Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Rorden, C

False Discovery Rate and Localizing Power

Authors: Anderson M. Winkler, Paul A. Taylor, Thomas E. Nichols, Chris Rorden

Abstract: False discovery rate (FDR) is commonly used for correction for multiple testing in neuroimaging studies. However, when using two-tailed tests, making directional inferences about the results can lead to vastly inflated error rate, even approaching 100\% in some cases. This happens because FDR only provides weak control over the error rate, meaning that the proportion of error is guaranteed only gl… ▽ More False discovery rate (FDR) is commonly used for correction for multiple testing in neuroimaging studies. However, when using two-tailed tests, making directional inferences about the results can lead to vastly inflated error rate, even approaching 100\% in some cases. This happens because FDR only provides weak control over the error rate, meaning that the proportion of error is guaranteed only globally over all tests, not within subsets, such as among those in only one or another direction. Here we consider and evaluate different strategies for FDR control with two-tailed tests, using both synthetic and real imaging data. Approaches that separate the tests by direction of the hypothesis test, or by the direction of the resulting test statistic, more properly control the directional error rate and preserve FDR benefits, albeit with a doubled risk of errors under complete absence of signal. Strategies that combine tests in both directions, or that use simple two-tailed p-values, can lead to invalid directional conclusions, even if these tests remain globally valid. To enable valid thresholding for directional inference, we suggest that imaging software should allow the possibility that the user sets asymmetrical thresholds for the two sides of the statistical map. While FDR continues to be a valid, powerful procedure for multiple testing correction, care is needed when making directional inferences for two-tailed tests, or more broadly, when making any localized inference. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 27 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, 39 references

Quantifying predictive uncertainty of aphasia severity in stroke patients with sparse heteroscedastic Bayesian high-dimensional regression

Authors: Anja Zgodic, Ray Bai, Jiajia Zhang, Yuan Wang, Chris Rorden, Alexander McLain

Abstract: Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. For example, Aphasia Quotient (AQ) is a critical measure of language impairment and informs treatment decisions, but it is challenging to measure in stroke patients. It is of interest to use high-resolution T2 neuroimages of brain damage to predict AQ… ▽ More Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. For example, Aphasia Quotient (AQ) is a critical measure of language impairment and informs treatment decisions, but it is challenging to measure in stroke patients. It is of interest to use high-resolution T2 neuroimages of brain damage to predict AQ. However, sparse regression models show marked evidence of heteroscedastic error even after transformations are applied. This violation of the homoscedasticity assumption can lead to bias in estimated coefficients, prediction intervals (PI) with improper length, and increased type I errors. Bayesian heteroscedastic linear regression models relax the homoscedastic error assumption but can enforce restrictive prior assumptions on parameters, and many are computationally infeasible in the high-dimensional setting. This paper proposes estimating high-dimensional heteroscedastic linear regression models using a heteroscedastic partitioned empirical Bayes Expectation Conditional Maximization (H-PROBE) algorithm. H-PROBE is a computationally efficient maximum a posteriori estimation approach that requires minimal prior assumptions and can incorporate covariates hypothesized to impact heterogeneity. We apply this method by using high-dimensional neuroimages to predict and provide PIs for AQ that accurately quantify predictive uncertainty. Our analysis demonstrates that H-PROBE can provide narrower PI widths than standard methods without sacrificing coverage. Narrower PIs are clinically important for determining the risk of moderate to severe aphasia. Additionally, through extensive simulation studies, we exhibit that H-PROBE results in superior prediction, variable selection, and predictive inference compared to alternative methods. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2024; v1 submitted 15 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

The Past, Present, and Future of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)

Authors: Russell A. Poldrack, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Stefan Appelhoff, Yoni K. Ashar, Tibor Auer, Sylvain Baillet, Shashank Bansal, Leandro Beltrachini, Christian G. Benar, Giacomo Bertazzoli, Suyash Bhogawar, Ross W. Blair, Marta Bortoletto, Mathieu Boudreau, Teon L. Brooks, Vince D. Calhoun, Filippo Maria Castelli, Patricia Clement, Alexander L Cohen, Julien Cohen-Adad, Sasha D'Ambrosio, Gilles de Hollander, María de la iglesia-Vayá, Alejandro de la Vega, Arnaud Delorme , et al. (89 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves.… ▽ More The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS. △ Less

Submitted 8 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

False Discovery Rate Control for Lesion-Symptom Map** with Heterogeneous data via Weighted P-values

Authors: Siyu Zheng, Alexander C. McLain, Joshua Habiger, Christopher Rorden, Julius Fridriksson

Abstract: Lesion-symptom map** studies provide insight into what areas of the brain are involved in different aspects of cognition. This is commonly done via behavioral testing in patients with a naturally occurring brain injury or lesions (e.g., strokes or brain tumors). This results in high-dimensional observational data where lesion status (present/absent) is non-uniformly distributed with some voxels… ▽ More Lesion-symptom map** studies provide insight into what areas of the brain are involved in different aspects of cognition. This is commonly done via behavioral testing in patients with a naturally occurring brain injury or lesions (e.g., strokes or brain tumors). This results in high-dimensional observational data where lesion status (present/absent) is non-uniformly distributed with some voxels having lesions in very few (or no) subjects. In this situation, mass univariate hypothesis tests have severe power heterogeneity where many tests are known a priori to have little to no power. Recent advancements in multiple testing methodologies allow researchers to weigh hypotheses according to side-information (e.g., information on power heterogeneity). In this paper, we propose the use of p-value weighting for voxel-based lesion-symptom map** (VLSM) studies. The weights are created using the distribution of lesion status and spatial information to estimate different non-null prior probabilities for each hypothesis test through some common approaches. We provide a monotone minimum weight criterion which requires minimum a priori power information. Our methods are demonstrated on dependent simulated data and an aphasia study investigating which regions of the brain are associated with the severity of language impairment among stroke survivors. The results demonstrate that the proposed methods have robust error control and can increase power. Further, we showcase how weights can be used to identify regions that are inconclusive due to lack of power. △ Less

Submitted 16 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

MSC Class: 62J15

brainlife.io: A decentralized and open source cloud platform to support neuroscience research

Authors: Soichi Hayashi, Bradley A. Caron, Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld, Sophia Vinci-Booher, Brent McPherson, Daniel N. Bullock, Giulia Bertò, Guiomar Niso, Sandra Hanekamp, Daniel Levitas, Kimberly Ray, Anne MacKenzie, Lindsey Kitchell, Josiah K. Leong, Filipi Nascimento-Silva, Serge Koudoro, Hanna Willis, Jasleen K. Jolly, Derek Pisner, Taylor R. Zuidema, Jan W. Kurzawski, Kyriaki Mikellidou, Aurore Bussalb, Christopher Rorden, Conner Victory , et al. (39 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to red… ▽ More Neuroscience research has expanded dramatically over the past 30 years by advancing standardization and tool development to support rigor and transparency. Consequently, the complexity of the data pipeline has also increased, hindering access to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperabile, and Reusable) data analysis to portions of the worldwide research community. brainlife.io was developed to reduce these burdens and democratize modern neuroscience research across institutions and career levels. Using community software and hardware infrastructure, the platform provides open-source data standardization, management, visualization, and processing and simplifies the data pipeline. brainlife.io automatically tracks the provenance history of thousands of data objects, supporting simplicity, efficiency, and transparency in neuroscience research. Here brainlife.io's technology and data services are described and evaluated for validity, reliability, reproducibility, replicability, and scientific utility. Using data from 4 modalities and 3,200 participants, we demonstrate that brainlife.io's services produce outputs that adhere to best practices in modern neuroscience research. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.