Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results
Authors:
Xiaoliang Luo,
Akilles Rechardt,
Guangzhi Sun,
Kevin K. Nejad,
Felipe Yáñez,
Bati Yilmaz,
Kangjoo Lee,
Alexandra O. Cohen,
Valentina Borghesani,
Anton Pashkov,
Daniele Marinazzo,
Jonathan Nicholas,
Alessandro Salatiello,
Ilia Sucholutsky,
Pasquale Minervini,
Sepehr Razavi,
Roberta Rocca,
Elkhan Yusifov,
Tereza Okalova,
Nianlong Gu,
Martin Ferianc,
Mikail Khona,
Kaustubh R. Patil,
Pui-Shee Lee,
Rui Mata
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific discoveries often hinge on synthesizing decades of research, a task that potentially outstrips human information processing capacities. Large language models (LLMs) offer a solution. LLMs trained on the vast scientific literature could potentially integrate noisy yet interrelated findings to forecast novel results better than human experts. To evaluate this possibility, we created Brain…
▽ More
Scientific discoveries often hinge on synthesizing decades of research, a task that potentially outstrips human information processing capacities. Large language models (LLMs) offer a solution. LLMs trained on the vast scientific literature could potentially integrate noisy yet interrelated findings to forecast novel results better than human experts. To evaluate this possibility, we created BrainBench, a forward-looking benchmark for predicting neuroscience results. We find that LLMs surpass experts in predicting experimental outcomes. BrainGPT, an LLM we tuned on the neuroscience literature, performed better yet. Like human experts, when LLMs were confident in their predictions, they were more likely to be correct, which presages a future where humans and LLMs team together to make discoveries. Our approach is not neuroscience-specific and is transferable to other knowledge-intensive endeavors.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Multimodality and Attention Increase Alignment in Natural Language Prediction Between Humans and Computational Models
Authors:
Viktor Kewenig,
Andrew Lampinen,
Samuel A. Nastase,
Christopher Edwards,
Quitterie Lacome DEstalenx,
Akilles Rechardt,
Jeremy I Skipper,
Gabriella Vigliocco
Abstract:
The potential of multimodal generative artificial intelligence (mAI) to replicate human grounded language understanding, including the pragmatic, context-rich aspects of communication, remains to be clarified. Humans are known to use salient multimodal features, such as visual cues, to facilitate the processing of upcoming words. Correspondingly, multimodal computational models can integrate visua…
▽ More
The potential of multimodal generative artificial intelligence (mAI) to replicate human grounded language understanding, including the pragmatic, context-rich aspects of communication, remains to be clarified. Humans are known to use salient multimodal features, such as visual cues, to facilitate the processing of upcoming words. Correspondingly, multimodal computational models can integrate visual and linguistic data using a visual attention mechanism to assign next-word probabilities. To test whether these processes align, we tasked both human participants (N = 200) as well as several state-of-the-art computational models with evaluating the predictability of forthcoming words after viewing short audio-only or audio-visual clips with speech. During the task, the model's attention weights were recorded and human attention was indexed via eye tracking. Results show that predictability estimates from humans aligned more closely with scores generated from multimodal models vs. their unimodal counterparts. Furthermore, including an attention mechanism doubled alignment with human judgments when visual and linguistic context facilitated predictions. In these cases, the model's attention patches and human eye tracking significantly overlapped. Our results indicate that improved modeling of naturalistic language processing in mAI does not merely depend on training diet but can be driven by multimodality in combination with attention-based architectures. Humans and computational models alike can leverage the predictive constraints of multimodal information by attending to relevant features in the input.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
