-
Joint galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering constraints on galaxy formation
Authors:
Malin Renneby,
Bruno M. B. Henriques,
Stefan Hilbert,
Dylan Nelson,
Mark Vogelsberger,
Raúl E. Angulo,
Volker Springel,
Lars Hernquist
Abstract:
We compare predictions for galaxy-galaxy lensing profiles and clustering from the Henriques et al. (2015) public version of the Munich semi-analytical model of galaxy formation (SAM) and the IllustrisTNG suite, primarily TNG300, with observations from KiDS+GAMA and SDSS-DR7 using four different selection functions for the lenses (stellar mass, stellar mass and group membership, stellar mass and is…
▽ More
We compare predictions for galaxy-galaxy lensing profiles and clustering from the Henriques et al. (2015) public version of the Munich semi-analytical model of galaxy formation (SAM) and the IllustrisTNG suite, primarily TNG300, with observations from KiDS+GAMA and SDSS-DR7 using four different selection functions for the lenses (stellar mass, stellar mass and group membership, stellar mass and isolation criteria, stellar mass and colour). We find that this version of the SAM does not agree well with the current data for stellar mass-only lenses with $M_\ast > 10^{11}\,M_\odot$. By decreasing the merger time for satellite galaxies as well as reducing the radio-mode AGN accretion efficiency in the SAM, we obtain better agreement, both for the lensing and the clustering, at the high mass end. We show that the new model is consistent with the signals for central galaxies presented in Velliscig et al. (2017). Turning to the hydrodynamical simulation, TNG300 produces good lensing predictions, both for stellar mass-only ($χ^2 = 1.81$ compared to $χ^2 = 7.79$ for the SAM), and locally brightest galaxies samples ($χ^2 = 3.80$ compared to $χ^2 = 5.01$). With added dust corrections to the colours it matches the SDSS clustering signal well for red low mass galaxies. We find that both the SAMs and TNG300 predict $\sim 50\,\%$ excessive lensing signals for intermediate mass red galaxies with $10.2 < \log_{10} M_\ast [ M_\odot ] < 11.2$ at $r \approx 0.6\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}$, which require further theoretical development.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020; v1 submitted 3 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Comparing galaxy formation in the L-GALAXIES semi-analytical model and the IllustrisTNG simulations
Authors:
Mohammadreza Ayromlou,
Dylan Nelson,
Robert M. Yates,
Guinevere Kauffmann,
Malin Renneby,
Simon D. M. White
Abstract:
We perform a comparison, object-by-object and statistically, between the Munich semi-analytical model, L-Galaxies, and the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical simulations. By running L-Galaxies on the IllustrisTNG dark matter-only merger trees, we identify the same galaxies in the two models. This allows us to compare the stellar mass, star formation rate and gas content of galaxies, as well as the baryon…
▽ More
We perform a comparison, object-by-object and statistically, between the Munich semi-analytical model, L-Galaxies, and the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical simulations. By running L-Galaxies on the IllustrisTNG dark matter-only merger trees, we identify the same galaxies in the two models. This allows us to compare the stellar mass, star formation rate and gas content of galaxies, as well as the baryonic content of subhaloes and haloes in the two models. We find that both the stellar mass functions and the stellar masses of individual galaxies agree to better than $\sim0.2\,$dex. On the other hand, specific star formation rates and gas contents can differ more substantially. At $z=0$ the transition between low-mass star-forming galaxies and high-mass, quenched galaxies occurs at a stellar mass scale $\sim0.5\,$dex lower in IllustrisTNG than in L-Galaxies. IllustrisTNG also produces substantially more quenched galaxies at higher redshifts. Both models predict a halo baryon fraction close to the cosmic value for clusters, but IllustrisTNG predicts lower baryon fractions in group environments. These differences are due primarily to differences in modelling feedback from stars and supermassive black holes. The gas content and star formation rates of galaxies in and around clusters and groups differ substantially, with IllustrisTNG satellites less star-forming and less gas-rich. We show that environmental processes such as ram-pressure strip** are stronger and operate to larger distances and for a broader host mass range in IllustrisTNG. We suggest that the treatment of galaxy evolution in the semi-analytic model needs to be improved by prescriptions which capture local environmental effects more accurately.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Halo mass and weak galaxy-galaxy lensing profiles in rescaled cosmological $N$-body simulations
Authors:
Malin Renneby,
Stefan Hilbert,
Raúl E. Angulo
Abstract:
We investigate 3D density and weak lensing profiles of dark matter haloes predicted by a cosmology-rescaling algorithm for $N$-body simulations. We extend the rescaling method of Angulo & White (2010) and Angulo & Hilbert (2015) to improve its performance on intra-halo scales by using models for the concentration-mass-redshift relation based on excursion set theory. The accuracy of the method is t…
▽ More
We investigate 3D density and weak lensing profiles of dark matter haloes predicted by a cosmology-rescaling algorithm for $N$-body simulations. We extend the rescaling method of Angulo & White (2010) and Angulo & Hilbert (2015) to improve its performance on intra-halo scales by using models for the concentration-mass-redshift relation based on excursion set theory. The accuracy of the method is tested with numerical simulations carried out with different cosmological parameters. We find that predictions for median density profiles are more accurate than $\sim 5\,\%$ for haloes with masses of $10^{12.0} - 10^{14.5} h^{-1}\,M_{\odot}$ for radii $0.05 < r/r_{200\text{m}} < 0.5$, and for cosmologies with $Ω_\text{m} \in [0.15,\,0.40]$ and $σ_8 \in [0.6,\,1.0]$. For larger radii, $0.5 < r/r_{200\text{m}} < 5$, the accuracy degrades to $\sim20\,\%$, due to inaccurate modelling of the cosmological and redshift dependence of the splashback radius. For changes in cosmology allowed by current data, the residuals decrease to $\lesssim2\,\%$ up to scales twice the virial radius. We illustrate the usefulness of the method by estimating the mean halo mass of a mock galaxy group sample. We find that the algorithm's accuracy is sufficient for current data. Improvements in the algorithm, particularly in the modelling of baryons, are likely required for interpreting future (dark energy task force stage IV) experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2018; v1 submitted 9 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in massive bigravity
Authors:
Jonas Enander,
Yashar Akrami,
Edvard Mortsell,
Malin Renneby,
Adam R. Solomon
Abstract:
We study the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect in ghost-free, massive bigravity. We focus on the infinite-branch bigravity (IBB) model which exhibits viable cosmic expansion histories and stable linear perturbations, while the cosmological constant is set to zero and the late-time accelerated expansion of the Universe is due solely to the gravitational interaction terms. The ISW contribution to…
▽ More
We study the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect in ghost-free, massive bigravity. We focus on the infinite-branch bigravity (IBB) model which exhibits viable cosmic expansion histories and stable linear perturbations, while the cosmological constant is set to zero and the late-time accelerated expansion of the Universe is due solely to the gravitational interaction terms. The ISW contribution to the CMB auto-correlation power spectrum is predicted, as well as the cross-correlation between the CMB temperature anisotropies and large-scale structure. We use ISW amplitudes as observed by the WMAP 9-year temperature data together with galaxy and AGN data provided by the WISE mission in order to compare the theoretical predictions to the observations. The ISW amplitudes in IBB are found to be larger than the corresponding ones in the standard LCDM model by roughly a factor of 1.5, but are still consistent with the observations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2015; v1 submitted 9 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
