few years ago to make X-ray data on supernovae (SNe) publicly available via an elegant searchable web interface. The database has recently been updated to PhP7, had security updates done, and moved to a new server, ensuring its long-term stability. We urge astronomers to continue to download the data as needed for their work. Those with X-ray d… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

    Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure. Published in the Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society. Just a small reminder to astronomers to use the database for X-ray data on SNe, and to upload your data on X-ray SNe to the database

    Journal ref: Res. Notes AAS, 4, 195 (2020)

  3. arXiv:1308.0735  [pdf

    physics.acc-ph

    Wall-plug (AC) power consumption of a very high energy e+/e- storage ring collider

    Authors: Marc C. Ross

    Abstract: Estimated AC power consumption ranges from ~280 MW (1) to 416 MW (2) for a 350 GeV E_cm 80 km circumference colliding beam storage ring complex with parameters given in (1). The difference between the two estimates is from differing assumptions concerning heat removal, cryo-plant efficiency, klystron operation etc. The purpose of this note is to list and explain these. (1) Mike Koratzinos, et al… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.