Choroidalyzer: An open-source, end-to-end pipeline for choroidal analysis in optical coherence tomography
Authors:
Justin Engelmann,
Jamie Burke,
Charlene Hamid,
Megan Reid-Schachter,
Dan Pugh,
Neeraj Dhaun,
Diana Moukaddem,
Lyle Gray,
Niall Strang,
Paul McGraw,
Amos Storkey,
Paul J. Steptoe,
Stuart King,
Tom MacGillivray,
Miguel O. Bernabeu,
Ian J. C. MacCormick
Abstract:
Purpose: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index.
Methods: We used 5,600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, 6 systemic disease cohorts, 3 device types, 2 manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following ma…
▽ More
Purpose: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index.
Methods: We used 5,600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, 6 systemic disease cohorts, 3 device types, 2 manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following manual correction of inaccurate segmentations, with foveal positions manually annotated. We trained a U-Net deep-learning model to detect the region, vessels, and fovea to calculate choroid thickness, area, and vascular index in a fovea-centred region of interest. We analysed segmentation agreement (AUC, Dice) and choroid metrics agreement (Pearson, Spearman, mean absolute error (MAE)) in internal and external test sets. We compared Choroidalyzer to two manual graders on a small subset of external test images and examined cases of high error.
Results: Choroidalyzer took 0.299 seconds per image on a standard laptop and achieved excellent region (Dice: internal 0.9789, external 0.9749), very good vessel segmentation performance (Dice: internal 0.8817, external 0.8703) and excellent fovea location prediction (MAE: internal 3.9 pixels, external 3.4 pixels). For thickness, area, and vascular index, Pearson correlations were 0.9754, 0.9815, and 0.8285 (internal) / 0.9831, 0.9779, 0.7948 (external), respectively (all p<0.0001). Choroidalyzer's agreement with graders was comparable to the inter-grader agreement across all metrics.
Conclusions: Choroidalyzer is an open-source, end-to-end pipeline that accurately segments the choroid and reliably extracts thickness, area, and vascular index. Especially choroidal vessel segmentation is a difficult and subjective task, and fully-automatic methods like Choroidalyzer could provide objectivity and standardisation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
An open-source deep learning algorithm for efficient and fully-automatic analysis of the choroid in optical coherence tomography
Authors:
Jamie Burke,
Justin Engelmann,
Charlene Hamid,
Megan Reid-Schachter,
Tom Pearson,
Dan Pugh,
Neeraj Dhaun,
Stuart King,
Tom MacGillivray,
Miguel O. Bernabeu,
Amos Storkey,
Ian J. C. MacCormick
Abstract:
Purpose: To develop an open-source, fully-automatic deep learning algorithm, DeepGPET, for choroid region segmentation in optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Methods: We used a dataset of 715 OCT B-scans (82 subjects, 115 eyes) from 3 clinical studies related to systemic disease. Ground truth segmentations were generated using a clinically validated, semi-automatic choroid segmentation method…
▽ More
Purpose: To develop an open-source, fully-automatic deep learning algorithm, DeepGPET, for choroid region segmentation in optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Methods: We used a dataset of 715 OCT B-scans (82 subjects, 115 eyes) from 3 clinical studies related to systemic disease. Ground truth segmentations were generated using a clinically validated, semi-automatic choroid segmentation method, Gaussian Process Edge Tracing (GPET). We finetuned a UNet with MobileNetV3 backbone pre-trained on ImageNet. Standard segmentation agreement metrics, as well as derived measures of choroidal thickness and area, were used to evaluate DeepGPET, alongside qualitative evaluation from a clinical ophthalmologist. Results: DeepGPET achieves excellent agreement with GPET on data from 3 clinical studies (AUC=0.9994, Dice=0.9664; Pearson correlation of 0.8908 for choroidal thickness and 0.9082 for choroidal area), while reducing the mean processing time per image on a standard laptop CPU from 34.49s ($\pm$15.09) using GPET to 1.25s ($\pm$0.10) using DeepGPET. Both methods performed similarly according to a clinical ophthalmologist, who qualitatively judged a subset of segmentations by GPET and DeepGPET, based on smoothness and accuracy of segmentations. Conclusions: DeepGPET, a fully-automatic, open-source algorithm for choroidal segmentation, will enable researchers to efficiently extract choroidal measurements, even for large datasets. As no manual interventions are required, DeepGPET is less subjective than semi-automatic methods and could be deployed in clinical practice without necessitating a trained operator.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023; v1 submitted 3 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
